Dade Phelan, Texas House Speaker: A Call for Resignation Amidst Controversy
The recent impeachment trial of Attorney General Ken Paxton has left many questioning the leadership of Texas House Speaker Dade Phelan. His fervent push for Paxton’s impeachment and subsequent acquittal have ignited a firestorm of criticism and calls for his resignation.
The Origins of the Controversy
The political clash between Attorney General Ken Paxton and Speaker Dade Phelan is a tale fraught with intrigue and personal vendettas. The roots of this controversy extend beyond the impeachment trial, delving into a web of political retribution and simmering tensions. The animosity between Paxton and Phelan escalated when, Attorney General Paxton called for Speaker Phelan’s resignation. Paxton’s demand came after he alleged that Phelan, the Republican from Beaumont, was “in an obviously intoxicated state” while presiding over the House.
In response to Paxton’s call for his resignation, Phelan’s office fired back, suggesting that Paxton’s remarks were an attempt to “save face.” The tension between the two Republican officials was palpable, with each side seeking to gain the upper hand in this high-stakes political battle.
Adding fuel to the fire, video footage from the House floor emerged, capturing a moment at the end of a grueling 14-hour session. In the video, Speaker Phelan appeared to slur his words while debating an amendment to a Senate bill. The video quickly went viral online over the weekend, further intensifying the scrutiny on Phelan’s leadership and behavior.
In a statement issued by Paxton in the wake of the incident, he expressed profound disappointment in Phelan’s conduct. He called for Phelan’s resignation, citing how Phelan’s performance while presiding over the Texas House “in a state of apparent debilitating intoxication” had negatively impacted the legislative process. Paxton argued that such conduct constituted a failure to uphold Phelan’s duty to the public, a sentiment that resonated with many who had witnessed the viral video.
Political Blowback and Escalating Dissatisfaction
The impeachment trial of Attorney General Ken Paxton unleashed a political maelstrom that reverberated across Texas. Speaker Dade Phelan, a key figure in pushing for Paxton’s impeachment, quickly found himself at the center of a storm of controversy and growing dissatisfaction. Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick was among the first to publicly criticize the actions of the House in pursuing Paxton’s impeachment. His scolding of the House following Paxton’s return to office marked a turning point in the unfolding drama.
However, the criticism did not stop there. Within minutes of Paxton’s acquittal, Rep. Brian Harrison, a staunch opponent of impeachment from the outset, called for Speaker Phelan’s immediate resignation. In a strongly worded statement, Harrison decried what he saw as “staggering incompetence and dishonest conduct” within the House leadership. He emphasized the urgent need for accountability in the wake of the impeachment’s controversial conclusion.
But Harrison was not alone in his condemnation. A chorus of voices joined the call for Phelan’s resignation, characterizing the case against Paxton as weak, inept, and an egregious waste of resources. Matt Rinaldi, the chairman of the Texas Republican Party and a vocal critic of Speaker Phelan, lambasted the House leadership for subjecting Texas to what he deemed a “political sham of an impeachment.” Rinaldi’s critique went further, suggesting the need for a change in leadership that would unite the Republican party behind common goals, rather than sharing power with Democrats.
Perhaps the most striking voice to call for Phelan’s resignation was that of former President Donald Trump. Trump, who is currently the frontrunner in the state’s GOP presidential primary, took to Truth Social to declare, “It is time that Speaker Dade Phelan resign after pushing this Disgraceful Sham!” Trump’s endorsement of Attorney General Ken Paxton’s victory was a resounding show of support and added significant weight to the growing demand for Phelan’s departure.
Phelan’s Defense and Accusations
In response to the growing pressure, Speaker Phelan vigorously defended his actions. He lambasted the Senate’s handling of the impeachment trial and specifically targeted Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, alleging bias and manipulation of the process. Phelan maintained that the House had provided ample evidence of Paxton’s alleged corruption, deception, and self-dealing.
“It is extremely unfortunate that after hearing and evaluating this evidence, the Texas Senate chose not to remove him from office,” Phelan lamented. He accused Lt. Gov. Patrick of disrespecting the constitutional impeachment process and claimed that the outcome had been orchestrated from the start.
The Unresolved Questions
As the dust settles on this contentious episode in Texas politics, many questions remain unanswered. Was the impeachment of Attorney General Ken Paxton a genuine pursuit of justice, or was it, as its critics claim, a political sham? Did Speaker Dade Phelan act in the best interests of the people of Texas, or did he overreach his authority in a quest for power and influence?
