Connect with us

Published

on

Has Michael Kovacs revealed himself as a Closet Socialist?

Fate, TX – The Fate Charter Commission, appointed at the December 2, 2024, City Council meeting, gathers today to discuss a series of controversial proposals from City Manager Michael Kovacs. These amendments to the city charter aim to centralize power in the city manager’s office, weaken citizen oversight, and shield council members from accountability. The timing and substance of these proposals raise serious questions about Kovacs’ motives as his tenure likely nears its end.

The newly appointed Charter Commission includes Callie Beard, Brandon Clayton, Katura Curry, Karen Kiser, Autumnn Lobinsky, John Stacy, Jon Thatcher, and Councilmen Codi Chinn and Lance Megyesi. Kiser and Lobinsky currently serve on the Planning & Zoning Commission, while Stacy is a sitting Rockwall County Commissioner. Thatcher, the city’s former attorney, has a controversial history, including allegations of misleading the public about the text of city-approved legislation. The Fate Tribune previously reported on these allegations in an exposé about the weaponization of city government.

The Proposals: Consolidating Power and Silencing Dissent

Kovacs’ proposed amendments, cloaked in language about efficiency and cost savings, seek to reshape Fate’s government in ways that would empower him and his allies at the expense of the public.

1. Expense Reimbursement Without Council Oversight

Kovacs proposes amending Section 3.03 (Compensation) to allow the city manager to approve council members’ expense reimbursements without council review. He argues this change would eliminate a procedural formality.

However, this move would remove a key check on public spending. The Fate Tribune has repeatedly reported on council members abusing taxpayer dollars by attending unnecessary junkets disguised as conferences or training. Allowing Kovacs to approve reimbursements unilaterally would obscure accountability and enable wasteful spending by council members.

2. Weakening Council Investigative Powers

In Section 3.05 (Powers and Duties of the City Council), Kovacs recommends removing the council’s authority to investigate city departments, calling it “cumbersome and expensive.”

This proposal would strip the council of a vital tool for holding city staff accountable. Critics argue it’s another step toward consolidating power in the city manager’s office while shielding department heads and staff from public oversight.

3. Curtailing Citizen Initiatives, Referendums, and Recalls

Perhaps the most troubling is Kovacs’ proposed revision of Article 5 (Initiative, Referendum, and Recall). He claims the rise of social media and “special interest groups” poses a risk of misuse by the electorate.

In reality, Kovacs is targeting citizens’ ability to hold their government accountable. His proposal aims to weaken the public’s right to recall corrupt council members or force the council to act on referendums proposed by voters. Kovacs has long shown disdain for residents who use social media to criticize his administration, making this an attempt to stifle dissent and consolidate authority.

4. Eliminating Council Budgetary Control

In Section 6.06 (Contingent Appropriation), Kovacs seeks to eliminate a discretionary budget line item controlled by the council. Though only $2,500 in the current fiscal year, it serves as a modest fund for unforeseen needs.

Kovacs argues this line item is unnecessary given the city’s reserves. However, removing it would further erode the council’s independent financial authority, leaving all budgetary decisions under the city manager’s control.

A Pattern of Strong Towns Ideology

Kovacs has long been a proponent of the “Strong Towns” movement, a central-planning philosophy often at odds with the values of small-town governance. This ideology prioritizes government control and discourages citizen-led initiatives, a theme evident in his proposed charter revisions.

These amendments are not just administrative tweaks—they represent a broader attempt to entrench Strong Towns principles into Fate’s charter, limiting citizen oversight and ensuring government operates on his terms, not the public’s.

A Desperate Power Grab as His Tenure Nears Its End

Kovacs’ motivations are clear. With a new council majority set to take office in May, his tenure as city manager is likely nearing its end. His proposals reflect a desperate attempt to consolidate his power, and protect loyal allies on the current council.

Critics argue these actions betray the public trust. “Kovacs knows his time is up,” said longtime Fate resident J.M. “He’s trying to rewrite the rules to benefit himself and his comrades, while silencing the voices of the people he’s supposed to serve.”

