Texas Rep. Kay Granger Refuses Censure of Adam Schiff
Texas Rep. Kay Granger refuses to censure Adam Schiff after he lied to the American People.
In the intricate web of American politics, every vote cast by an elected representative carries significant weight. Each decision can shape the trajectory of the nation, influence public opinion, and even determine the course of a political career. Rep. Kay Granger, a prominent Republican from Texas, recently found herself under intense scrutiny when she voted against the censure of Rep. Adam Schiff, a move that drew sharp criticism from fellow lawmakers and constituents alike. This controversial stance has sparked a wave of disappointment among Texas Republicans and has raised concerns about her commitment to holding elected officials accountable for their perceived unethical actions.
The Background
The contentious move to censure Rep. Adam Schiff emanates from allegations of misconduct and a perceived lack of integrity in his handling of classified information. Furthermore, Rep. Schiff has been accused of making deliberately false public statements regarding the alleged “Russian Collusion” narrative against former President Donald Trump. Many lawmakers, both Republican and Democrat, saw the censure as a necessary step to restore ethical standards and ensure public trust in the political process.
Rep. Granger’s Opposition
Rep. Kay Granger’s decision to oppose the censure of Rep. Schiff has left many questioning her judgment, principles, and loyalty to the American people. Critics argue that by refusing to support accountability measures against Rep. Schiff, she is undermining the integrity of the House of Representatives and sending a troubling message that Congress members may believe themselves to be above the law.
One of the primary concerns raised by Rep. Granger’s opposition to the censure is the potential impact on the ethical standards expected of elected officials. The core tenet of representative democracy is that lawmakers should be held accountable for their actions and decisions. When a representative, such as Rep. Schiff, faces credible allegations of misconduct, it is incumbent upon their peers to investigate and take appropriate action. Rep. Granger’s vote against censure has ignited a fierce debate about whether elected officials should be held to the same ethical standards as the citizens they represent.
Constituents’ Disappointment
Moreover, Rep. Granger’s actions appear to be in stark contrast with the sentiments of her constituents, who expect their elected representative to prioritize ethical conduct and demonstrate a steadfast commitment to upholding high standards in public office. Serving the 12th district of Texas for an impressive 27 years, Rep. Granger has enjoyed a long and successful political career. However, her recent vote has sparked a significant demand for legislation that would enact term limits for members of Congress.
The Texas Liberty Journal contacted Mrs. Granger’s office by phone for comment. However, as of the publication of this article, she remained unresponsive. Furthermore, her official website has implemented restrictions, preventing individuals residing outside her district from contacting her directly. All emails sent to her office are directed to her assistant, who has thus far refused to provide any comment on Rep. Granger’s controversial vote.
Understanding Rep. Granger’s Position
To provide a comprehensive understanding of Rep. Granger’s position, it is essential to explore the factors that may have influenced her decision to oppose the censure of Rep. Schiff.
- Establishment Loyalty: In today’s highly polarized political climate, loyalty to one’s party often plays a significant role in lawmakers’ decisions. Rep. Granger’s allegiance to the establishment may have swayed her vote.
- Concerns about Due Process: Some argue that Rep. Granger’s opposition to censure might be rooted in a belief in the importance of due process. They may argue that allegations against Rep. Schiff should be thoroughly investigated before punitive measures are taken.
- Political Calculations: Elected officials often make decisions based on the potential impact on their political careers. Rep. Granger, with her extensive experience, may have calculated that supporting the censure could have adverse effects on her standing within the Establishment Republican Party, and her chances of re-election.
- Constituent Pressure: While Rep. Granger’s vote has disappointed many constituents, it is possible that she faces pressure from a specific segment of her district that supports Rep. Schiff and opposes his censure.
- Personal Convictions: Lawmakers occasionally vote against their party or popular opinion due to deeply held personal convictions. Rep. Granger may genuinely believe that censure is not the appropriate response to Rep. Schiff’s actions.
The Call for Term Limits
One unexpected consequence of Rep. Granger’s controversial vote has been a growing demand for term limits for members of Congress. Term limits have long been a topic of debate in American politics, with proponents arguing that they can bring fresh perspectives, prevent entrenched political power, and reduce the influence of special interests.
