Petro-Hunt and Stillwater Capital Unveil Apartments & Commercial Development Plans in Fate
Public Expresses Concerns Over Lack of Details and Impact on City Services
FATE, TX – Last night, October 5, 2023, the Chamberlain Amenity Center played host to a presentation by Petro-Hunt in association with Stillwater Capital regarding their proposed development project. The developer seeks a Planned Development (PD) designation, which would grant them significant autonomy in setting their own development rules. However, concerns have emerged over the vagueness of their presentation and the potential consequences for the Fate community.
The key highlights of the presentation are as follows:
- Mixed-Use Development: The project is anticipated to comprise a three story apartment building with approximately 375 apartments, though the exact number remains uncertain. It will also include townhouses, though specifics were not provided. Additionally, the apartments will feature business storefronts or “Live/Work” units with 10 ft. high ceilings. The developer was unconvinced even in their own presentation that “Live / Work” units were even in demand….they ‘think’ so… but there is always the option to convert those units entirely into ordinary apartments.
- Retail and Commercial Areas: The project’s retail and commercial areas were described as placeholders, with the developer not committing to a timeline for their construction. These undeveloped “pads” could remain vacant for an indefinate period.
- Trail to Nowhere: The developer plans to install a trail between their property and the creek that runs to the north, which connects to nowhere except the public sidewalk at the intersection of 551 & Greenbrier Road, across from the Fresh market. Concerns were raised by citizens about the developers lack of a maintenance plan. It appears maintance of the trail will be at the responsibility and cost to the city (ie: taxpayers).
- Financial Contributions: Critics pointed out that the project appears to contribute little to the community beyond some additional tax revenue. There were no commitments to funding parks, police, fire services, or schools. The possibility of contributing to a traffic light was mentioned, but “only if deemed necessary by TXdot”. They presented that they would be widening the road, as if that was a benefit to the town. However it was quickly pointed out by the Fate Tribune that the widening of the road was for the developers own benefit because without this development, there would be no need to widen the road.
- School Impact: The developer did not offer any solice for how their project would impact local schools, leaving many residents worried about potential overcrowding.
- Housing and Pricing: The project is not receiving Housing and Urban Development (HUD) funding or loan guarantees, and the anticipated market rate for the apartments is approximately $1800 per month.
- Retail uncertain: The types of businesses for the retail spaces remain uncertain, including whether any might feature live music. They ‘hope’ there will restaurants … but they don’t know.
- Retail Pad Sizes: The retail pads in the development are expected to range from 6000 to 10000 square feet. One set of retail pads will have a green space connecting them. They ‘hope’ that this will encourage restaurants.
- PD Design Documents: While the developer claimed to have PD design documents ready for submission, these documents were not presented to the public during the forum. The type of exterior materials that will be mandated by the PD (if any) are unknown. The design criteria is unknown. The parking requirements are unknown. Signage unknown. Yet, supposedly the documents are ready to submit…it should be interesting to see what they contain.
- Parking: The developer stated that the parking provided is based on their own assessment of the parking that would be needed and not upon any instruction from city staff.
- Increase in Crime: Citizens proposed that history has shown that apartments increase crime in the area. The presenters listened to the publics concerns, however they had no rebuttal to offer.
Notably absent from the presentation was information regarding any potential incentives the developer might be receiving from the city. Unfortunately, we failed in our regard to pose this question. We appologize to our readers for this oversight but we will find out before the issue comes before council.


Councilman Mark Harper and P&Z Councilmember Karen Kiser were present at the meeting, and it was revealed that the development will be presented to the P&Z Board on October 19, 2023. If it secures approval at that stage, it will then proceed to the City Council for a vote. It should be noted that the previously stated date of November 13, 2023, for City Council consideration is now uncertain. The Fate Tribune will continue to closely monitor this development as it progresses through the approval process, and we encourage citizens to engage with their local representatives to seek clarity on the various concerns raised during the presentation.
Council
Refugio’s Government Meltdown: Mayor, Secretary and Three Council Officials Arrested in Two Days
Refugio, TX — It is one thing when a Texas mayor gets arrested. It is quite another when the mayor, city secretary and three current or former council members are all swept into the same criminal investigation within roughly 48 hours. That is what happened this week in Refugio, a small South Texas town where local government has suddenly become the subject of a Texas Rangers investigation and multiple felony charges.
