Abridging the Freedom of Speech in Social Media
Do social media companies actually have the right to censor speech? The answer may not be what you were expecting.
Much has been said of late about the ability of social media platforms to censor the speech of the users of those platforms. By most legal scholars the right of a corporation to decide what they will or will not allow on their platforms is absolute. “It’s their company, and they have a right to decide what to allow” … is what we are told time and again.
In reality, it’s not as simple as some would have you believe. In fact, there are all sorts of restrictions on companies (corporations) with regard to what they are permitted to do, or say, about their business or their customers.
For example, it used to be an accepted fact that a business has the right to “refuse service to anyone”. However, this is no longer the case. The reason why a person is “refused service” matters in the eyes of the law. You can’t refuse to serve someone due to their race or their sex for example. In some instances, you can’t refuse service to someone based on their sexual partner choices, although this is still an evolving issue.
In other examples, a business can’t deny someone employment, for the same reasons; or housing; or loans.
In all these situations, we affirm that an individual has rights that supersede those of the business or corporation. So why is censorship by a business or corporation any different? Why doesn’t the individual using the social media platform not have a right to be free from censorship or persecution by the corporation for expressing their views?
I would submit that the difference is one of absolute political bias, and not one of law or constitutional right.
There are no situations of record in which the major social media companies have censored a “progressive” of “leftist” user for their speech. In almost every case, censorship always runs in one direction, to the conservative right.
Perhaps some evidence to support the theory that corporations don’t have the right to censor users, despite their claims to the contrary, lies in the fact that they never state the reason for the censorship is due to a differing opinion. They always base the censorship on a falsified, third-party interpretation of analysis that they have designated as “fact-checking”.
The presumption here is that as long as the social media company cites a third party as the arbitrator of truth, then content that is non-truthful would be subject to censorship; and the user could even be punished for telling non-truths. Or so the theory goes. But this theory has not yet been fully tested in the legal system as yet.
To reemphasize the point, these social media companies are not basing their censorship on a straight-up disagreement over the “point of view”, as they ‘theoretically’ would have the grounds to stand, if they truly have the right to refuse service to anyone, “because it’s their business, and they can choose what gets posted.” They should have no fear is stating this outright.
No, they have outsourced their justification, which means they probably don’t actually believe they hold this right and nobody wants to go into court to defend it. For if they lost on those grounds … all bets would be off.
Let’s consider something else.
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution is pretty clear and interpretations have withstood the test of time. It states,
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”
Without question, the courts have ruled this provision applies only to the restriction of the government’s powers and right, not the people. Lest we forget, the Constitution only ‘sanctifies’ the right of Man that were granted by God. In other words, our individual rights are not granted by the Constitution they are granted by God. The constitution states that the Government can’t take those rights from you.
So let’s break out the section where “Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech,…”
In essence, the Freedom of Speech comes from God and this document emphatically states that Congress shall not interfere with that. Pretty simple, and universally accepted.
So what does this have to do with a Corporation? Don’t they have freedom of speech as well?
Well …. It’s been interpreted by courts that Corporations have free speech. But is this really correct?
God didn’t invent Corporations. God invented Man and Man invented Corporations. Thus, God didn’t give corporations rights, Man did. Specifically, Man created laws, through Congress that established the rules in which a Corporation MUST operate. Despite what Mitt Romney thinks, Corporations are not people. They are non-living paper entities that exist to deal with legal and tax implications. They are a creation of the Government.
See where this is going?
The First Amendment says that “Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech…” But by creating the rules in which an entity known as a “corporation” is developed and then allowing that entity to “abridge” free speech, Congress has itself done exactly what the Constitution has forbidden. Congress has in effect outsourced censorship.
What can we do about this?
Two things have to be done in order for the people to retake their constitutional rights.
The first is that Congress must finally recognize, and create legislation, that specifically acknowledges that Corporations are NOT people. That corporations are not living organisms created by God and therefore do not have the same rights and privileges as People. This will go a long way to righting many of the wrongs that corporations have inflicted upon the citizens of the world.
