Connect with us

Published

on

A historic resolution passed by the Texas House of Representatives has sent shockwaves through the Lone Star State’s political landscape. The resolution, brought forth by the House of Representatives of the State of Texas, officially impeaches Attorney General Warren Kenneth Paxton Jr. on a multitude of charges, backed by a series of meticulously detailed articles of impeachment.

The impeachment trial will start Tuesday, September 5, 2024. Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick will assume the role of the presiding judge, while the senators will act as jurors. According to the established rules, if Paxton is found guilty on any of the impeachment charges, he will be ousted from his position for the remainder of his four-year term, set to conclude in 2026. Furthermore, such a conviction could result in a permanent prohibition from holding any public office within the state.

ARTICLE I: Disregard of Official Duty – Protection of Charitable Organization

In this first article, it is alleged that Paxton failed to fulfill his role as the guardian of charitable organizations, as mandated by Chapter 123 of the Property Code. It is claimed that Paxton’s actions adversely affected the Roy F. & JoAnn Cole Mitte Foundation in favor of Nate Paul.

ARTICLE II: Disregard of Official Duty – Abuse of the Opinion Process

Article II accuses Paxton of abusing his official power by manipulating the issuance of legal opinions. It is alleged that Paxton used his position to obstruct foreclosure sales related to properties linked to Nate Paul, concealing his actions through a convoluted scheme involving a Senate committee chair.

ARTICLE III: Disregard of Official Duty – Abuse of the Open Records Process

Paxton is further accused in Article III of misusing his authority under Chapter 552 of the Government Code, ordering his staff to act against the law regarding public information requests. This included refusing proper decisions and issuing decisions that contravened the law and legal precedents.

ARTICLE IV: Disregard of Official Duty – Misuse of Official Information

Article IV alleges that Paxton improperly accessed non-public information for the benefit of Nate Paul.

ARTICLE V: Disregard of Official Duty – Engagement of Cammack

Paxton is charged with engaging Brandon Cammack in an investigation based on a baseless complaint in Article V. This resulted in over 30 grand jury subpoenas being issued, all seemingly in favor of Nate Paul or his business interests.

ARTICLE VI: Disregard of Official Duty – Termination of Whistleblowers

Article VI contends that Paxton violated whistleblower laws (Chapter 554 of the Government Code) by terminating employees who had reported his illegal actions to law enforcement authorities. This was allegedly done in retaliation, with Paxton also engaging in a campaign to damage the whistleblowers’ professional reputations.

ARTICLE VII: Misapplication of Public Resources – Whistleblower Investigation and Report

Paxton is accused of directing the use of public resources in Article VII to conduct a sham investigation into whistleblower complaints and produce a lengthy report containing false or misleading statements in his defense.

ARTICLE VIII: Disregard of Official Duty – Settlement Agreement

Article VIII asserts that Paxton concealed his wrongful acts connected to whistleblower complaints, entering into a settlement agreement paid from public funds. This delay was allegedly advantageous to Paxton, depriving voters of critical information when voting for attorney general.

ARTICLE IX: Constitutional Bribery – Paul’s Employment of Mistress

Paxton is charged with constitutional bribery in Article IX, benefiting from Nate Paul’s employment of a woman with whom Paxton was having an extramarital affair, allegedly resulting in favorable legal assistance for Paul.

ARTICLE X: Constitutional Bribery – Paul’s Providing Renovations to Paxton Home

Article X alleges Paxton benefited from renovations provided to his home by Nate Paul, again resulting in favorable legal assistance for Paul.

ARTICLE XI: Obstruction of Justice – Abuse of Judicial Process

Paxton is accused of abusing the judicial process in Article XI, using it to delay the trial related to his indictment for securities fraud, allegedly depriving voters of an informed choice during the election.

ARTICLE XII: Obstruction of Justice – Interference with Prosecutors

Article XII claims that Paxton benefited from a lawsuit filed by Jeff Blackard, a campaign donor, which disrupted payment to prosecutors involved in his criminal securities fraud case, causing further delays in the trial.

ARTICLE XIII: False Statements in Official Records – State Securities Board Investigation

Article XIII charges Paxton with making false statements to the State Securities Board during their investigation into his failure to register as required by law.

ARTICLE XIV: False Statements in Official Records – Personal Financial Statements

Article XIV accuses Paxton of failing to accurately disclose his financial interests in his personal financial statements, required by law.

ARTICLE XV: False Statements in Official Records – Whistleblower Response Report

Paxton is charged with making multiple false or misleading statements in the response report issued by his office in relation to whistleblower allegations.

ARTICLE XVI: Conspiracy and Attempted Conspiracy

Article XVI alleges Paxton conspired or attempted to conspire to commit acts described in one or more articles.