Mayor Wanda Dukes and City Secretary Callie Shreckengost were arrested Wednesday on first-degree felony charges involving the alleged misapplication of fiduciary property valued at $300,000 or more, according to reporting by Crossroads Today and Texas Municipal Watch. The allegations involve the town’s Economic Development Corporation funds.
Then came Thursday.
Mayor Pro Tem Ixtlazihuatl “Lala” Vasquez, along with former council members Michael Rocha and Frank Hosey, surrendered at the Refugio County Jail and were arrested on third-degree felony charges alleging abuse of official capacity involving government property valued at more than $30,000 but less than $150,000.
The Texas Rangers reportedly told Crossroads Today that Thursday’s arrests stem from the same grand jury indictment that produced the charges against Dukes and Shreckengost. Texas Municipal Watch reported that it had not independently reviewed the indictment and was relying on Crossroads Today’s account of the Rangers’ statement.
Under Texas Penal Code Section 39.02, abuse of official capacity involves a public servant intentionally or knowingly misusing government property, services, personnel or other resources under that official’s control for an improper benefit or to harm or defraud another person. At the dollar range alleged in the Thursday arrests, the offense is classified as a third-degree felony.
The identities of the officials involved are not in question. Refugio County records list Dukes as mayor, Vasquez as Alderman Place 1, Rocha as Alderman Place 3, and Hosey as Alderman Place 4. Town financial records also identify Shreckengost as city secretary.
But there is still a great deal the public does not know.
Texas Municipal Watch reported that the specific conduct allegedly underlying the charges against Vasquez, Rocha and Hosey had not yet been independently confirmed, nor had the outlet confirmed their release conditions or upcoming court appearances. The underlying indictment had also not been obtained at the time of its Thursday report.
The town council has apparently recognized that it has a problem. Council members Robert Jaso and Dana Alsop issued an identical statement Wednesday saying the town was aware of criminal accusations against officials, could not comment on an ongoing investigation, and intended to take steps to protect municipal resources. They also said a special meeting would be held as soon as possible to consider whatever action might be necessary.
Council
“Not Guilty”: Eva Royer Acquitted After Granbury Election Fraud Prosecution
Granbury, TX – A Granbury political fight that escalated into a criminal prosecution has ended with a jury refusing to convict Eva Royer, a Hood County Republican Party official who was arrested after questions arose over the address she used when filing to run for Granbury City Council.
Royer was found not guilty after facing charges of perjury of certain election procedures and election fraud stemming from her 2024 City Council candidacy, according to reporting by Erin Anderson of Texas Scorecard. The verdict closes a case that had already raised uncomfortable questions about how aggressively local government pursued what began as a dispute over residency.
The case began after Royer filed to run for Granbury City Council Place 5 in August 2024. She listed a Granbury address and stated that she had lived within the city for approximately two years and nine months. City officials later questioned whether that address was actually her primary residence.
Royer withdrew her candidacy before a scheduled City Council meeting could determine whether she met the city’s residency requirements. That could have been the end of the matter.
It wasn’t.
In April 2025, Granbury police arrested Royer on one count of perjury of certain election procedures, a state jail felony, and one count of election fraud, a Class A misdemeanor. She posted bond and was released the following day. The charges were based largely on allegations that she used a Granbury property as her residence even though officials believed she primarily lived elsewhere.
The prosecution focused heavily on three locations: Royer’s Granbury property, a home in Pecan Plantation belonging to her former boyfriend, and a Dallas condominium.
The state presented evidence that Royer’s vehicle entered and exited Pecan Plantation regularly. A security director testified that Royer had a guest pass connected to the vehicle, but also acknowledged under questioning from defense attorney Rob Christian that regularly visiting a boyfriend does not necessarily make someone a resident. He further testified that a guest tag indicated the person was not a resident.
Prosecutors also pointed to the fact that Royer’s Granbury property had been approved for short-term rental use. But testimony established that a short-term rental permit did not require the property to be rented for any particular number of days. In other words, having a permit to rent a house does not automatically establish that its owner doesn’t live there.
Then came the homestead exemption argument.
Hood County Chief Appraiser Jeff Law testified that Royer had not claimed a homestead exemption on the Granbury property. Her attorney countered that the property was owned through Royer’s LLC, making her ineligible for the exemption under the circumstances. Royer’s driver license also listed the Granbury address.