A Controversial Charter Commission

The composition of the Charter Commission itself has sparked concern. Karen Kiser and Autumnn Lobinsky bring experience from the Planning & Zoning Commission, but their alignment with Kovacs’ vision of governance is well known. John Stacy, a Rockwall County Commissioner, adds political weight to the group, but his priorities do not align with residents seeking greater accountability.

Jon Thatcher’s appointment is particularly contentious. As Fate’s former city attorney, he was accused of misleading the public about the text of city-approved legislation, a claim detailed in the Fate Tribune’s report on the weaponization of city government. His role on the commission raises doubts about the impartiality of the process.

The Battle for Fate’s Future

Today’s meeting will determine whether the Charter Commission sides with the people or enables a city manager desperate to cement his authority. Kovacs’ proposals threaten to erode transparency, accountability, and citizen empowerment, leaving Fate governed by an insulated bureaucracy rather than its residents.

The stakes are high. If Kovacs succeeds, Fate’s government will be fundamentally reshaped in ways that prioritize power for a select few over the rights of its citizens. As the meeting unfolds, the public must demand that their voices be heard—and that their government remains accountable to the people it serves.

It is important to note, however, that the Charter Commission’s proposals are merely advisory. Any recommended changes must be approved by the City Council and ultimately ratified by Fate voters before taking effect. This ensures that the residents of Fate retain the final say in shaping their city’s future.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Featured

30 Children Saved in Texas Anti-Trafficking Operation

Published

on

San Antonio, TX – More than 30 missing children were located and recovered during Operation Lightning Bug, a focused law enforcement initiative that stretched from July 28 through August 15. The operation, centered in San Antonio, unveiled not only the scale of child exploitation in the state but also the increasingly urgent role Texas agencies are being forced to play in combating trafficking amid a national border crisis.

The U.S. Marshals Service (USMS), working in concert with the San Antonio Police Department (SAPD) and the Lone Star Fugitive Task Force, spearheaded the mission. In an official release, USMS confirmed that “over 30 missing juveniles” were located, six confirmed trafficking survivors were removed from exploitation, five trafficking investigations were launched, three individuals were arrested for harboring runaways, and nine felony warrants were executed. Additionally, “over 120 missing juveniles [were] encouraged to return home, resulting in cleared entries from state and national databases.”

The safety of our children is the safety of our communities, and justice demands that we protect those who cannot protect themselves,” said U.S. Marshal Susan Pamerleau for the Western District of Texas. “Through Operation Lightning Bug, we reaffirm our promise to safeguard the most vulnerable and strengthen the safety of our communities.

SAPD Chief William McManus echoed the urgency behind the operation, stating, “Every suspect arrested, juvenile returned home, and survivor taken out of harm’s way matters. This operation demonstrates what can be achieved when law enforcement agencies unite to protect children.

A Deliberate Target on Traffickers

Operation Lightning Bug was highly strategic. Teams reviewed every missing juvenile listed in both the Texas Crime Information Center and the National Crime Information Center databases, identifying cases where minors were deemed “at high risk of exploitation by traffickers and predators.” The operation included deputies from USMS offices in San Antonio, Del Rio, Midland, and Pecos, along with specialized SAPD units, including Missing Persons, Special Victims, covert teams, and Street Crimes personnel. Intelligence gathering allowed law enforcement to prioritize the most vulnerable cases and craft operational plans that led to direct recoveries and arrests.

SAPD’s Special Victims Unit interviewed each recovered child to determine whether they had been victimized. Trafficking survivors were immediately connected with Texas Health and Human Services and partner organizations to ensure long-term safety, mental health support, and reintegration assistance.

According to data from the International Center for Missing and Exploited Children, more than 330,000 minors were reported missing in the United States in 2024. While many are found quickly, those who lack stable homes or strong support systems are increasingly being targeted by trafficking rings.