In Rep. Granger’s case, her lengthy tenure in Congress has come under scrutiny due to her opposition to the censure of Rep. Schiff. Many Texans, including those who have supported her in the past, now question whether long-serving representatives become disconnected from the needs and values of their constituents. This debate over term limits has taken center stage in discussions about the future of American democracy and the role of career politicians in shaping its destiny.
The Texas Liberty Journal’s Efforts
The Texas Liberty Journal, as a responsible and conscientious source of political news and analysis, reached out to Rep. Granger’s office to seek her perspective on the controversial vote. Unfortunately, her lack of response has left many constituents and observers disappointed. In a democracy, transparency and communication between elected officials and the public are crucial elements in maintaining trust and accountability.
The restriction on communication via her official website, which limits contact to residents of her district, has also drawn attention. While it is customary for constituents to have direct access to their representatives, this practice has raised concerns about transparency and accountability. In an age of increasing digital connectivity, such restrictions may be viewed as an attempt to control the narrative and limit engagement with a broader audience.
The controversy surrounding Rep. Kay Granger’s decision to oppose the censure of Rep. Adam Schiff has ignited a passionate debate about ethics, accountability, and the role of long-serving representatives in American politics. While her vote may have been influenced by various factors, including party loyalty and personal convictions, it has left her constituents and the broader public questioning the integrity of their elected officials.
Moreover, the call for term limits in Congress has gained momentum, with Rep. Granger’s lengthy tenure serving as a focal point for this discussion. The Texas Liberty Journal’s efforts to seek her perspective and the limitations on communication through her official channels have further fueled the controversy.
As this debate continues to unfold, it serves as a reminder of the profound impact that individual votes can have on the perception of elected officials and the direction of our democracy. The scrutiny faced by Rep. Granger is a testament to the importance of ethical conduct, accountability, and open dialogue in the realm of American politics.
Austin
Texas GOP Wants Closed Primaries. New Secretary of State Robert Howden Is Preparing to Fight Them.
Austin, TX – Texas Republicans spent years demanding control of their own primary. Now they have a new Secretary of State, Robert S. Howden, appointed by Republican Governor Greg Abbott, and the man taking over the state’s election machinery is inheriting a lawsuit in which his office is expected to defend the very open primary system the GOP wants to dismantle.
The Republican Party of Texas filed the federal lawsuit in September 2025, arguing that Texas’ open primary system violates the party’s First Amendment right of association. Under the current system, Texas voters do not register by party and may choose which party’s primary to vote in during an election cycle. The GOP wants only registered Republicans participating in Republican primaries.
The case is pending in federal court in Amarillo before U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk.
And Robert S. Howden has now inherited it.
Howden Steps Into the Fight
Gov. Abbott appointed Howden as Texas’ 116th secretary of state on July 17, effective July 18. Howden previously served as Abbott’s senior adviser and director of legislative affairs and has worked in the administrations of four Republican governors. As secretary of state, he is Texas’ chief elections officer.
Abbott has been quite clear about where he stands.
At the 2026 Republican Party convention, he said Texas would eventually make clear that “only Republicans vote in Republican primaries.” Abbott has also said lawmakers “can and should be more responsive to Republicans than a judge may be,” indicating that he expects the Legislature to address the issue during the 2027 session.
But that doesn’t mean the Secretary of State’s office is supposed to simply surrender in court.
That was the position taken by Howden’s predecessor, Jane Nelson.
Nelson argued that changing Texas’ primary system was a job for the Legislature, not a federal judge. In an October 2025 statement, she said it was her responsibility to defend existing election laws and that she would implement whatever changes the Legislature lawfully enacted.
The Attorney General’s office took the opposite position.
Attorney General Ken Paxton sided with the Texas GOP, asking the federal court to strike down portions of the Texas Election Code governing open primaries. According to reporting by The Texas Tribune, Nelson’s lawyers said Paxton’s office gave them less than an hour’s notice before taking the opposing position.
So the Republican Party sued the Republican-controlled state government. The Republican Attorney General joined the plaintiffs. And the Republican Secretary of State fought the lawsuit.
That’s not exactly the tidy party unity politicians like to advertise.
The Real Fight Is Over Who Controls the Nomination
The GOP argues that crossover voting allows Democrats and independents to influence Republican nominations, potentially helping candidates who are less conservative than the party base.
The lawsuit specifically pointed to the 2024 Republican primaries involving former House Speaker Dade Phelan and Rep. Gary VanDeaver. Both won their races by fewer than 800 votes, and the party argued that crossover voters helped determine the outcomes.