The answers to these questions may have profound implications for the future of Texas politics. If Speaker Phelan possesses a sense of duty and honor, he may consider resigning in the face of mounting calls for accountability. However, should he choose not to do so, it becomes incumbent upon the people of Texas to exercise their democratic rights. Barring a voluntary resignation, they have the power to voice their discontent through the electoral process and potentially primary Speaker Phelan out of office.
In the end, the path forward will be determined by the actions of those involved and the will of the people. The future of Texas politics hangs in the balance, and the decisions made in the coming weeks and months will shape the state’s political landscape for years to come.
Featured
Radical Doc Ditches Her Scalpel After Paxton’s Lawsuit Exposes Transgender Hustle
Dallas, TX – A Dallas pediatrician, once hailed as a “trusted resource” for troubled teens, has thrown in the towel on her medical career. Dr. May Lau, the UT Southwestern associate professor whose office walls likely echoed with the sobs of confused adolescents, has voluntarily surrendered her Texas medical license. This comes hot on the heels of a blistering lawsuit from Attorney General Ken Paxton, who accused her of peddling banned gender-transition drugs to at least 21 minors, all while allegedly doctoring records to dodge the law.
Let’s rewind the tape, because this isn’t just another footnote in the endless culture war skirmishes. It’s a stark reminder that in the Lone Star State, at least, the adults in the room are finally drawing a line in the sand against the medical-industrial complex’s latest fad: turning kids into lab rats for irreversible experiments.
Senate Bill 14, signed into law by Gov. Greg Abbott in 2023 and upheld by the Texas Supreme Court, couldn’t be clearer: No puberty blockers, no cross-sex hormones, no mutilating surgeries for anyone under 18 chasing a “gender identity” that clashes with their biology. It’s common-sense guardianship, rooted in the unshakeable truth that children—bless their impressionable hearts—aren’t equipped to consent to life-altering alterations pushed by activists masquerading as healers.
Paxton’s office dropped the hammer on Lau back in October 2024, filing suit in Collin County and laying out a dossier of alleged deceit that would make a Watergate operative blush. We’re talking falsified prescriptions, bogus billing codes, and medical records twisted to make testosterone shots look like treatment for anything but affirming a minor’s delusion about their sex... alleges Paxton. Paxton says over 20 kids—biological females, no less—got dosed with this controlled substance, all post-ban, in direct defiance of Texas Health & Safety Code § 161.702(3). And for good measure, Paxton tacked on claims under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act, painting Lau as a scofflaw who didn’t just break the rules; she gamed the system to keep the hormone pipeline flowing.
Lau’s professional bio paints her as the epitome of the caring clinician: A pediatric specialist at Children’s Medical Center Dallas and Plano, with a self-proclaimed mission to “guide my patients to make the best and healthiest decisions for them“—alongside their parents, naturally. Her Healthgrades profile boasts expertise in adolescent health, reproductive woes, and menstrual mysteries, and she’s even open to telehealth chats for the Zoom-generation youth. But peel back the polish, and the shine fades fast: A measly 2.7-star rating from patients, whispers of controversy, and now this. Affiliated with powerhouse institutions like UT Southwestern, Lau wielded privileges that let her roam hospital halls unchecked—until Paxton turned the spotlight.
The fallout? Swift and surgical. As the case barreled forward, Paxton inked a Rule 11 agreement with Lau, slamming the brakes on her patient-facing practice mid-litigation. No more stethoscope sessions, no more “guidance” sessions that could scar a lifetime. And now, the coup de grâce: Her license is toast, voluntarily surrendered to the Texas Medical Board, ensuring she can’t play white-coated wizard with Texas tykes ever again. The civil suit chugs on, with Paxton gunning for injunctions and fines up to $10,000 per violation—because accountability isn’t optional when you’ve potentially wrecked young bodies and psyches for ideology’s sake.
Attorney General Paxton didn’t mince words in his victory lap, and why should he? “Doctors who permanently hurt kids by giving them experimental drugs are nothing more than disturbed left-wing activists who have no business being in the medical field,” he thundered in a statement that lands like a constitutional thunderclap. “May Lau has done untold damage to children, both physically and psychologically, and the surrendering of her Texas medical license is a major victory for our state. My case against her for breaking the law will continue, and we will not relent in holding anyone who tries to ‘transition’ kids accountable.“
Spot on, Ken. This isn’t about cruelty; it’s about custody of the innocent. While the ACLU’s Harper Seldin wails that such enforcement is a “predictable and terrifying result,” trotting out the tired trope of politicians meddling between “families and their doctors,” let’s call the bluff. Families? Try ideologues greenlighting puberty blockers for preteens. Best medical judgment? More like Big Pharma’s profit playbook, subsidized by blue-state bureaucrats and cheered by coastal elites who wouldn’t dream of letting their own kids near the knife.
