Rockwall ISD’s New VATRE: A Tax Hike Disguised as Compassion
Rockwall ISD is once again coming to the voters with hat in hand, this time proposing another Voter-Approval Tax Ratification Election (VATRE). If you’ve listened to their messaging, you’ve heard carefully crafted lines about “funding for children,” “supporting teachers,” and “keeping schools safe.” Their webpage even declares, “Unlike a school bond election, a VATRE does not create new debt for the district.”
What they hope you don’t notice—because it’s buried under emotional appeals and PR spin—is that the VATRE is, in fact, a property tax increase. By their own admission, if voters approve this measure, the tax rate will be set at $1.0669 per $100 valuation, which translates into a four-cent net tax increase. That means more money coming out of your pocket in a time when inflation, grocery bills, and housing costs are already crushing Texas families.
This isn’t about children. It’s about money. And Rockwall ISD is hoping you won’t look too closely.
What Rockwall ISD Doesn’t Want You to Focus On
The district’s page admits the VATRE would generate $16.5 million more in local funding, supposedly earmarked for teacher pay, special education, and security measures. The spin is clever: they frame it as “just” $13 a month for the average household. But what they won’t tell you is that taxes always move one direction—up. This VATRE may be four cents today, but it sets the precedent for more tomorrow.
Let’s be clear: this is not a “cost-saving” measure, despite their claims. It is a transfer of wealth from taxpayers to the district’s administrators, who have a long history of mismanaging resources.
The Emotional Blackmail Campaign
If you’ve lived in Rockwall County for any length of time, you’ve seen this playbook before. School officials and their allies will:
- Claim it’s for the children. Oppose the VATRE? Then you must hate kids. Expect to hear warnings about larger class sizes, fewer extracurriculars, or cuts to beloved programs if this measure fails. They want you to feel responsible for hypothetical suffering.
- Invoke teacher martyrdom. We’ll be told, once again, that teachers are spending out of pocket for classroom supplies. While it is true that many teachers sacrifice for their students, it’s also true that RISD’s administration allocates significant funds to bureaucracy, consultants, and pet projects before putting money where it actually matters—the classroom. Throwing more taxpayer dollars into the same broken system doesn’t solve the problem.
- Raise the safety alarm. In recent years, “safety and security” has become the go-to justification for more spending. But safety has no end point. How much is “enough”? The district has yet to prove that previous funds earmarked for safety have been used effectively.
And when emotional appeals fail? That’s when the shaming begins. Dissenters will be accused of being anti-education, anti-child, or even anti-teacher. They will call you selfish, greedy, or ignorant. This is the district’s last refuge: if persuasion doesn’t work, intimidation might.
The Machine Behind the Messaging
This isn’t just a few parents or administrators asking nicely. Rockwall ISD has quietly activated a network of political action committees (PACs) and advocacy groups to push the VATRE. Teachers are being fed talking points and coached on how to present the measure to their friends, neighbors, and church groups. The teachers’ union is involved too, ensuring the campaign looks like a grassroots movement when, in reality, it is an orchestrated lobbying effort funded by taxpayers’ own money.
Let’s not pretend otherwise: this is propaganda. And it’s designed to manipulate the very people footing the bill.
Who Really Benefits?
The district says this money will go toward “teacher and staff pay, underfunded special education, and safety.” But let’s ask a basic question: why are these essential services always the first to be threatened when districts want more money?
Why not cut bloated administration salaries first? Why not trim back the endless layers of consultants, contractors, and bureaucratic staffers who never step foot in a classroom? Why not prioritize spending for the essentials before asking taxpayers for more?
The answer is simple: threatening “the children” is politically effective. Bureaucrats know that no parent wants to imagine their child losing out on opportunity, so they dangle the worst-case scenario in front of voters to secure more funding.
The Conservative Case Against the VATRE
We believe in strong schools, but strong schools are not the same as ever-growing school budgets. Accountability matters. Stewardship matters. If Rockwall ISD cannot manage its existing funds responsibly, why should voters reward them with more?