The party has already made closing primaries an official priority. Republicans adopted rules supporting closed primaries in 2024 and renewed that push at their 2026 convention.
But changing the system is not as simple as flipping a switch.
Texas has more than 18 million registered voters, and the state’s registration system was never designed around party registration. Moving to closed primaries could require new registration procedures, computer-system changes and a method for existing voters to establish party affiliation.
The GOP wants the courts to clear the way, preferably in time for 2028.
Art & Culture
McKinney Approves Controversial Islamic Center After Marathon Meeting That Exposed Deep Divisions
McKinney, TX – After nearly six hours of emotional testimony, shouted applause, boos, and police intervention, the McKinney City Council unanimously approved plans Tuesday night for a new Islamic center, closing another chapter in a debate that has simmered in Collin County for years. The vote may have been unanimous, but it certainly wasn’t uncontroversial.
Just before 11:30 p.m. on August 4, the council voted 7-0 to approve the site plan for the McKinney Islamic Association‘s proposed campus on roughly 5.5 acres at Virginia Parkway and Crutcher Crossing. City officials repeatedly emphasized that the decision before them was not whether Islam should have a place of worship in McKinney, but whether the submitted site plan complied with existing city ordinances and development standards. According to council members, the property’s current planned development zoning already permits religious assembly, leaving the city with little legal discretion to deny an otherwise compliant application.
The approved project includes a roughly 15,000-square-foot sanctuary, a classroom building of approximately 10,000 square feet, a 7,000-square-foot multi-purpose gymnasium, parking, and related site improvements. The McKinney Islamic Association says its current facility, where it has served the community for decades, can no longer accommodate its growing congregation.
The meeting itself became the story.
More than 150 people registered to speak, forcing city officials to delay the start of the regular meeting while names were entered into the system. Supporters and opponents packed the council chambers, overflow rooms, and hallways, creating an atmosphere that multiple local news outlets described as tense and, at times, hostile.
Opponents raised a mix of concerns.
Some focused squarely on practical issues, including increased traffic, parking shortages, neighborhood compatibility, and whether a campus serving large numbers of worshippers could comfortably fit on the site. Others voiced broader objections rooted in concerns about Islamic doctrine, Sharia law, and the changing cultural landscape of North Texas. Congressman Keith Self, whose district includes McKinney, spoke against the proposal before public testimony began, warning of dangers he associates with extremist interpretations of Islam.
Supporters argued that the project involved a long-established congregation simply seeking room to grow. They pointed to constitutional protections for religious liberty and rejected accusations directed toward the association as prejudice against Muslim residents. Veterans, longtime community members, and faith leaders urged the council to evaluate the application based on municipal law rather than religious disagreement.
Former McKinney Mayor George Fuller received one of the night’s harshest public receptions after speaking in support of the project. He was booed by portions of the crowd, and according to WFAA, police escorted him from the building after a woman reportedly shoved a sign reading “Don’t Sharia My Texas” into his shirt while he exited the meeting.
Despite the emotional testimony, council members repeatedly returned to the same legal conclusion, the site plan either met the city’s development requirements or it did not. Planning and Zoning had already recommended approval in July, and council members indicated denying a compliant application would almost certainly expose the city to litigation it was unlikely to win. Previous proposals involving substantially larger facilities required rezoning and were rejected, but the revised plan fits within the property’s existing zoning framework.
The approval does not authorize immediate construction. The project must still complete platting requirements, undergo a traffic study, and obtain building permits before construction can begin.
Below is the list of the current city council that voted 7/0 to approve the project.
| Member Name | Title | |
|---|---|---|
| Bill Cox | Mayor | |
| Rick Franklin | Mayor Pro Tem – District 4 | |
| Justin Beller | Council Member – District 1 | |
| Patrick Cloutier | Council Member – District 2 | |
| Geré Feltus | Council Member – District 3 | |
| Ernest Lynch | Council Member – At Large 1 | |
| Michael Jones | Council Member – At Large 2 |
Austin
‘The Taxpayer’s Comptroller’: Don Huffines Sworn In, Refuses Salary and Pledges to Slash Waste
Austin, TX — Don Huffines officially took the oath of office Saturday as Texas Comptroller, beginning his tenure as the state’s chief financial officer with a series of promises aimed squarely at fiscal conservatives: refuse a taxpayer-funded salary, root out government waste, pursue additional property tax relief, and faithfully administer Texas’ new school choice program.