Lau’s capitulation isn’t isolated—it’s the latest domino in Paxton’s crusade. Just this year, he’s reined in three other Lone Star docs for similar sins, while states like Arkansas and Florida see their bans clobbered in court only to bounce back on appeal. Twenty-six states now stand athwart this madness, a federalist firewall against the transgender tide.
For constitutional conservatives, this saga sings the praises of federalism at its finest: States as laboratories of liberty, shielding the vulnerable from federal overreach and cultural contagions alike. Dr. Lau’s license loss? It’s not vengeance; it’s vindication. A win for wary parents, bewildered youth, and the unyielding biology that no amount of activism can rewrite. As Paxton presses on, one can’t help but wonder: Who’s next in the crosshairs? Because in Texas, the housecleaning has only just begun.
Featured
Texas Braces for “No Kings” Protests on October 18 – Areas to Avoid
As Texas gears up for a wave of nationwide “No Kings” protests scheduled for Saturday, October 18, residents in major cities across the state are advised to steer clear of key downtown and civic areas to avoid potential disruptions, traffic snarls, and heightened security measures. The anti-authoritarian demonstrations, organized under the banner of opposing perceived executive overreach by President Donald Trump, are expected to draw crowds echoing the large turnouts seen in June. While organizers promote peaceful assembly, past events have occasionally spilled into street closures and increased police presence.
The “No Kings” movement, which frames itself as a grassroots push against authoritarianism, has ties to left-wing groups including Indivisible and, according to state officials, Antifa networks previously designated as domestic terrorists by President Trump. Protests are slated in at least eight Texas locales, focusing on central hubs like city halls, parks, and capitol grounds. Here’s a rundown of the hot spots to sidestep:
| City | Location/Details | Time Window | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Houston | March from Houston City Hall; Rally at Discovery Green (1500 McKinney St) | Noon–2 p.m. (rally); ~2 p.m. start (march) | Downtown core; expect pedestrian crowds and possible road blocks. |
| Houston (Suburbs) | The Woodlands (Lake Woodlands Dr & Six Pines Dr); La Porte City Hall (604 W Fairmont Pkwy) | 10 a.m.–1 p.m. (The Woodlands); 10 a.m.–Noon (La Porte) | Satellite events in suburban civic spots; lighter traffic but monitor local alerts. |
| San Antonio | Travis Park | 4–6 p.m. | Downtown landmark; anticipate street closures and elevated foot traffic. |
| Dallas | Pacific Plaza (401 N Harwood St) | Noon–3 p.m. | Central business district; business commuters should plan alternate routes. |
| Austin | Meet at Texas State Capitol, march ~1 mile to Auditorium Shores | 2 p.m. start | Traverses downtown; riverfront park finale could draw lingering crowds. |
| Fort Worth | 501 W 7th St | 11 a.m.–3 p.m. | 7th Street corridor in downtown; entertainment district vibe with protest overlay. |
| Arlington | Arlington Sub Courthouse (700 E Abram St) | 10 a.m.–Noon | Civic center area; near courts, potential for quick law enforcement response. |
| Plano | NE corner of Preston & Parker Rd (near Wells Fargo Bank) | 10 a.m.–Noon | Commercial intersection; suburban but busy with shoppers and drivers. |
| Laredo | Jett Bowl North | 10 a.m.–Noon | Local rec landmark; public gathering spot in a border community. |
These sites were compiled from announcements by organizers and local media reports. There will be many more protests in cities of all sizes. Authorities urge the public to check city traffic apps and news updates for real-time detours.
SIDELINE: Abbott Mobilizes Guard and DPS to Safeguard Austin
In a preemptive strike against potential unrest, Governor Greg Abbott has ordered the deployment of the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) and the Texas National Guard to Austin, where the democrat run city is expected to be the hub of the most violent and extreme protesters. The move, announced Friday, targets the capital city’s planned march amid concerns over links to Antifa groups, which President Trump recently labeled a domestic terrorist organization.
“Violence and destruction will never be tolerated in Texas,” Abbott stated in a release from his office. The surge includes state troopers, Special Agents, Texas Rangers, aircraft surveillance, and tactical assets, coordinated with the state’s Homeland Security Division to scan for extremist ties. This echoes a similar summer operation around the Capitol during prior demonstrations.
Local law enforcement will collaborate on arrests for any acts of violence or property damage, emphasizing deterrence over confrontation. Austinites near the Capitol or Auditorium Shores should prepare for a visible security footprint.