The second is that Congress must create legislation that states that the limited powers of the government are also restricted to corporations in the same manner as that of the Government, for the corporation is an offspring of the government. Meaning, that a corporation can not violate any provision of the U.S. Constitution with regard to the rights of the individual. This includes the right to Free Speech … among others.
If the People of the United States can force through these very simple pieces of legislation, the rights of the People could once again be secured… and our democracy will be able to put this horrible period of history behind us.
Trump’s “UFO Files” Drop Lands With a Thud, Leaving Believers and Skeptics Equally Unsatisfied
Department of War – For years, UFO believers promised the truth was buried somewhere deep inside government vaults, hidden behind classified markings and decades of official denials. The long-awaited disclosure, they said, would prove humanity is not alone. So when the Trump administration released a major archive of UFO-related material this week, anticipation exploded across social media and conspiracy circles alike. The result, however, landed with all the excitement of opening a mystery safe only to discover it filled with newspaper clippings, hobby magazines, and blurry photos of distant lights in the sky.
The files were released through the federal archive portal at www.WAR.GOV/UFO Files and include videos, audio recordings, witness statements, correspondence, and archival documents connected to unidentified flying objects, now often called unidentified anomalous phenomena, or UAPs.
The website also prominently features a statement from Donald Trump posted from Truth Social:
“Based on the tremendous interest shown, I will be directing the Secretary of War, and other relevant Departments and Agencies, to begin the process of identifying and releasing Government files related to alien and extraterrestrial life, unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), and unidentified flying objects (UFOs), and any and all other information connected to these highly complex, but extremely interesting and important, matters. GOD BLESS AMERICA!”
The Department of War website also states that additional material will continue to be released on a weekly basis, suggesting the current archive represents only the first phase of a broader disclosure effort. That announcement has kept many UFO enthusiasts hopeful that more substantial evidence could still emerge in future document dumps.
For now, however, the initial release appears to contain little that fundamentally changes the public understanding of UFO phenomena.
Despite years of sensational claims about craft performing maneuvers that supposedly “defy physics,” none of the videos included in the archive appear to show anything close to that. The objects captured on camera are consistently small, far away, and moving in mostly straight lines at what appear to be ordinary, subsonic speeds. There are no impossible right-angle turns, no instantaneous acceleration, no sudden stops, and no visible flight characteristics beyond what could plausibly be explained by conventional objects or optical effects.
File: DOD_111688964 – Taken 2024-06-01 – The United States Northern Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of 21 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2024. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D8, described the UAP as consisting of an object with a vertical pole or bar attached to the bottom of the object. The observer also reported that the UAP may instead be a reflection from an object in the water.
Most of the footage consists of little more than bright shiny objects against the sky, filmed from such extreme distances that meaningful identification becomes nearly impossible. A few clips appear consistent with balloons or commercial drones. Others show glowing or reflective orbs with no discernible structure or detail. None of the material independently verifies the extraordinary claims often promoted by UFO media personalities and internet commentators.
The release arrives after years of mounting public fascination with UFOs. Congressional hearings, Pentagon acknowledgements of unexplained aerial sightings, and endless online speculation helped create expectations that the government might eventually reveal evidence of non human intelligence. Those expectations likely contributed to the enormous interest surrounding this document dump.
But much of the archive reads less like disclosure and more like an oversized collection of unresolved anecdotes and cultural memorabilia. Witness statements describe strange lights, odd movements, and unusual sightings, but almost none are supported by physical evidence, radar tracking, or technical analysis capable of independent verification. Some are handwritten personal accounts submitted decades ago by ordinary citizens reporting mysterious experiences investigators apparently could neither confirm nor explain.
A surprisingly large portion of the collection focuses on civilian UFO enthusiast organizations that published magazines and newsletters dedicated to sightings and theories about alien life. Rather than classified military revelations, many files simply document the activities of hobbyist groups fascinated by UFO culture during the Cold War era and beyond.