Texans are already overtaxed. Property taxes in Rockwall County are among the highest in the state. Families are struggling under skyrocketing appraisals, utility hikes, and inflation. The district’s message—“It’s just $13 a month”—is insulting. For many families, that’s groceries, gas, or part of a prescription co-pay. In a time when every dollar counts, the district wants to take more.
The VATRE is not about helping children. It is about feeding a system that always wants more but refuses to live within its means.
Conclusion: Hold the Line
On Election Day, Rockwall County voters will face a simple choice: approve another tax increase, or demand accountability.
If you oppose the VATRE, you’re not against children. You’re not against teachers. You’re for responsible government. You’re for prioritizing classroom needs over bloated bureaucracy. You’re for families already struggling to stay afloat in a tough economy.
The district will try to make you feel guilty. They will tug at your heartstrings and, if that fails, they will call you names. Don’t fall for it.
The VATRE is a tax increase, plain and simple. Rockwall ISD doesn’t need more of your money. They need to spend what they already have more wisely.
Vote NO on the VATRE.
San Antonio, TX – More than 30 missing children were located and recovered during Operation Lightning Bug, a focused law enforcement initiative that stretched from July 28 through August 15. The operation, centered in San Antonio, unveiled not only the scale of child exploitation in the state but also the increasingly urgent role Texas agencies are being forced to play in combating trafficking amid a national border crisis.
The U.S. Marshals Service (USMS), working in concert with the San Antonio Police Department (SAPD) and the Lone Star Fugitive Task Force, spearheaded the mission. In an official release, USMS confirmed that “over 30 missing juveniles” were located, six confirmed trafficking survivors were removed from exploitation, five trafficking investigations were launched, three individuals were arrested for harboring runaways, and nine felony warrants were executed. Additionally, “over 120 missing juveniles [were] encouraged to return home, resulting in cleared entries from state and national databases.”
“The safety of our children is the safety of our communities, and justice demands that we protect those who cannot protect themselves,” said U.S. Marshal Susan Pamerleau for the Western District of Texas. “Through Operation Lightning Bug, we reaffirm our promise to safeguard the most vulnerable and strengthen the safety of our communities.”
SAPD Chief William McManus echoed the urgency behind the operation, stating, “Every suspect arrested, juvenile returned home, and survivor taken out of harm’s way matters. This operation demonstrates what can be achieved when law enforcement agencies unite to protect children.”
A Deliberate Target on Traffickers
Operation Lightning Bug was highly strategic. Teams reviewed every missing juvenile listed in both the Texas Crime Information Center and the National Crime Information Center databases, identifying cases where minors were deemed “at high risk of exploitation by traffickers and predators.” The operation included deputies from USMS offices in San Antonio, Del Rio, Midland, and Pecos, along with specialized SAPD units, including Missing Persons, Special Victims, covert teams, and Street Crimes personnel. Intelligence gathering allowed law enforcement to prioritize the most vulnerable cases and craft operational plans that led to direct recoveries and arrests.
SAPD’s Special Victims Unit interviewed each recovered child to determine whether they had been victimized. Trafficking survivors were immediately connected with Texas Health and Human Services and partner organizations to ensure long-term safety, mental health support, and reintegration assistance.
According to data from the International Center for Missing and Exploited Children, more than 330,000 minors were reported missing in the United States in 2024. While many are found quickly, those who lack stable homes or strong support systems are increasingly being targeted by trafficking rings.
Trafficking Thrives on Instability — and Policy Failure
Kirsta Leeburg Melton, founder and CEO of the Institute to Combat Trafficking, explained to Fox News that “trafficking is the exploitation of men, women and children for forced sex or forced labor by a third party for their profit or gain. That’s been around forever. What hasn’t really been around is people’s understanding of that crime and their knowledge that it’s happening everywhere.”
