Weaponization of Government in Fate, TX
Did city attorney Jon Thatcher deliberately mislead our City Council into voting for an Ordinance to grant every city department to write citations? It would appear so.
On August 7, 2023, at the City Council meeting, an alarming ordinance was unveiled that could shake the very foundations of the freedoms we hold dear. City Attorney Jon Thatcher presented Ordinance No. O-2023-022, a seemingly innocuous “Citation Program,” with a sinister underbelly that threatens to weaponize our government against its own citizens.
Under the cloak of vague language, Thatcher’s proposal allows designated individuals to wield the authority of criminal citations. While he assured the council with direct statements that this ordinance would be confined to the Community Services and Public Works departments, the written text of the ordinance tells a different story. The deliberately ambiguous wording opens the floodgates for any department director to unleash this power. The main paragraph of the ordinance reads (emphasis added):
“In addition to any express authority provided in this Code, the director of the City departments including Community Services and Public Works may issue one or more citations to a person to appear in Municipal Court, if the director reasonably believes that the person has engaged in conduct that violates a law or ordinance that relates to the operations of the department for which the director is responsible as assigned by the City Manager.”
Section 1-16 b(1)
Nowhere in the ordinance is there any sort of exclusionary language to limit the ordinance to the two departments as portrayed by Jon Thatcher. However, at least some of the Council believed that there was.
Council Member Heather Buegeler’s casual remark during the meeting exposes the deception at play in real time – she acknowledged the change in the ordinance’s scope, echoing Thatcher’s false representation. “I would have approved this the last time”, she said. Tepid laughter ensued from the council after her remark. Her words mirror the depth of the issue at hand, where misdirection hides behind eloquent assurances.
An Inescapable Crisis
The Council’s unanimous approval of this proposal raises questions about their accountability. Their actions and explanations, while revealing their intentions, fail to justify the lack of scrutiny given to the ordinance’s language. Mayor Pro Tem Allen Robbins, Councilman Scott Kelley, Councilman Lance Megyesi, and Councilman Mark Harper each shared their perspective in response to our inquiry.
- Mayor Pro Tem Allen Robbins – “We currently have code enforcement and citation authority in building inspection, structure, construction, streets, animal control, fire, water and sewer but none for storm water. To enforce existing ordinances, I voted in favor to codify the enforcement/citation program to remain consistent across all departments and services. Nothing changes to existing ordinances, violations or penalties. Only the ordinance granting enforcement and citation to the experts in the field.”
- Councilman Scott Kelley – “Regarding my vote on item 6d: I supported this item as a way to streamline and speed up the process to address code enforcement issues. By allowing this process we can more quickly address issues like stormwater runoff that have impacted several areas in town recently, especially our older neighborhoods but also in our developments where corporate owners may be incented to not address issues timely. I am for having efficient processes to address issues that can create significant pain points for our homeowners and residents.”
- Councilman Lance Megyesi – “Ordinance 2023-022 will codify the delegation of such authority to code enforcement officers and will additionally authorize specific employees within the public works department to issue citations for violations limited to the City’s ordinances regulating the City’s stormwater management program.”
- Councilman Mark Harper – “My vote was yes. I voted yes because this is needed for the efficient operation of the city in the sewer and storm water area. I feel sufficient checks and balances are in the ordinance to provide the best service to residents without the ability to overreach authority.”
Mr. Robbins, later responded in a follow up email that he, “… read and understand all ordinances I vote on. No exceptions. Your assertion that I voted based on “verbal assurances” is completely wrong and without fact. My previous reply stands. The ability to safeguard our community and enforce existing ordinances with a citation program is needed”.
The following represents analysis and interpretation based on public records, statements, and observations.
So this basically means that he completely understood that Mr. Thatcher was misrepresenting the language of the ordinance. It raises questions about whether miscommunication or deeper coordination may have influenced the vote, which warrants further scrutiny. One could only wonder what the legal implications of this might be.
The other explanations may be proof that they based their vote on false representations made by Mr. Thatcher. Indeed, one can only view the recorded video on the town’s website to see the misrepresentations made by Mr. Thatcher. You can view the video for yourself here: https://fatetx.new.swagit.com/videos/268576 The agenda item is 6D and the video begins at about 2:15:00 in the player.
The Crossroads We Face
This isn’t merely a case of miscommunication or misinterpretation; it’s an issue of the utmost importance for our community. Aside from Mr. Robbins, did the Council members genuinely overlook the language, or was their vote a result of more troubling collusion? We must ponder whether ignorance or collusion is the greater evil.
Furthermore, Mr. Thatcher’s response to our email inquiry was simply to send us a copy of the ordinance and direct our attention to the very paragraph that indicates the conflict between his statements and the written language. He did not provide a substantive explanation when requested, leaving room for interpretation about his intentions. The absence of a straightforward explanation raises pertinent questions about his intent or ignorance in this matter.
