The What-If Chronicles: A Potential Constitutional Crisis in the 2024 Election
What if: Harris Becomes President after Votes Have Been Cast for Biden?
With Joe Biden’s age and obvious health concerns at center stage in the election, questions about the continuity of the presidency and the electoral process could lead to a bonafide Constitutional Crisis. If, in this hypothetical scenario, President Biden were to resign or be removed from office right before election day, after votes have been cast in early voting, the nation could face an unprecedented constitutional crisis.
Following the provisions of the 25th Amendment, Vice President Harris would ascend to the presidency, the minute Biden is no longer able to fulfill his duties. At a minimum, she would remain President up until the transfer of power the following January. But it’s the timing of this hypothetical event that causes the issue, with a significant portion of the electorate having expressed their choices through early voting.
In this scenario, Harris’ name will not be on the ballot as a “Presidential” candidate. At best, she would be listed as the “Vice President” … assuming Biden continues to keep her on his ticket. At the time of this writing, it looks like he will.
But what happens in the election if Biden is unable to continue? There is a risk, however small, that Biden could win the election even though he would not assume office. Some scholars would argue, that despite the vagueness of the Constitution in this matter, the 2024 presidential election would automatically pass to Harris … even though she was not elected as “President”.
Even though partisan political operatives would attempt to make a case that President Harris could simply cancel the election, this is simply not the case, and it would be grossly unconstitutional for a President to attempt to cancel the election. If she did, she would almost certainly be impeached, and the Speaker of the House would step in…congratulations Speaker Johnson.
A more likely scenario is that the Democrat party would instantly jump into action and declare that ALL votes previously cast for Biden are hereby directed to a new nominee. They will make the farcical assertion that the votes cast were for a “party”, not a “person”.
Drawing on historical examples, we can reflect on the 1912 U.S. presidential election, where the sudden death of the Republican Party’s Vice Presidential candidate, James Sherman, prompted rapid adjustments. In a race split between President Taft and former President Theodore Roosevelt, the unexpected vacancy led to the selection of Nicholas Murray Butler as the new Vice-Presidential candidate. The ensuing controversy likely contributed to Woodrow Wilson’s victory.
In another example, the tragic plane crash involving Senator Paul Wellstone occurred on October 25, 2002, just 11 days before the scheduled U.S. Senate election in Minnesota. Senator Wellstone, a Democrat seeking re-election for a third term, was traveling with his wife Sheila, their daughter Marcia, three campaign staffers, and two pilots when their plane went down in freezing weather conditions in northern Minnesota.
The sudden and devastating crash resulted in the loss of Senator Wellstone, his wife, his daughter, and the other passengers on board. The incident sent shockwaves through the state and the nation, as Wellstone was a well-respected and influential figure in Minnesota politics.
With the election only days away and early voting already underway, the Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party (DFL), which is affiliated with the Democratic Party in Minnesota, faced a significant challenge. Minnesota law allowed the major political parties to replace a candidate in the event of death within a certain timeframe before the election.
In response to the tragedy, the DFL swiftly convened to select a replacement candidate. Former Vice President Walter Mondale emerged as the party’s choice to fill the vacancy left by Senator Wellstone. Walter Mondale had a long and distinguished political career, having served as Vice President under President Jimmy Carter and as a U.S. Senator from Minnesota prior to that.
The decision to replace Wellstone with Mondale was not without controversy, as some critics argued that the sudden change in candidate disrupted the electoral process. Nevertheless, the DFL moved forward with Mondale’s candidacy, and his name was placed on the ballot as the new Democratic nominee. He ultimately lost, but the precedent stands.
Another example is the accent of Gerald Ford.
Gerald Ford’s ascension to the presidency was indeed a unique and historic event. Ford became the 38th Vice President of the United States on December 6, 1973, following the resignation of Vice-President Spiro Agnew, who faced legal troubles related to tax evasion and bribery. Ford, a Congressman from Michigan and the House Minority Leader, was appointed by President Richard Nixon as Vice-President, and confirmed by Congress as Agnew’s replacement.
The political landscape took a dramatic turn when President Richard Nixon faced the Watergate scandal, a political crisis involving the cover-up of illegal activities within the Nixon administration. As the scandal intensified and the likelihood of Nixon’s impeachment grew, Gerald Ford found himself thrust into the limelight.
On August 8, 1974, Richard Nixon became the first U.S. president to resign from office. Following Nixon’s resignation, Gerald Ford was sworn in as the 38th President of the United States on August 9, 1974.
Now, let’s take this hypothetical scenario a step further. Imagine that, due to unforeseen circumstances, Joe Biden is unable to follow through with the election. What are the legal maneuvers that the Democrat Party would embark to resolve the situation?
Faced with this unprecedented challenge, the Democratic Party makes a groundbreaking decision. All delegates, traditionally bound by primary and caucus outcomes, are granted the status of superdelegates, able to vote for any candidate they choose.