Melton further noted that traffickers prey on minors with “unstable home lives,” including those suffering from a lack of food, housing, family support, or emotional security. Technology serves as a primary tool for both predators and buyers, giving traffickers a near-invisible reach into vulnerable groups.
The unprecedented influx of undocumented minors during the Biden administration placed child welfare and trafficking oversight systems under intense strain—a crisis Texas law enforcement is still working to contain. By contrast, under President Trump’s term, stricter border enforcement and cartel disruption efforts made it significantly harder for trafficking networks to exploit cross-border routes at scale.
Texas Law Enforcement Takes the Lead
While Washington debates border security and trafficking enforcement in committee rooms, Texas law enforcement agencies continue to operate on the front lines. Operation Lightning Bug not only demonstrated the capability of state and federal joint task forces but also reinforced the necessity of cooperation among local agencies.
The Lone Star Fugitive Task Force, involved in the operation, consists of personnel from SAPD, the Bexar County Sheriff’s Office, Texas DPS, the Texas Attorney General’s Office, Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS), New Braunfels Police Department, Texas Board of Criminal Justice OIG, Bexar County District Attorney’s Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and the U.S. Marshals Service.
Under authority granted by the Justice for Victims of Trafficking Act of 2015, the U.S. Marshals Service now has explicit power to intervene in missing child cases regardless of whether a sex offender or fugitive is involved. This expansion allowed USMS to establish the Missing Child Unit, which now collaborates rapidly with nationwide law enforcement partners.
Operation Lightning Bug showed what can happen when that authority is fully exercised. It demonstrated what many Texans already know: when state and local agencies are given the backing, funding, and legal authority to act, children are saved, predators are taken down, and trafficking networks are disrupted—sometimes permanently.
A Crisis That Isn’t Slowing Down
In August, 11 children were reported missing in North Dakota—a state with a population of fewer than one million. Earlier, in June, authorities recovered more than two dozen children in a Florida operation described as a “first-of-its-kind missing child rescue operation.” These numbers indicate a nationwide escalation rather than isolated events.
As Texas continues to serve as a primary trafficking corridor due to its geographic proximity to the border and multiple interstate routes, state officials are increasingly forced to respond where federal leadership has not.
Child trafficking is often framed as a distant, foreign evil—but Operation Lightning Bug makes it clear: the victims live here. They disappear from neighborhoods, schools, shelters, foster systems, and broken homes. They are not statistics; they are Texas children, lost to predators who thrive in moments of policy weakness and exploit institutional gaps.
Texas Fights — Even as the Battle Grows Harder
There is no declared victory here. But there is proof of impact. Thirty children were found. Six survivors of trafficking were brought out of exploitation and into safety. Five new investigations are underway, likely mapping broader criminal networks. Over 120 missing children—some voluntarily gone, some running from abuse—were convinced to return home. Felony suspects are now in custody.
More importantly, the operation forced public attention on a crisis that prefers to operate in the shadows.
Every rescued child represents a life pulled off a path toward trauma, abuse, or death. Every warrant served sends a message that Texas still has teeth in its justice system. And every coordinated effort reminds traffickers that the state is watching.
Operation Lightning Bug is not the end—but it is a bright flash in the dark, signaling that Texas law enforcement is willing to strike, even when others won’t.
As Texas gears up for a wave of nationwide “No Kings” protests scheduled for Saturday, October 18, residents in major cities across the state are advised to steer clear of key downtown and civic areas to avoid potential disruptions, traffic snarls, and heightened security measures. The anti-authoritarian demonstrations, organized under the banner of opposing perceived executive overreach by President Donald Trump, are expected to draw crowds echoing the large turnouts seen in June. While organizers promote peaceful assembly, past events have occasionally spilled into street closures and increased police presence.