ARTICLE XVII: Misappropriation of Public Resources

Paxton is charged with misusing his official powers to have employees of his office perform services for his benefit and that of others.

ARTICLE XVIII: Dereliction of Duty

Article XVIII contends that Paxton violated the Texas Constitution, his oaths of office, statutes, and public policy against public officials acting contrary to the public interest.

ARTICLE XIX: Unfitness for Office

In Article XIX, it is alleged that Paxton engaged in misconduct, public or private, indicative of his unfitness for office.

ARTICLE XX: Abuse of Public Trust

The final article, Article XX, accuses Paxton of using his official powers to subvert the government’s lawful operation and obstruct justice, damaging the Office of Attorney General’s reputation and public confidence.

As this impeachment process unfolds, it promises to be a landmark event in the political history of the State of Texas, with ramifications that could extend far beyond its borders.

Featured

Radical Doc Ditches Her Scalpel After Paxton’s Lawsuit Exposes Transgender Hustle

Published

on

Dr. May Lau no longer a doctor

Dallas, TX – A Dallas pediatrician, once hailed as a “trusted resource” for troubled teens, has thrown in the towel on her medical career. Dr. May Lau, the UT Southwestern associate professor whose office walls likely echoed with the sobs of confused adolescents, has voluntarily surrendered her Texas medical license. This comes hot on the heels of a blistering lawsuit from Attorney General Ken Paxton, who accused her of peddling banned gender-transition drugs to at least 21 minors, all while allegedly doctoring records to dodge the law.

Let’s rewind the tape, because this isn’t just another footnote in the endless culture war skirmishes. It’s a stark reminder that in the Lone Star State, at least, the adults in the room are finally drawing a line in the sand against the medical-industrial complex’s latest fad: turning kids into lab rats for irreversible experiments.

Senate Bill 14, signed into law by Gov. Greg Abbott in 2023 and upheld by the Texas Supreme Court, couldn’t be clearer: No puberty blockers, no cross-sex hormones, no mutilating surgeries for anyone under 18 chasing a “gender identity” that clashes with their biology. It’s common-sense guardianship, rooted in the unshakeable truth that children—bless their impressionable hearts—aren’t equipped to consent to life-altering alterations pushed by activists masquerading as healers.

Paxton’s office dropped the hammer on Lau back in October 2024, filing suit in Collin County and laying out a dossier of alleged deceit that would make a Watergate operative blush. We’re talking falsified prescriptions, bogus billing codes, and medical records twisted to make testosterone shots look like treatment for anything but affirming a minor’s delusion about their sex... alleges Paxton. Paxton says over 20 kids—biological females, no less—got dosed with this controlled substance, all post-ban, in direct defiance of Texas Health & Safety Code § 161.702(3). And for good measure, Paxton tacked on claims under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act, painting Lau as a scofflaw who didn’t just break the rules; she gamed the system to keep the hormone pipeline flowing.

Lau’s professional bio paints her as the epitome of the caring clinician: A pediatric specialist at Children’s Medical Center Dallas and Plano, with a self-proclaimed mission to “guide my patients to make the best and healthiest decisions for them“—alongside their parents, naturally. Her Healthgrades profile boasts expertise in adolescent health, reproductive woes, and menstrual mysteries, and she’s even open to telehealth chats for the Zoom-generation youth. But peel back the polish, and the shine fades fast: A measly 2.7-star rating from patients, whispers of controversy, and now this. Affiliated with powerhouse institutions like UT Southwestern, Lau wielded privileges that let her roam hospital halls unchecked—until Paxton turned the spotlight.

The fallout? Swift and surgical. As the case barreled forward, Paxton inked a Rule 11 agreement with Lau, slamming the brakes on her patient-facing practice mid-litigation. No more stethoscope sessions, no more “guidance” sessions that could scar a lifetime. And now, the coup de grâce: Her license is toast, voluntarily surrendered to the Texas Medical Board, ensuring she can’t play white-coated wizard with Texas tykes ever again. The civil suit chugs on, with Paxton gunning for injunctions and fines up to $10,000 per violation—because accountability isn’t optional when you’ve potentially wrecked young bodies and psyches for ideology’s sake.

Attorney General Paxton didn’t mince words in his victory lap, and why should he? “Doctors who permanently hurt kids by giving them experimental drugs are nothing more than disturbed left-wing activists who have no business being in the medical field,” he thundered in a statement that lands like a constitutional thunderclap. “May Lau has done untold damage to children, both physically and psychologically, and the surrendering of her Texas medical license is a major victory for our state. My case against her for breaking the law will continue, and we will not relent in holding anyone who tries to ‘transition’ kids accountable.