The trial also produced testimony about the investigation itself, including the use of license plate reader technology (FLOCK) to locate Royer. Texas Scorecard reported that her former boyfriend’s license plate had been placed on a “hot list” because of his association with Royer. Police eventually arrested Royer after locating her with Bolton.
And there was considerably more.
Defense questioning raised issues involving city officials, police leadership and communications concerning the prosecution. According to Texas Scorecard’s trial coverage, Granbury Police Chief Mitch Galvan acknowledged providing incorrect testimony during earlier proceedings and acknowledged that text messages concerning the case had not initially been produced despite court orders.
Royer’s acquittal ends the criminal case, but it leaves questions about how the dispute escalated to that point. Why was so much pressure brought against her over the address she used on her election paperwork? Why did multiple officials at the City of Granbury become so deeply involved in pursuing the matter after she had withdrawn from the race? And given the issues raised during the trial about the investigation and the handling of evidence, are there additional questions about how and why the case was pursued? Those questions remain unanswered, and whether there is a deeper problem within Granbury’s political or administrative structure is something that warrants further examination.
Austin
Texas GOP Wants Closed Primaries. New Secretary of State Robert Howden Is Preparing to Fight Them.
Austin, TX – Texas Republicans spent years demanding control of their own primary. Now they have a new Secretary of State, Robert S. Howden, appointed by Republican Governor Greg Abbott, and the man taking over the state’s election machinery is inheriting a lawsuit in which his office is expected to defend the very open primary system the GOP wants to dismantle.
The Republican Party of Texas filed the federal lawsuit in September 2025, arguing that Texas’ open primary system violates the party’s First Amendment right of association. Under the current system, Texas voters do not register by party and may choose which party’s primary to vote in during an election cycle. The GOP wants only registered Republicans participating in Republican primaries.
The case is pending in federal court in Amarillo before U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk.
And Robert S. Howden has now inherited it.
Howden Steps Into the Fight
Gov. Abbott appointed Howden as Texas’ 116th secretary of state on July 17, effective July 18. Howden previously served as Abbott’s senior adviser and director of legislative affairs and has worked in the administrations of four Republican governors. As secretary of state, he is Texas’ chief elections officer.
Abbott has been quite clear about where he stands.
At the 2026 Republican Party convention, he said Texas would eventually make clear that “only Republicans vote in Republican primaries.” Abbott has also said lawmakers “can and should be more responsive to Republicans than a judge may be,” indicating that he expects the Legislature to address the issue during the 2027 session.
But that doesn’t mean the Secretary of State’s office is supposed to simply surrender in court.
That was the position taken by Howden’s predecessor, Jane Nelson.
Nelson argued that changing Texas’ primary system was a job for the Legislature, not a federal judge. In an October 2025 statement, she said it was her responsibility to defend existing election laws and that she would implement whatever changes the Legislature lawfully enacted.
The Attorney General’s office took the opposite position.
Attorney General Ken Paxton sided with the Texas GOP, asking the federal court to strike down portions of the Texas Election Code governing open primaries. According to reporting by The Texas Tribune, Nelson’s lawyers said Paxton’s office gave them less than an hour’s notice before taking the opposing position.
So the Republican Party sued the Republican-controlled state government. The Republican Attorney General joined the plaintiffs. And the Republican Secretary of State fought the lawsuit.
That’s not exactly the tidy party unity politicians like to advertise.
The Real Fight Is Over Who Controls the Nomination
The GOP argues that crossover voting allows Democrats and independents to influence Republican nominations, potentially helping candidates who are less conservative than the party base.
The lawsuit specifically pointed to the 2024 Republican primaries involving former House Speaker Dade Phelan and Rep. Gary VanDeaver. Both won their races by fewer than 800 votes, and the party argued that crossover voters helped determine the outcomes.
The party has already made closing primaries an official priority. Republicans adopted rules supporting closed primaries in 2024 and renewed that push at their 2026 convention.
But changing the system is not as simple as flipping a switch.
Texas has more than 18 million registered voters, and the state’s registration system was never designed around party registration. Moving to closed primaries could require new registration procedures, computer-system changes and a method for existing voters to establish party affiliation.
The GOP wants the courts to clear the way, preferably in time for 2028.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login