The “No Kings” movement, which frames itself as a grassroots push against authoritarianism, has ties to left-wing groups including Indivisible and, according to state officials, Antifa networks previously designated as domestic terrorists by President Trump. Protests are slated in at least eight Texas locales, focusing on central hubs like city halls, parks, and capitol grounds. Here’s a rundown of the hot spots to sidestep:
| City | Location/Details | Time Window | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Houston | March from Houston City Hall; Rally at Discovery Green (1500 McKinney St) | Noon–2 p.m. (rally); ~2 p.m. start (march) | Downtown core; expect pedestrian crowds and possible road blocks. |
| Houston (Suburbs) | The Woodlands (Lake Woodlands Dr & Six Pines Dr); La Porte City Hall (604 W Fairmont Pkwy) | 10 a.m.–1 p.m. (The Woodlands); 10 a.m.–Noon (La Porte) | Satellite events in suburban civic spots; lighter traffic but monitor local alerts. |
| San Antonio | Travis Park | 4–6 p.m. | Downtown landmark; anticipate street closures and elevated foot traffic. |
| Dallas | Pacific Plaza (401 N Harwood St) | Noon–3 p.m. | Central business district; business commuters should plan alternate routes. |
| Austin | Meet at Texas State Capitol, march ~1 mile to Auditorium Shores | 2 p.m. start | Traverses downtown; riverfront park finale could draw lingering crowds. |
| Fort Worth | 501 W 7th St | 11 a.m.–3 p.m. | 7th Street corridor in downtown; entertainment district vibe with protest overlay. |
| Arlington | Arlington Sub Courthouse (700 E Abram St) | 10 a.m.–Noon | Civic center area; near courts, potential for quick law enforcement response. |
| Plano | NE corner of Preston & Parker Rd (near Wells Fargo Bank) | 10 a.m.–Noon | Commercial intersection; suburban but busy with shoppers and drivers. |
| Laredo | Jett Bowl North | 10 a.m.–Noon | Local rec landmark; public gathering spot in a border community. |
These sites were compiled from announcements by organizers and local media reports. There will be many more protests in cities of all sizes. Authorities urge the public to check city traffic apps and news updates for real-time detours.
SIDELINE: Abbott Mobilizes Guard and DPS to Safeguard Austin
In a preemptive strike against potential unrest, Governor Greg Abbott has ordered the deployment of the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) and the Texas National Guard to Austin, where the democrat run city is expected to be the hub of the most violent and extreme protesters. The move, announced Friday, targets the capital city’s planned march amid concerns over links to Antifa groups, which President Trump recently labeled a domestic terrorist organization.
“Violence and destruction will never be tolerated in Texas,” Abbott stated in a release from his office. The surge includes state troopers, Special Agents, Texas Rangers, aircraft surveillance, and tactical assets, coordinated with the state’s Homeland Security Division to scan for extremist ties. This echoes a similar summer operation around the Capitol during prior demonstrations.
Local law enforcement will collaborate on arrests for any acts of violence or property damage, emphasizing deterrence over confrontation. Austinites near the Capitol or Auditorium Shores should prepare for a visible security footprint.
Behind the scenes, the “No Kings” push has drawn scrutiny for its funding streams, with reports pointing to deep-pocketed backers like George Soros’ Open Society Foundations (nearly $8 million to Indivisible since 2017), the Arabella Advisors network (over $114 million to affiliates from 2019–2023), and billionaire donors such as Hansjörg Wyss and Walmart heiress Christy Walton. While much of this support flows through dark-money channels for broader civic engagement, critics argue it amplifies protest logistics and messaging.
As the sun sets on these gatherings, it’s worth a final nod to the movement’s own rallying cry: There are no kings in America. And Donald Trump doesn’t see himself as one—for if he did, he wouldn’t allow protests like this to occur in the first place. Stay safe, Texas.
Government
Texas Military Families Feel Immediate Impact of Shutdown as Food Pantry Lines Surge Outside Fort Hood
Killeen, Texas – Before dawn Thursday morning, military families began lining up outside the Armed Services YMCA food pantry in Harker Heights, just miles from Fort Hood. By 5 a.m., the line wrapped around the building—an unprecedented sight for the nonprofit that serves thousands of Central Texas military households.