The archive also includes letters from school children asking the government whether flying saucers and aliens are real. While historically interesting as a reflection of American pop culture and public curiosity, the letters offer no evidentiary value regarding extraterrestrial life. Some of the material feels more appropriate for a museum exhibit on twentieth century UFO fascination than for a headline generating government disclosure project.
NASA related recordings and footage included in the release similarly failed to produce dramatic revelations. Most involve routine aerospace operations, ambiguous observations, or discussions about unidentified objects without any conclusion that they originated from beyond Earth. NASA has consistently maintained there is no confirmed evidence of alien visitation, and nothing in this release appears to alter that position.
Reaction online quickly shifted from excitement to frustration. Some UFO believers claimed the truly important files are still hidden behind classification barriers and that the public release was carefully sanitized before publication. Skeptics argued the archive merely reinforces what critics have long maintained, that UFO mythology survives largely because blurry footage and incomplete information allow people to project extraordinary conclusions onto ordinary phenomena.
Notably absent from the release are the kinds of materials long promised in sensational documentaries and conspiracy forums. There are no recovered alien craft, no biological specimens, no authenticated extraterrestrial communications, and no government memos admitting contact with non human intelligence. More importantly, there is no footage of any object displaying flight characteristics that genuinely challenge known physics.
That disconnect between public expectation and documented reality may ultimately be the biggest story.
For decades, UFO culture has operated on the assumption that earth shattering proof exists just beyond public reach. Every blurry light becomes a possible spacecraft. Every vague government statement fuels another round of speculation. Entire media industries now thrive on the promise that disclosure is always right around the corner.
Yet when the files finally arrived, they mostly revealed what Americans have seen for generations, distant lights, uncertain observations, stories without proof, and a government willing to catalog mystery without necessarily solving it.
Perhaps future weekly releases from the Department of War will contain something more compelling. But if this first archive is any indication, Americans waiting for undeniable proof of alien visitation may need to lower their expectations considerably.
Thune’s Dismissive Smear of Election Integrity Concerns Demands His Immediate Ouster
Opinion – Senate Majority Leader John Thune has revealed his utter contempt for the American electorate. Amid mounting pressure to advance the SAVE America Act—a straightforward bill requiring voter ID and proof of citizenship to safeguard federal elections—Thune shrugged off the grassroots outcry as nothing more than a “paid influencer ecosystem.”
This arrogant dismissal, captured in recent comments to reporters, isn’t just tone-deaf; it’s a betrayal of the millions of everyday Americans who demand secure elections as a cornerstone of our republic.
Thune’s remarks didn’t emerge in a vacuum. They came as conservatives, including President Trump and a chorus of activists, ramped up calls for the Senate to use procedural tools like a talking filibuster to force a vote on the SAVE Act.
The legislation, already passed by the House, addresses widespread fears of voter fraud by ensuring only citizens cast ballots—a measure supported by an overwhelming 80-90% of Americans across party lines, according to polls from Gallup, Rasmussen, and others. Yet Thune, ensconced in his leadership perch, waved it away, implying the push is manufactured by compensated online agitators rather than genuine civic concern.
As one critic aptly put it, this reduces the legitimate worries of voters to a “social media echo chamber,” ignoring the real-world efforts of poll watchers, state lawmakers, and ordinary citizens who’ve fought for transparency since the chaotic expansions of mail-in voting during the 2020 pandemic.
Let’s be clear: Thune’s words aren’t a mere slip; they’re a window into the soul of a career politician who’s lost touch with the base that elevated Republicans to Senate control. Public skepticism about election integrity isn’t fringe—it’s mainstream. Polls consistently show that a significant portion of voters, including independents and minorities, harbor doubts about the security of our processes, fueled by irregularities in battleground states and the rapid, unchecked changes implemented under the guise of COVID emergencies.
Organizations like the Election Integrity Network and grassroots groups have documented these issues through audits, lawsuits, and reform proposals, all driven by patriotism, not paychecks.