Huffines was sworn into office after being appointed by Gov. Greg Abbott to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of former Comptroller Kelly Hancock. As Comptroller, Huffines will oversee the state’s accounting systems, tax collections, revenue estimates, and fiscal management while serving as one of Texas’ highest-ranking statewide officials.
The ceremony marks the beginning of Huffines’ service as comptroller ahead of the November general election, where he will appear on the ballot seeking a full term against Democratic nominee and State Sen. Sarah Eckhardt. Entering the race as the incumbent provides Huffines with both the visibility and responsibilities that come with holding statewide office.
Refusing a Taxpayer-Funded Salary
One of Huffines’ first announcements after taking office was that he will not accept the Comptroller’s salary.
The decision mirrors his previous service in the Texas Senate, where he also declined compensation, arguing that public office should be about serving Texans rather than collecting a government paycheck.
“I will not accept a salary,” Huffines said, emphasizing his belief that elected officials should demonstrate fiscal restraint beginning with themselves.
While the Comptroller’s salary represents only a tiny fraction of the state’s overall budget, the move is intended to reinforce Huffines’ message that government leaders should model the same financial discipline they expect from taxpayers.
Property Tax Relief Remains Top Priority
Huffines also made clear that reducing Texans’ property tax burden will be one of his central objectives.
Although the Comptroller does not directly set property tax rates, the office plays a significant role in state finances and revenue forecasting. Huffines said he intends to use the position to encourage local governments to reduce property taxes instead of expanding spending as state sales tax revenues continue to grow.
Property taxes have become one of the most contentious issues in Texas politics in recent years. Despite multiple rounds of tax relief approved by the Legislature, many homeowners have continued to see rising tax bills due to increasing property values and local government spending.
Huffines has long advocated for more aggressive property tax reductions and used his swearing-in ceremony to reaffirm that commitment.
Promising a More Aggressive Watchdog
Beyond taxes, Huffines pledged to aggressively identify wasteful government spending.
He said the Comptroller’s office should function as a watchdog over taxpayer dollars, focusing on eliminating waste, fraud, abuse, and unnecessary expenditures throughout state government.
The comments are consistent with Huffines’ long-standing reputation as one of the Legislature’s more fiscally conservative voices and suggest he intends to bring a more activist approach to the Comptroller’s office than simply managing the state’s books.
As the state’s chief financial officer, the Comptroller prepares revenue estimates that guide legislative budgeting and oversees billions of dollars in state finances, giving the office substantial influence over fiscal policy even without direct legislative authority.
School Choice Program Now Under His Oversight
Huffines also assumes responsibility for overseeing the financial administration of Texas’ new Education Freedom Account program, one of Gov. Abbott’s signature legislative accomplishments.
The program allows qualifying families to use state funds for approved educational expenses outside the traditional public school system. Because the Comptroller’s office is responsible for administering the program’s financial operations, Huffines will immediately play a central role in ensuring the initiative functions as intended.
Supporters view the program as expanding educational opportunities and parental choice, while critics have questioned its impact on public education funding. Regardless of the political debate, the Comptroller’s office will be responsible for ensuring taxpayer dollars are properly managed and accounted for.
Abbott Praises Huffines’ Private-Sector Experience
Gov. Greg Abbott praised Huffines during the transition, pointing to his business background and commitment to conservative fiscal principles.
Abbott has said Huffines’ experience in the private sector makes him well suited to oversee the state’s finances and continue Texas’ reputation for responsible fiscal management.
Huffines built his career in real estate development before entering public service and previously represented portions of Dallas County in the Texas Senate.
Looking Toward November
Although Huffines is now serving as Comptroller, Texas voters will still decide in November who will hold the office for the coming term.
His appointment gives Republicans an incumbent candidate heading into the election while allowing Huffines to begin implementing his priorities immediately rather than waiting until after Election Day.
His opening message leaves little doubt about the direction he intends to take the office: emphasizing smaller government, increased accountability, reduced spending, and continued efforts to lower the tax burden on Texans.
Whether those priorities translate into measurable policy changes will become clearer in the months ahead, but Huffines began his tenure with a clear signal to taxpayers that he intends to make fiscal conservatism the defining theme of his administration.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login