By mid-morning, the pantry’s shelves were empty. “We had a 34% increase this week over past weeks,” said Dorene Ocamb, the Armed Services YMCA’s chief brand and development officer, in comments first reported by Military Times. “We expected an increase, but didn’t quite expect this.”
The surge in demand followed the federal government shutdown that began at 12:01 a.m. Wednesday after Congress failed to pass a continuing resolution to keep agencies funded. Troops received their October 1st paychecks, but uncertainty looms over whether the October 15th pay cycle will be disrupted.
Anxiety Hits Home in Central Texas
Fort Hood, one of the largest U.S. Army installations in the world, anchors the economy of Central Texas. When military families face financial disruption, the ripple effects hit Killeen, Harker Heights, and surrounding communities almost immediately.
“There’s a lot of anticipatory anxiety around potentially losing a paycheck,” Ocamb told Military Times. Families who rely on steady pay are taking precautions: stretching food budgets, delaying bills, and turning to nonprofits for help.
Normally, the pantry’s food supply lasts until early afternoon. On Thursday, shelves were bare by 10 a.m. Hundreds of families—many with young children—came through in just a few hours. Diapers and wipes, not usually available at the site, were distributed to mothers and expectant mothers as needs spiked.
Political Gridlock in Washington
While Democrats and Republicans traded blame this week, the breakdown came down to one central issue: House Republicans passed a short-term “clean” continuing resolution to keep the government open while negotiations continued, but Senate Democrats rejected it, insisting on adding billions in new spending provisions.
As a result, non-essential government functions were shuttered, and military families are left bracing for missed paychecks.
Republicans from Texas have been outspoken in their criticism. Rep. Roger Williams (R-TX), chairman of the House Small Business Committee, said Democrats are “holding our troops hostage to force more reckless spending.” Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) added that “a clean CR would keep the lights on and keep paychecks flowing. It’s the Democrats’ refusal to compromise that is pushing military families into food pantry lines.”
Food and Childcare Relief
The Armed Services YMCA in Killeen, which has two distribution locations, prioritizes junior enlisted families but does not restrict food aid by rank. Families can take up to 25 pounds of shelf-stable items, dairy, frozen protein, and fresh produce, choosing what fits their needs. “Food is one of those basic needs. If you show up and need food, we’re going to serve you,” Ocamb said.
In addition to food, ASYMCA announced it will allow parents to defer childcare payments at its centers until military pay resumes—a critical measure for dual-income military households.
Texas Bears a Larger Burden
With more than 163,000 active-duty service members, Texas has one of the highest concentrations of military families in the nation. What happens here sets the tone for bases nationwide. Similar scenes of food insecurity are playing out across the country—in San Diego, Norfolk, Fort Bragg, and Alaska—as nonprofits scramble to increase the frequency of their distributions.
But in Texas, the impact is magnified. Fort Hood alone is home to tens of thousands of soldiers and dependents. When paychecks stop, the economic shock ripples not just through the base, but through grocery stores, childcare providers, landlords, and small businesses that depend on military customers.
A Message to Military Families
Ocamb’s advice to families was direct: “Go out and seek out food pantry help. It may help alleviate a line item in their budget,” she said. That relief, she noted, can free up cash for rent, mortgages, or car payments.
Families without access to an ASYMCA pantry are encouraged to use FoodFinder.us, which lists food pantries nationwide by ZIP code. Banks, credit unions, and military relief societies are also preparing to assist families if the shutdown drags on.
The Bottom Line
The faces of the shutdown are not lobbyists or politicians in Washington—they are the military families in Central Texas waiting in line for food before sunrise. While Democrats in the Senate refuse to accept a clean resolution that would keep the government funded, those serving in uniform and their children are left bearing the consequences.
- This article has been revised to reflect the correct name of Fort Hood, formally known as Fort Cavazos.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login