The lack of clarification by Mr. Thatcher fuels concerns that his veiled language and obfuscation were likely purposeful, leaving the community to grapple with uncertainty and unease. As a city, we deserve clarity, transparency, and accountability from those entrusted with our governance.
The truth is clear – Mr. Thatcher’s deliberate obfuscation demands action. Whether he intentionally misled the Council or incompetently drafted the ordinance, his role in this matter is untenable. He must be held accountable. Admonishment must also be given to the council by the citizens, for they have failed in their duty to vet the facts of what they are voting on.
The ordinance’s passage under false pretenses, if not to the Council itself, but most assuredly to the People, is an affront to the principles of honesty and transparency that our city deserves. If even a single Council member sees the deception, they must demand immediate repeal of the ordinance.
Preserving Our Community’s Integrity
The implications of this ordinance are dire. This ordinance is not limited to a single department or a specific violation, despite claims to the contrary. It opens the door to a future where any city director can wield the sword of citations against us. Imagine facing criminal charges for the slightest infraction, with escalating fines accruing daily that could spiral into the thousands. This isn’t the community we envision.
This isn’t about partisan politics or bureaucratic jargon. It’s about safeguarding the sanctity of our community and the freedom of its citizens. The weaponization of government against its own people is a harrowing reality we cannot ignore. Lest we forget, our elected leaders are supposed to represent the People, NOT the City. It’s not their job to put in an efficient, fast lane for city employees to persecute citizens.
It falls upon each of us to rise, unite, and demand accountability. Our voices, our unity, can be the catalyst for change. Let’s hold our leaders accountable, ensure transparency, and prevent the weaponization of our government against its citizens.
The choice is ours – to either allow deception and unchecked power to erode our community’s foundation or to stand strong and fight for the future we deserve.
###
We only publish verifiable content. You may find the entire ordinance here: https://www.fatetx.gov/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Item/10004?fileID=31083
You can find the video here: https://fatetx.new.swagit.com/videos/268576
Our email correspondence is documented and quoted, however it’s not conducive to publish them all in their entirety. We will however retain the records for litigation if it is ever required or if it is requested by a court of law.
Editors Note:
This article reports on Ordinance No. O-2023-022 using public records, video recordings, and documented correspondence. Sections labeled “Analysis” represent the author’s interpretation of events and do not assert the personal intent or misconduct of named officials. All factual references—including ordinance language and council statements—are verifiable through the provided links.
Fate, TX
Fate Council Approves Settlement in Former DPS Chief Lyle Lombard’s Wrongful Termination Dispute
Fate, TX — The Fate City Council voted Monday night to approve a proposed settlement with former Department of Public Safety Chief Lyle Lombard, bringing what has been a months-long wrongful termination dispute one step closer to resolution.
The vote of 4 to approve and 2 abstentions followed an executive session in which council members met privately with legal counsel to discuss the arbitration matter. Returning to open session, the council approved the settlement, though the financial terms and other provisions of the agreement were not disclosed during the public meeting.
The settlement resolves Lombard’s wrongful termination claim, which has been proceeding through arbitration following his separation from the City of Fate. Unlike traditional court proceedings, arbitration generally occurs outside public view, leaving many details of the dispute undisclosed unless the parties choose to release them or disclosure is otherwise required by law.
As of publication, the City has not released the settlement agreement, and it remains unclear whether the document contains confidentiality provisions or other restrictions governing what information may become public. It is also unknown whether the agreement includes any admission of liability by either party, the amount of any monetary payments, or other negotiated terms.
Lombard served as the City’s Department of Public Safety Chief before his separation from the City, a decision that ultimately resulted in the arbitration proceedings. The dispute drew considerable public attention as questions surrounding the circumstances of his departure remained largely unanswered because of the confidential nature of the arbitration process.
Monday night’s vote concludes the council’s role in approving the negotiated resolution, but it may not immediately answer many of the questions residents have asked throughout the dispute. Depending on the terms of the agreement and applicable provisions of the Texas Public Information Act, some portions of the settlement could eventually become public, while other details may remain confidential if protected by law.
Pipkins Reports has submitted requests for records related to the settlement and will review any documents released by the City. Those records may provide additional information regarding the financial impact of the agreement, the obligations of each party, and the extent to which the dispute has been fully resolved.
Neither the City of Fate nor Lombard publicly commented on the settlement during Monday night’s meeting.
While the approval brings the arbitration to a close, it also marks the end of one of the most closely watched employment disputes in recent City history. Whether additional information becomes available will likely depend on the release of public records, the language of the settlement agreement, and any future statements made by the parties.
Pipkins Reports will continue following the story and will publish updates as additional records become available.