With amazing and mind-baffling speed, the majority of delegates rally around California Governor Gavin Newsom, instead of sitting President, Kamala Harris. Known for his progressive policies and leadership, Newsom emerges as a consensus candidate who could unite the party and appeal to a broad spectrum of voters…so they believe.
This scenario sets the stage for an unconventional Democratic National Convention, where every delegate, now a superdelegate, wields independent voting rights. The decision to pivot towards Governor Newsom reflects a collective belief that he possesses the qualities necessary to lead the party and the nation during a challenging period.
However there is no legal or constitutional authority that grants a party the ability to transfer a vote cast by a citizen from one person to another. But this won’t stop Democrats from trying and they most assuridily will find a judge to agree with them … in these extraordinary times.
Therefore, Harris would continue as the first Woman President until Newsom is sworn in on January 20, 2025.
But this hypothetical scenario assumes an alternate universe where Donald Trump is not victorious in the 2024 election. The more likely scenario is that the Democrats will use the chaos caused by Biden’s inability to continue with the election to declare that Trump, once again, is an illegitimate President. Thus, causing a whole new era of riots in the streets, impeachments, FBI setups etc. … just like 2016.
Cost per Vote Calculated
TEXAS – After more than $100 million in political warfare, Texans woke up Wednesday morning to a simple reality, the Republican primary for U.S. Senate is not over. In fact, it may have only reached halftime.
Incumbent U.S. Sen. John Cornyn and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton are now headed to a runoff election after neither candidate secured the majority required to win outright in Tuesday’s Republican primary. The contest, widely described as the most expensive Senate primary in American political history, will now stretch another two months before Republican voters decide the nominee.
As of publication, with roughly 94 percent of the vote counted, Cornyn held a narrow lead with 41.9 percent of the vote, totaling 897,187 ballots. Paxton followed closely with 40.7 percent, receiving 871,672 votes. U.S. Rep. Wesley Hunt finished third with 13.5 percent, or 289,403 votes.
Under Texas election law, a candidate must receive more than 50 percent of the vote to win a primary outright. When no candidate crosses that threshold, the top two candidates advance to a runoff election. That runoff is scheduled for May 26.
The results guarantee an extended political showdown between two figures representing sharply different visions of Republican leadership.
Paxton addressed supporters Tuesday night during an election watch event in Dallas hosted by the pro-Paxton Lone Star Liberty PAC. The attorney general framed the outcome as a rejection of the political establishment and a signal from grassroots voters across Texas.
“Together with your support, we just sent a message loud and clear to Washington,” Paxton told the crowd. “Texas is not for sale.”
Paxton also pointed to the massive financial disparity between the campaigns, arguing that despite overwhelming spending by groups aligned with the incumbent senator, Republican voters still rejected the status quo.
“Nearly 60 percent of Texas voters, who have known Cornyn for over 40 years, after hearing $100 million worth of ads, chose to vote against the incumbent,” Paxton said. “That’s historic.”
Cornyn did not host an election night event but briefly addressed reporters Tuesday evening as the vote count continued.
“I’ve worked for decades to build the Republican Party, both here in Texas and nationally,” Cornyn said. “I refuse to allow a flawed, self-centered and shameless candidate like Ken Paxton risk everything we’ve worked so hard to build over these many years.”
Cornyn’s campaign has consistently argued that Paxton represents a risk to the Republican Party’s electoral prospects, while Paxton’s supporters have framed the race as a battle between grassroots conservatives and Washington insiders.
Cornyn campaign spokesman Matt Mackowiak previously told reporters that the campaign would not hold an election night celebration because the team does not “do halftime parties.”
The Cost of Each Vote
The financial dynamics of the race reveal an even more striking contrast between the campaigns.
Based on available spending figures tied to advertising and campaign messaging efforts, Cornyn’s political operation and allied groups spent roughly $70 million supporting his campaign. Paxton’s campaign and aligned efforts spent approximately $4.1 million, while Hunt’s campaign spending totaled about $11.4 million.
When those spending totals are compared with the number of votes received, the results highlight a dramatic difference in campaign efficiency.
- Cornyn’s spending equates to roughly $78.02 per vote, calculated by dividing $70 million by his 897,187 votes.
- Paxton’s campaign achieved nearly the same vote total at dramatically lower cost, spending approximately $4.70 per vote to secure 871,672 votes.
- Hunt’s campaign, which finished third, spent about $39.39 per vote, based on $11.4 million in spending and 289,403 votes.
In practical terms, Paxton’s campaign proved vastly more efficient at converting dollars into voter support, achieving almost the same vote share as Cornyn while spending only a fraction of the money.
Political analysts say the spending gap reflects heavy financial involvement by national Republican organizations and establishment political committees seeking to defend the incumbent senator.
Despite that financial advantage, the spending did not produce the decisive victory many expected.
Instead, it produced a runoff.
What Comes Next
The May 26 runoff now becomes the defining stage of the race. Historically, Texas runoff elections attract significantly lower voter turnout than primary elections, meaning campaigns must rely heavily on organization, messaging, and targeted voter mobilization.