Spot on, Ken. This isn’t about cruelty; it’s about custody of the innocent. While the ACLU’s Harper Seldin wails that such enforcement is a “predictable and terrifying result,” trotting out the tired trope of politicians meddling between “families and their doctors,” let’s call the bluff. Families? Try ideologues greenlighting puberty blockers for preteens. Best medical judgment? More like Big Pharma’s profit playbook, subsidized by blue-state bureaucrats and cheered by coastal elites who wouldn’t dream of letting their own kids near the knife.

Lau’s capitulation isn’t isolated—it’s the latest domino in Paxton’s crusade. Just this year, he’s reined in three other Lone Star docs for similar sins, while states like Arkansas and Florida see their bans clobbered in court only to bounce back on appeal. Twenty-six states now stand athwart this madness, a federalist firewall against the transgender tide.

For constitutional conservatives, this saga sings the praises of federalism at its finest: States as laboratories of liberty, shielding the vulnerable from federal overreach and cultural contagions alike. Dr. Lau’s license loss? It’s not vengeance; it’s vindication. A win for wary parents, bewildered youth, and the unyielding biology that no amount of activism can rewrite. As Paxton presses on, one can’t help but wonder: Who’s next in the crosshairs? Because in Texas, the housecleaning has only just begun.

Continue Reading

Featured

Texas Braces for “No Kings” Protests on October 18 – Areas to Avoid

Published

on

George Washington sets crown on fire.

As Texas gears up for a wave of nationwide “No Kings” protests scheduled for Saturday, October 18, residents in major cities across the state are advised to steer clear of key downtown and civic areas to avoid potential disruptions, traffic snarls, and heightened security measures. The anti-authoritarian demonstrations, organized under the banner of opposing perceived executive overreach by President Donald Trump, are expected to draw crowds echoing the large turnouts seen in June. While organizers promote peaceful assembly, past events have occasionally spilled into street closures and increased police presence.

The “No Kings” movement, which frames itself as a grassroots push against authoritarianism, has ties to left-wing groups including Indivisible and, according to state officials, Antifa networks previously designated as domestic terrorists by President Trump. Protests are slated in at least eight Texas locales, focusing on central hubs like city halls, parks, and capitol grounds. Here’s a rundown of the hot spots to sidestep:

CityLocation/DetailsTime WindowNotes
HoustonMarch from Houston City Hall; Rally at Discovery Green (1500 McKinney St)Noon–2 p.m. (rally); ~2 p.m. start (march)Downtown core; expect pedestrian crowds and possible road blocks.
Houston (Suburbs)The Woodlands (Lake Woodlands Dr & Six Pines Dr); La Porte City Hall (604 W Fairmont Pkwy)10 a.m.–1 p.m. (The Woodlands); 10 a.m.–Noon (La Porte)Satellite events in suburban civic spots; lighter traffic but monitor local alerts.
San AntonioTravis Park4–6 p.m.Downtown landmark; anticipate street closures and elevated foot traffic.
DallasPacific Plaza (401 N Harwood St)Noon–3 p.m.Central business district; business commuters should plan alternate routes.
AustinMeet at Texas State Capitol, march ~1 mile to Auditorium Shores2 p.m. startTraverses downtown; riverfront park finale could draw lingering crowds.
Fort Worth501 W 7th St11 a.m.–3 p.m.7th Street corridor in downtown; entertainment district vibe with protest overlay.
ArlingtonArlington Sub Courthouse (700 E Abram St)10 a.m.–NoonCivic center area; near courts, potential for quick law enforcement response.
PlanoNE corner of Preston & Parker Rd (near Wells Fargo Bank)10 a.m.–NoonCommercial intersection; suburban but busy with shoppers and drivers.
LaredoJett Bowl North10 a.m.–NoonLocal rec landmark; public gathering spot in a border community.

These sites were compiled from announcements by organizers and local media reports. There will be many more protests in cities of all sizes. Authorities urge the public to check city traffic apps and news updates for real-time detours.


SIDELINE: Abbott Mobilizes Guard and DPS to Safeguard Austin

In a preemptive strike against potential unrest, Governor Greg Abbott has ordered the deployment of the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) and the Texas National Guard to Austin, where the democrat run city is expected to be the hub of the most violent and extreme protesters. The move, announced Friday, targets the capital city’s planned march amid concerns over links to Antifa groups, which President Trump recently labeled a domestic terrorist organization.

Violence and destruction will never be tolerated in Texas,” Abbott stated in a release from his office. The surge includes state troopers, Special Agents, Texas Rangers, aircraft surveillance, and tactical assets, coordinated with the state’s Homeland Security Division to scan for extremist ties. This echoes a similar summer operation around the Capitol during prior demonstrations.