Fate, TX
Exposed: City of Fate Withholds Documents from Disclosure Without Permission From Attorney General
Ethics Investigation Raises New Questions About Fate’s Response to Open Records Request
Fate, TX — An ethics investigation into former Fate City Councilwoman Codi Chinn has uncovered evidence suggesting the City of Fate possessed at least one employee complaint against former Department of Public Safety Chief Lyle Lombard that it never disclosed in response to an Open Records Request submitted by Pipkins Reports.
The newly released investigative report also raises additional questions about whether City Manager Michael Kovacs fully described his receipt of employee complaint letters during his interview with the City’s outside investigator.
The documents establish the following timeline.
On November 25, 2025, Pipkins Reports submitted a Texas Public Information Act request seeking four categories of records related to Chief Lombard’s employment. Item No. 3 requested:
“Copy of any written complaints against Chief Lombard within the last 12 months prior to termination.”
On December 11, 2025, the City responded by producing Chief Lombard’s performance evaluations, termination documents, and the investigation initiated by City Manager Michael Kovacs. However, the city produced no employee complaint letters.
Because no complaint letters were produced, Pipkins Reports immediately contacted the City for clarification. The follow-up specifically noted that an anonymous employee complaint concerning Lombard had already become publicly known and requested that letter, along with any other anonymous or signed complaints concerning the former chief.
On December 16th, after Pipkins Reports challenged the City’s original response, Associate Attorney Paige Goins of Messer Fort acknowledged that one document—the anonymous letter already known to exist—had been inadvertently omitted and she sent that document to Pipkins Reports.
Then, on December 18, the City supplemented its response again by producing awards and commendations received by Lombard.
At the time, Pipkins Reports did not pursue the matter further. New information obtained through a subsequent ethics investigation has now renewed serious questions about whether the City’s response complied with the Texas Public Information Act.
Under the Texas Public Information Act, governmental bodies generally must either promptly produce responsive public records or seek a ruling from the Texas Attorney General if they believe the requested information falls within an exception to disclosure. If a governmental body fails to timely request an Attorney General ruling, the requested information is generally presumed to be public unless a compelling reason exists to withhold it. See Texas Government Code §§ 552.221, 552.301, and 552.302.
In this case, the City did not seek an Attorney General ruling authorizing its withholding of any documents.
Ethics Investigation Reveals New Information
Seven months later, in July of 2026, an unrelated ethics investigation would reveal information that casts new light on the City’s response.
The investigation originated from an ethics complaint filed by Fate resident Darcy Gildon, who alleged former Councilwoman Codi Chinn improperly involved herself in personnel matters by directing city employees to prepare written complaints concerning Chief Lombard.
Attorney Laura Mueller of Baker Robertson & O’Brien ultimately concluded that Chinn violated Section 2-309(10) of the city’s Code of Ethics by directing employees to provide information to her in writing. Pipkins Reports reported on that story … here.
More significant for purposes of this investigation, however, were the interviews conducted with the individuals involved.
According to the investigative report, Chinn told investigators that city employees approached her seeking assistance. She stated that she instructed them to put their concerns in writing so they could be presented to the City Council. Instead, according to her interview, the employees compiled a letter addressed to the entire City Council, after which she instructed them to deliver the letter to City Manager Michael Kovacs.
The investigative report summarizes Kovacs’ interview as follows:
“In my interview with Mr. Kovacs, we discussed his conversations with then Councilmember Chinn and the employees. Mr. Kovacs stated that he received the letter outlining the employee issues directly from an officer, but with the understanding that the information was given to him at the direction of Ms. Chinn. Mr. Kovacs also stated that Ms. Chinn kept him informed of the conversations she was having with the employees, but that he warned her against such communications.”
The report, however, does not discuss the original anonymous complaint letter that Pipkins Reports previously reported had been delivered to Kovacs through Councilwoman Chinn.
Taken together, the report’s statements—and its omissions—appear to indicate that Kovacs possessed at least two written employee complaints that would have been responsive to Pipkins Reports’ November 2025 Public Information Act request.
Two Letters, One Unanswered Question
Pipkins Reports has independently obtained copies of both complaint letters from sources outside City Hall. One anonymous letter begins with the words, “To Whom It May Concern.” The second letter is addressed to the entire City Council and was reportedly transmitted through Councilwoman Chinn.
Their existence, however, does not resolve whether the City complied with the Texas Public Information Act. The central question is whether the City properly disclosed responsive records in response to a lawful request.
As of this publication, the City still has not disclosed the separate complaint letter that Kovacs later acknowledged receiving directly from a police officer. By his own admission, City Manager Michael Kovacs is the person responsible for the dissemination of records per State Law, and therefore he is the person who should be held accountable.