To smear these efforts as the work of “paid influencers” is not only insulting but dangerously divisive, echoing the elitist disdain that has alienated voters from the GOP establishment for years.
This isn’t Thune’s first rodeo in undermining conservative priorities. As the No. 2 Republican under Mitch McConnell, he previously downplayed candidates focused on 2020 election concerns, blaming them for midterm setbacks rather than addressing the underlying voter frustrations.
Now, as Majority Leader, he wields immense power over the legislative agenda, yet he’s dragging his feet on border security, spending reforms, and yes, election safeguards—issues that define the MAGA movement and the party’s platform. His reluctance to “bust the filibuster” or rally votes for the SAVE Act, despite a Republican majority, reeks of cowardice or worse: complicity in preserving a system that benefits the uniparty elite. Even Elon Musk has publicly questioned if Thune is “owned by someone,” a sentiment echoed across conservative networks.
The backlash has been swift and justified. Activists, commentators like Tomi Lahren, and everyday Americans on platforms like X have torched Thune for his arrogance, with calls to “vacate the chair” gaining traction. From podcasters decrying him as a “RINO on steroids” to voters labeling him a “damn liar,” the outrage underscores a deeper fracture: Senate Republicans are failing their base, and Thune is the poster child for this dysfunction.
Thune Must Go—Step Down or Be Vacated
John Thune’s tenure as Senate Majority Leader is a disgrace, a glaring example of how Washington insiders prioritize self-preservation over the will of the people. By belittling the fight for election integrity as a fabricated “ecosystem” of influencers, he has spit in the face of the 77 million-plus Trump voters and the broader conservative coalition that demands action, not excuses.
This isn’t leadership; it’s sabotage. In a constitutional republic, where the legitimacy of government rests on the consent of the governed, dismissing voter concerns as paid propaganda erodes the very foundation of our democracy. Thune isn’t just wrong—he’s unfit.
It’s time for Thune to face the music: Step down immediately and let a true conservative warrior take the reins. If he refuses, Senate Republicans must summon the spine to vacate the chair, just as House conservatives did to oust Kevin McCarthy when he failed to deliver.
Anything less is a capitulation to the swamp, allowing Democrats to block vital reforms while illegals potentially sway elections and fraud festers unchecked.
The American people aren’t “paid influencers”—we’re the bosses. And we’re done with traitorous enablers like Thune. Remove him now, or risk losing the Senate and the republic along with it. The clock is ticking, Republicans: Act, or be replaced.
Iran – The bombs started falling in the Middle East, and within minutes the internet detonated with something just as explosive, a tidal wave of fake war footage across social media.
Scroll through Facebook, X or Instagram and you will see burning U.S. bases. Iranian missiles blasting American jets from the sky. Satellite images of destroyed radar installations. Clever Iranian tricks of a painted airplane silhouette – supposedly humiliating the Pentagon.
Much of it never happened.
Since the United States began striking Iranian targets, the online world has been flooded with fake accounts, AI-generated videos, manipulated satellite imagery, and viral propaganda posts designed to shape global opinion about the conflict. Analysts say the scale of the deception campaign marks one of the first major wars where artificial intelligence is being weaponized at industrial scale in the information space.
Millions Watching Fake War
The misinformation explosion began almost immediately after the strikes.
Researchers monitoring social media say fabricated videos of the war have accumulated tens of millions of views before fact-checkers could intervene. Some clips claimed to show Iranian missile strikes destroying American aircraft or warships.
One particularly dramatic video circulating online showed an Iranian missile destroying a U.S. aircraft in midair. The footage went viral, racking up tens of millions of views, before investigators determined it had been generated entirely using artificial intelligence.
Other viral clips were not even AI. They were lifted from military video games.
A widely shared video claiming to show a U.S. warship shooting down an Iranian fighter jet was eventually traced to gameplay footage from the combat simulation game War Thunder. The clip gained more than seven million views online before being exposed as fictional.