Trafficking Thrives on Instability — and Policy Failure

Kirsta Leeburg Melton, founder and CEO of the Institute to Combat Trafficking, explained to Fox News that “trafficking is the exploitation of men, women and children for forced sex or forced labor by a third party for their profit or gain. That’s been around forever. What hasn’t really been around is people’s understanding of that crime and their knowledge that it’s happening everywhere.

Melton further noted that traffickers prey on minors with “unstable home lives,” including those suffering from a lack of food, housing, family support, or emotional security. Technology serves as a primary tool for both predators and buyers, giving traffickers a near-invisible reach into vulnerable groups.

The unprecedented influx of undocumented minors during the Biden administration placed child welfare and trafficking oversight systems under intense strain—a crisis Texas law enforcement is still working to contain. By contrast, under President Trump’s term, stricter border enforcement and cartel disruption efforts made it significantly harder for trafficking networks to exploit cross-border routes at scale.

Texas Law Enforcement Takes the Lead

While Washington debates border security and trafficking enforcement in committee rooms, Texas law enforcement agencies continue to operate on the front lines. Operation Lightning Bug not only demonstrated the capability of state and federal joint task forces but also reinforced the necessity of cooperation among local agencies.

The Lone Star Fugitive Task Force, involved in the operation, consists of personnel from SAPD, the Bexar County Sheriff’s Office, Texas DPS, the Texas Attorney General’s Office, Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS), New Braunfels Police Department, Texas Board of Criminal Justice OIG, Bexar County District Attorney’s Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and the U.S. Marshals Service.

Under authority granted by the Justice for Victims of Trafficking Act of 2015, the U.S. Marshals Service now has explicit power to intervene in missing child cases regardless of whether a sex offender or fugitive is involved. This expansion allowed USMS to establish the Missing Child Unit, which now collaborates rapidly with nationwide law enforcement partners.

Operation Lightning Bug showed what can happen when that authority is fully exercised. It demonstrated what many Texans already know: when state and local agencies are given the backing, funding, and legal authority to act, children are saved, predators are taken down, and trafficking networks are disrupted—sometimes permanently.

A Crisis That Isn’t Slowing Down

In August, 11 children were reported missing in North Dakota—a state with a population of fewer than one million. Earlier, in June, authorities recovered more than two dozen children in a Florida operation described as a “first-of-its-kind missing child rescue operation.” These numbers indicate a nationwide escalation rather than isolated events.

As Texas continues to serve as a primary trafficking corridor due to its geographic proximity to the border and multiple interstate routes, state officials are increasingly forced to respond where federal leadership has not.

Child trafficking is often framed as a distant, foreign evil—but Operation Lightning Bug makes it clear: the victims live here. They disappear from neighborhoods, schools, shelters, foster systems, and broken homes. They are not statistics; they are Texas children, lost to predators who thrive in moments of policy weakness and exploit institutional gaps.

Texas Fights — Even as the Battle Grows Harder

There is no declared victory here. But there is proof of impact. Thirty children were found. Six survivors of trafficking were brought out of exploitation and into safety. Five new investigations are underway, likely mapping broader criminal networks. Over 120 missing children—some voluntarily gone, some running from abuse—were convinced to return home. Felony suspects are now in custody.

More importantly, the operation forced public attention on a crisis that prefers to operate in the shadows.

Every rescued child represents a life pulled off a path toward trauma, abuse, or death. Every warrant served sends a message that Texas still has teeth in its justice system. And every coordinated effort reminds traffickers that the state is watching.

Operation Lightning Bug is not the end—but it is a bright flash in the dark, signaling that Texas law enforcement is willing to strike, even when others won’t.

Continue Reading

Featured

Texas Braces for “No Kings” Protests on October 18 – Areas to Avoid

Published

on

George Washington sets crown on fire.

As Texas gears up for a wave of nationwide “No Kings” protests scheduled for Saturday, October 18, residents in major cities across the state are advised to steer clear of key downtown and civic areas to avoid potential disruptions, traffic snarls, and heightened security measures. The anti-authoritarian demonstrations, organized under the banner of opposing perceived executive overreach by President Donald Trump, are expected to draw crowds echoing the large turnouts seen in June. While organizers promote peaceful assembly, past events have occasionally spilled into street closures and increased police presence.