If Kovacs’ statement to investigators is accurate, that second complaint letter would have existed when the City’s response to the November 2025 Public Information Act request was prepared.
A New Public Information Request
In light of the newly disclosed information, Pipkins Reports has submitted another Texas Public Information Act request seeking all written complaints concerning Chief Lombard, including the complaint letter Kovacs acknowledged receiving from an officer, the complaint letter transmitted through Councilwoman Chinn, and any additional written complaints in the City’s possession.
The request states, in part:
“On 11/25/2025, as part of Open Records Request #R001735-112525, I requested ‘Copy of any written complaints against Chief Lombard within the last 12 months prior to termination.’ The City failed to provide any responsive documents, even though it was publicly known that at least one anonymous complaint letter existed.
During the ethics investigation conducted by Baker Robertson & O’Brien, Michael Kovacs stated that he received a complaint letter from a police officer. This admission indicates the City possessed an additional responsive document that was not disclosed.
The City did not seek an Attorney General ruling authorizing the withholding of either complaint letter. This request seeks both documents, together with any additional written complaints concerning Chief Lombard.”
Whether the City ultimately produces the records—or explains why they were not disclosed nearly eight months ago—may determine whether this story ends as an administrative oversight or raises more significant questions regarding the City’s compliance with the Texas Public Information Act.
This remains an ongoing investigation. Pipkins Reports will continue to report on developments as additional records become available.
Fate Council Dropped Case Before Reviewing
Fate, TX — An ethics investigation commissioned by the City of Fate concluded that former Councilwoman Codi Chinn violated the City’s Code of Ethics before the City Council voted earlier this month to discontinue the matter, according to documents obtained by Pipkins Reports through an Open Records Request.
The report, prepared by attorney Laura Mueller of the law firm Baker, Robertson & O’Brien, found that the allegation against Chinn was “substantiated, but with mitigating factors.”
The Executive Summary states:
“After investigation, my determination is that allegation of a violation of the Ethics Code is substantiated, but with mitigating factors.”
The report concludes that Chinn violated Section 2-309(10) of the City’s Code of Ethics after directing City employees to provide their concerns to her in writing.
“After reviewing the Charter, the Code of Ethics, and reviewing all of the evidence, my conclusion is that Ms. Chinn violated Section 2-309(10) of the Code of Ethics when she directed employees to provide information to her in writing.”
Mueller also concluded that mitigating circumstances should be considered because Chinn immediately informed City Manager Michael Kovacs about the employee concerns and because the employees ultimately submitted their written complaints directly to the City.
Council Ends Investigation
The ethics complaint summary report was scheduled to appear on the July 6 City Council agenda for executive session discussion.
Instead of going into Executive Session, the Council waived deliberative privilege and discussed the matter in open session where they ultimately voted to discontinue the ethics proceedings and drop the matter, before being presented with the findings from Mueller.
The Council did not impose any sanction against Chinn.
The following day, Pipkins Reports requested a copy of the complaint and the investigative report, and received it through an Open Records Request.
Investigation Details
According to the report, investigators interviewed Chinn, Councilman Mark Harper, City Manager Michael Kovacs, and other witnesses.
Regarding the allegations, Mueller wrote:
“In my interview with Ms. Chinn and Mr. Harper, we discussed the allegation. I questioned Ms. Chinn about her conversations with city employees and with Mr. Kovacs.”
According to the report, Chinn stated that city employees approached her seeking assistance and that she intended to present their concerns to the City Manager after compiling the information.
However, the report states that employees instead prepared a letter addressed to the City Council. Chinn then instructed them to provide the letter directly to the City Manager.
The report also summarizes Kovacs’ account of the events.
“Mr. Kovacs stated that he received the letter outlining the employee issues directly from an officer, but with the understanding that the information was given to him at the direction of Ms. Chinn.”
Previously, it was reported that Chinn provided a copy of an, “anonymous letter”, that she claims was provided by DPS officers to her. Chinn further states that she sent the letter to Michael Kovacs … who then forwarded it on to the rest of the Council. This report also states that Kovacs told investigators he had warned Chinn against communicating with employees in that manner.
Pipkins Reports continues to investigate this aspect of the situation … as the conditions shed new light on the events that have transpired with regard to the termination of DPS Chief Lyle Lombard.
Meanwhile, the city council’s decision effectively ended the ethics proceeding against Chinn without imposing any sanction or issuing any formal determination of its own regarding the investigator’s findings. While the Council possessed the authority to discontinue the matter, the decision also brought the ethics process to a close despite an independent investigation concluding that a violation of the City’s Code of Ethics had occurred.
For the complainant, Darcy Gildon, the Council’s action marked the end of a process that resulted in no public accountability beyond the release of the investigative report which Pipkins Reports has now provided.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login