Experts say the tactic works because viewers often encounter these clips in emotionally charged moments, when verification is the last thing on their minds.
The Fake Account Armies
The deception is not random.
Investigators have uncovered organized networks of fake or hacked social media accounts pushing fabricated war footage to millions of users.
In one case uncovered by platform X, at least 31 coordinated accounts were allegedly operated by a man in Pakistan and used to spread AI-generated war videos related to the U.S. strikes on Iran.
Many of the accounts impersonated journalists or eyewitnesses. Some posed as residents near battle zones. Others claimed to be military observers.
By pretending to be on-the-ground witnesses, propagandists can trick audiences into believing fabricated videos are authentic breaking news.
Researchers say this kind of deception campaign is increasingly common during international conflicts, where online narratives can influence global opinion as quickly as military developments.
AI Is Now Faking Satellite Evidence
Perhaps the most alarming development is the manipulation of satellite imagery.
In several viral posts circulating online, images appeared to show U.S. military installations destroyed by Iranian strikes. The images looked convincing, complete with blast craters and damaged buildings.
Investigators later discovered some of the satellite images were AI-altered or entirely fabricated.
One widely shared image, promoted by Iranian media outlets, claimed to show a devastated U.S. radar installation in Qatar. Analysts later determined the image had been digitally manipulated using artificial intelligence.
Experts warn that satellite images are particularly powerful propaganda tools because they appear technical and authoritative.
People tend to trust them without question.
Viral Claims Iran Is Tricking U.S. Satellites
Another category of viral propaganda has taken a different approach, mockery.
Images circulating across social media show large silhouettes of drones and aircraft painted onto the ground inside Iran. The accompanying posts claim Iranian forces created fake targets to trick American satellites.
The narrative accompanying the images is clear and deliberate. According to the viral captions, U.S. intelligence supposedly identifies the fake aircraft as real targets, allowing Iran to make the United States waste millions of dollars destroying empty patches of dirt.
The posts typically end with the same message, Iran is clever, the United States is foolish.
But military historians say the narrative leaves out a key fact. This never happened…the images are Photoshop or A.I..
The deception, to the viewers, is effective because decoys, camouflage, and deception have been standard military tactics for centuries. Inflatable tanks, fake airfields, and painted aircraft silhouettes were used extensively during World War II and are taught in military academies around the world. So the accusations seem plausible…and the fake images seal the deal.
The propaganda lies not in the existence of decoys, but in the framing designed to humiliate the United States and elevate Iran’s image.
State Actors Fuel the Propaganda War
Analysts say the information battlefield is being shaped by a mix of actors.
State-backed propaganda networks have circulated exaggerated claims about Iranian military success, while foreign influence operations have amplified misleading narratives to undermine confidence in American military power. Anti-semite groups capitalize on the opportunity to take swipes at Israel. Democrat operatives live for the opportunity to make President Trump, or Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, look like a fool.
Researchers studying the phenomenon say the goal is not always to persuade people of a single lie. Instead, the objective is chaos & uncertainty.
Flood the internet with so many competing claims, fake videos, and manipulated images that ordinary people simply stop trusting anything they see.
Opinion: America Is Losing the Information Battlefield
Facts first. Now the uncomfortable truth.
The United States may dominate the skies militarily, but in the information war raging across social media, the battlefield is far murkier.
Artificial intelligence has democratized propaganda. What once required vast intelligence agencies, professional studios, and technical expertise can now be created by anyone with a laptop and the right software.
The viral posts mocking American intelligence over painted decoys illustrate the strategy perfectly. A centuries-old military tactic becomes a viral story about Iranian brilliance and American incompetence.
The objective is not accuracy. The objective is perception.
Every fake video of a burning U.S. base, every manipulated satellite image, every anonymous account posting dramatic “battle footage” pushes the same narrative, America is losing, Iran is winning, and nothing you see can be trusted.
And when truth becomes impossible to separate from fiction, propaganda has already won.
The missiles may be flying over the Middle East.
But the real war for public perception is raging on your phone screen.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login