Both candidates are expected to intensify campaigning across the state in the coming weeks, focusing on grassroots engagement, media messaging, and turnout operations.
The runoff will determine which candidate ultimately represents the Republican Party in the general election.
Opinion
One candidate’s role in Tuesday’s outcome should not be overlooked.
Congressman Wesley Hunt finished a distant third, but his presence in the race likely ensured that Paxton would not get the 50% needed to secure the nomination and may have now handed the election over to Cornyn.
It matters because Texas runoff elections tend to favor the campaign with the deeper pockets and stronger political machinery…that’s Cornyn. Cornyn’s access to national Republican fundraising networks and establishment political organizations could translate into a powerful turnout operation. Ground operations, voter targeting, and aggressive get-out-the-vote campaigns often determine the winner when turnout drops.
Paxton, by contrast, will rely heavily on grassroots enthusiasm among voters who see his candidacy as a challenge to what they view as a disconnected Washington political class. Cornyn is deeply hated by the electorate. The only question is, do they hate him enough to come out for a 2nd time to vote against him?
FATE, TX – Fate voters are heading into a May 2 election that could fundamentally rearrange the city’s governing body.
Two City Council seats are open, with no incumbents seeking reelection. At the same time, residents will weigh a recall question targeting sitting Council Member Codi Chinn. If the recall succeeds, the newly seated council, whatever its composition after the election, would appoint someone to fill the resulting vacancy.
Taken together, the ballot presents more than routine municipal housekeeping. It presents a potential structural reset.
Who Is On The Ballot
For Council Member, Place 2, voters will choose between Lorna Grove and Ashley Rains. The seat is currently held by Mark Harper, who opted not to run for another term.
For Council Member, Place 3, Melinda McCarthy faces Allen Robbins, a former Fate councilman. That seat is currently held by Scott Kelley, who also chose not to seek reelection.
In addition, the ballot includes a recall measure concerning Council Member Codi Chinn. Under Texas municipal law, recall elections allow voters to decide whether an elected official should remain in office before the end of a term. If a majority supports removal, the position becomes vacant.
What Happens If The Recall Succeeds
If voters approve the recall, the City Council would be responsible for appointing a replacement to serve out the remainder of the term, unless the city council calls a special election. In Fate’s case, the council has authority to fill a vacancy by appointment.
That means the composition of the council immediately after May 2 will matter significantly. The same body that voters help shape at the ballot box would select the individual who fills the recalled member’s seat.
In practical terms, voters are not only choosing two new council members. They may also be indirectly influencing who could become a third.
Texas Senate Primaries Show Early Leads for Crockett and Paxton
AUSTIN, Texas – A new poll released by The Texas Tribune indicates that Jasmine Crockett and Ken Paxton are leading their respective primary races for the U.S. Senate seat in Texas. The survey, published on February 9, 2026, highlights the early momentum for both candidates as they vie for their party nominations in a closely watched election cycle. The results point to strong voter recognition and support for Crockett in the Democratic primary and Paxton in the Republican primary.
The poll, conducted among likely primary voters across the state, shows Crockett holding a significant lead over her Democratic challenger James Talarico, while Paxton maintains a commanding position among Republican contenders John Cornyn & Wesley Hunt.
According to the poll, Ken Paxton leads with 38 percent of likely GOP primary voters, pulling ahead of incumbent John Cornyn, who trails at 31 percent, while Wesley Hunt remains a distant third at 17 percent. The survey indicates Paxton would hold a commanding advantage in a runoff scenario and currently outperforms Cornyn across nearly every key Republican demographic group, with Latino voters the lone exception, where Cornyn maintains a seven-point edge.
Among Democrats, the poll shows Jasmine Crockett opening a notable lead, capturing 47 percent of likely primary voters compared to 39 percent for James Talarico—a meaningful shift from earlier polling that had Talarico in the lead. While still early, the numbers suggest momentum is consolidating ahead of primaries that will determine the general election matchups.
Jasmine Crockett, a sitting U.S. Representative whose district lines were redrawn out from under her, has responded to political extinction with a desperate lurch toward the U.S. Senate. Her campaign, widely criticized as race-baiting and grievance-driven, has leaned heavily on inflaming urban Democratic turnout while cloaking thin policy substance in fashionable slogans about healthcare and “equity.”
By contrast, Ken Paxton enters the race with a long, battle-tested record as Texas Attorney General, earning fierce loyalty from conservatives for his aggressive defense of state sovereignty, constitutional limits, and successful legal challenges to federal overreach. Though relentlessly targeted by opponents, Paxton’s tenure reflects durability, clarity of purpose, and an unapologetic alignment with the voters he represents—qualities that define his standing in the contest.
The Texas U.S. Senate race draws national attention, as the state remains a critical battleground in determining the balance of power in Congress. With incumbent dynamics and shifting voter demographics at play, the primary outcomes will set the stage for a potentially contentious general election. The Texas Tribune poll serves as an initial benchmark, though voter sentiment could evolve as campaigns intensify and debates unfold in the coming weeks.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login