Local law enforcement will collaborate on arrests for any acts of violence or property damage, emphasizing deterrence over confrontation. Austinites near the Capitol or Auditorium Shores should prepare for a visible security footprint.


Behind the scenes, the “No Kings” push has drawn scrutiny for its funding streams, with reports pointing to deep-pocketed backers like George Soros’ Open Society Foundations (nearly $8 million to Indivisible since 2017), the Arabella Advisors network (over $114 million to affiliates from 2019–2023), and billionaire donors such as Hansjörg Wyss and Walmart heiress Christy Walton. While much of this support flows through dark-money channels for broader civic engagement, critics argue it amplifies protest logistics and messaging.

As the sun sets on these gatherings, it’s worth a final nod to the movement’s own rallying cry: There are no kings in America. And Donald Trump doesn’t see himself as one—for if he did, he wouldn’t allow protests like this to occur in the first place. Stay safe, Texas.

Continue Reading

Featured

ICE Nabs “Worst of the Worst” in Texas Despite Democrat Shutdown

Published

on

Even as the Democrats’ government shutdown drags on in Washington, federal law enforcement officers in Texas are still doing their jobs — without pay — to protect American communities. Over the holiday weekend, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) announced a series of arrests across Texas targeting what officials described as “the worst of the worst” criminal illegal aliens.

According to a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) press release issued October 14, 2025, ICE officers continued operations throughout the shutdown, apprehending repeat offenders and violent criminals across the Lone Star State. The arrests occurred in multiple Texas cities including San Antonio, Waco, Austin, Georgetown, and Brackettville.

“While many Americans enjoyed the holiday weekend, our brave law enforcement worked without pay because of the Democrats’ government shutdown and continued to arrest the worst of the worst criminals—risking their lives to arrest murderers, pedophiles, and other serial criminals,” said Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin.
“We will not allow a government shutdown to stop us from making America safe again.”

Among those arrested in Texas were several repeat offenders, each with serious criminal histories:

  • Yuliana Fernandez-Ledezma, a Venezuelan national, was arrested in San Antonio. She has been convicted of abandoning or endangering a child, a crime that put a minor’s life in danger.
  • Gregoria Salaz-Beltran, a Mexican national, was taken into custody after multiple convictions in both San Antonio and Waco. Her record includes four DWIs and two convictions for kill/poison/serious bodily injury animal cruelty.
  • Ruth Gonzalez-Salazar, also from Mexico, was arrested in Brackettville for smuggling aliens, contributing to the ongoing border security crisis in South Texas.
  • Omar Andrade-Galvez, a Honduran national, was apprehended in Austin, convicted of unlawful restraint—a serious offense involving the restriction of another person’s freedom.
  • Mario Godinez-Lopez, another criminal illegal alien from Mexico, was arrested in Georgetown following a conviction for theft of property.

Each of these individuals had previously been convicted in U.S. courts and were identified as priorities for removal due to their threat to public safety. ICE referred to the group as part of a nationwide effort to locate and detain criminal aliens who continue to reoffend while in the country unlawfully.

Texas Communities Breathe Easier

Local residents across Central and South Texas are expressing relief that these dangerous individuals are now off the streets. The arrests highlight the daily risks ICE officers take—often under political pressure and, in this case, without pay due to the ongoing shutdown.

Critics of the Biden administration have long argued that lax border policies and the failure to secure the southern border have allowed repeat offenders to slip through the cracks, endangering Texas families. The recent arrests show that, despite federal dysfunction in Washington, frontline law enforcement continues to fulfill its mission.

Shutdown Politics, Real-World Consequences

The current government shutdown—sparked by Democrat opposition to a clean spending bill—has left federal employees without pay, including ICE agents and Border Patrol officers. Yet, despite political gridlock, enforcement operations have not ceased. DHS officials emphasized that agents remain committed to national security and community safety, even as many face uncertainty over when they’ll next receive a paycheck.

In many Texas communities, especially along the I-35 and I-10 corridors, illegal immigration remains a top public concern. The presence of repeat offenders—often released under sanctuary or lenient policies—has fueled growing frustration among citizens who see law enforcement as the last line of defense.

Protecting Texas Despite Washington’s Inaction

ICE’s continued success in arresting criminal aliens sends a clear message: Texas will not wait for Washington to act. The agency’s determination during a federal shutdown underscores what many Texans already know—public safety is not a partisan issue, but the consequences of inaction are political.

The DHS statement concluded with a firm reminder that border enforcement is a 24/7 mission.

“We will not allow a government shutdown to stop us from making America safe again,” McLaughlin reiterated.

For now, at least, Texans can rest a little easier knowing that these violent and repeat offenders are behind bars, thanks to the perseverance of federal agents who continue to do their jobs—paycheck or not.

Continue Reading