Behind the scenes, the “No Kings” push has drawn scrutiny for its funding streams, with reports pointing to deep-pocketed backers like George Soros’ Open Society Foundations (nearly $8 million to Indivisible since 2017), the Arabella Advisors network (over $114 million to affiliates from 2019–2023), and billionaire donors such as Hansjörg Wyss and Walmart heiress Christy Walton. While much of this support flows through dark-money channels for broader civic engagement, critics argue it amplifies protest logistics and messaging.
As the sun sets on these gatherings, it’s worth a final nod to the movement’s own rallying cry: There are no kings in America. And Donald Trump doesn’t see himself as one—for if he did, he wouldn’t allow protests like this to occur in the first place. Stay safe, Texas.
Featured
ICE Nabs “Worst of the Worst” in Texas Despite Democrat Shutdown
Even as the Democrats’ government shutdown drags on in Washington, federal law enforcement officers in Texas are still doing their jobs — without pay — to protect American communities. Over the holiday weekend, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) announced a series of arrests across Texas targeting what officials described as “the worst of the worst” criminal illegal aliens.
According to a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) press release issued October 14, 2025, ICE officers continued operations throughout the shutdown, apprehending repeat offenders and violent criminals across the Lone Star State. The arrests occurred in multiple Texas cities including San Antonio, Waco, Austin, Georgetown, and Brackettville.
“While many Americans enjoyed the holiday weekend, our brave law enforcement worked without pay because of the Democrats’ government shutdown and continued to arrest the worst of the worst criminals—risking their lives to arrest murderers, pedophiles, and other serial criminals,” said Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin.
“We will not allow a government shutdown to stop us from making America safe again.”
Among those arrested in Texas were several repeat offenders, each with serious criminal histories:
- Yuliana Fernandez-Ledezma, a Venezuelan national, was arrested in San Antonio. She has been convicted of abandoning or endangering a child, a crime that put a minor’s life in danger.
- Gregoria Salaz-Beltran, a Mexican national, was taken into custody after multiple convictions in both San Antonio and Waco. Her record includes four DWIs and two convictions for kill/poison/serious bodily injury animal cruelty.
- Ruth Gonzalez-Salazar, also from Mexico, was arrested in Brackettville for smuggling aliens, contributing to the ongoing border security crisis in South Texas.
- Omar Andrade-Galvez, a Honduran national, was apprehended in Austin, convicted of unlawful restraint—a serious offense involving the restriction of another person’s freedom.
- Mario Godinez-Lopez, another criminal illegal alien from Mexico, was arrested in Georgetown following a conviction for theft of property.
Each of these individuals had previously been convicted in U.S. courts and were identified as priorities for removal due to their threat to public safety. ICE referred to the group as part of a nationwide effort to locate and detain criminal aliens who continue to reoffend while in the country unlawfully.
Texas Communities Breathe Easier
Local residents across Central and South Texas are expressing relief that these dangerous individuals are now off the streets. The arrests highlight the daily risks ICE officers take—often under political pressure and, in this case, without pay due to the ongoing shutdown.
Critics of the Biden administration have long argued that lax border policies and the failure to secure the southern border have allowed repeat offenders to slip through the cracks, endangering Texas families. The recent arrests show that, despite federal dysfunction in Washington, frontline law enforcement continues to fulfill its mission.
Shutdown Politics, Real-World Consequences
The current government shutdown—sparked by Democrat opposition to a clean spending bill—has left federal employees without pay, including ICE agents and Border Patrol officers. Yet, despite political gridlock, enforcement operations have not ceased. DHS officials emphasized that agents remain committed to national security and community safety, even as many face uncertainty over when they’ll next receive a paycheck.
In many Texas communities, especially along the I-35 and I-10 corridors, illegal immigration remains a top public concern. The presence of repeat offenders—often released under sanctuary or lenient policies—has fueled growing frustration among citizens who see law enforcement as the last line of defense.
Protecting Texas Despite Washington’s Inaction
ICE’s continued success in arresting criminal aliens sends a clear message: Texas will not wait for Washington to act. The agency’s determination during a federal shutdown underscores what many Texans already know—public safety is not a partisan issue, but the consequences of inaction are political.
The DHS statement concluded with a firm reminder that border enforcement is a 24/7 mission.
“We will not allow a government shutdown to stop us from making America safe again,” McLaughlin reiterated.
For now, at least, Texans can rest a little easier knowing that these violent and repeat offenders are behind bars, thanks to the perseverance of federal agents who continue to do their jobs—paycheck or not.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login