The “No Kings” movement, which frames itself as a grassroots push against authoritarianism, has ties to left-wing groups including Indivisible and, according to state officials, Antifa networks previously designated as domestic terrorists by President Trump. Protests are slated in at least eight Texas locales, focusing on central hubs like city halls, parks, and capitol grounds. Here’s a rundown of the hot spots to sidestep:

CityLocation/DetailsTime WindowNotes
HoustonMarch from Houston City Hall; Rally at Discovery Green (1500 McKinney St)Noon–2 p.m. (rally); ~2 p.m. start (march)Downtown core; expect pedestrian crowds and possible road blocks.
Houston (Suburbs)The Woodlands (Lake Woodlands Dr & Six Pines Dr); La Porte City Hall (604 W Fairmont Pkwy)10 a.m.–1 p.m. (The Woodlands); 10 a.m.–Noon (La Porte)Satellite events in suburban civic spots; lighter traffic but monitor local alerts.
San AntonioTravis Park4–6 p.m.Downtown landmark; anticipate street closures and elevated foot traffic.
DallasPacific Plaza (401 N Harwood St)Noon–3 p.m.Central business district; business commuters should plan alternate routes.
AustinMeet at Texas State Capitol, march ~1 mile to Auditorium Shores2 p.m. startTraverses downtown; riverfront park finale could draw lingering crowds.
Fort Worth501 W 7th St11 a.m.–3 p.m.7th Street corridor in downtown; entertainment district vibe with protest overlay.
ArlingtonArlington Sub Courthouse (700 E Abram St)10 a.m.–NoonCivic center area; near courts, potential for quick law enforcement response.
PlanoNE corner of Preston & Parker Rd (near Wells Fargo Bank)10 a.m.–NoonCommercial intersection; suburban but busy with shoppers and drivers.
LaredoJett Bowl North10 a.m.–NoonLocal rec landmark; public gathering spot in a border community.

These sites were compiled from announcements by organizers and local media reports. There will be many more protests in cities of all sizes. Authorities urge the public to check city traffic apps and news updates for real-time detours.


SIDELINE: Abbott Mobilizes Guard and DPS to Safeguard Austin

In a preemptive strike against potential unrest, Governor Greg Abbott has ordered the deployment of the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) and the Texas National Guard to Austin, where the democrat run city is expected to be the hub of the most violent and extreme protesters. The move, announced Friday, targets the capital city’s planned march amid concerns over links to Antifa groups, which President Trump recently labeled a domestic terrorist organization.

Violence and destruction will never be tolerated in Texas,” Abbott stated in a release from his office. The surge includes state troopers, Special Agents, Texas Rangers, aircraft surveillance, and tactical assets, coordinated with the state’s Homeland Security Division to scan for extremist ties. This echoes a similar summer operation around the Capitol during prior demonstrations.

Local law enforcement will collaborate on arrests for any acts of violence or property damage, emphasizing deterrence over confrontation. Austinites near the Capitol or Auditorium Shores should prepare for a visible security footprint.


Behind the scenes, the “No Kings” push has drawn scrutiny for its funding streams, with reports pointing to deep-pocketed backers like George Soros’ Open Society Foundations (nearly $8 million to Indivisible since 2017), the Arabella Advisors network (over $114 million to affiliates from 2019–2023), and billionaire donors such as Hansjörg Wyss and Walmart heiress Christy Walton. While much of this support flows through dark-money channels for broader civic engagement, critics argue it amplifies protest logistics and messaging.

As the sun sets on these gatherings, it’s worth a final nod to the movement’s own rallying cry: There are no kings in America. And Donald Trump doesn’t see himself as one—for if he did, he wouldn’t allow protests like this to occur in the first place. Stay safe, Texas.

Continue Reading

Government

Texas Military Families Feel Immediate Impact of Shutdown as Food Pantry Lines Surge Outside Fort Hood

Published

on

Killeen, Texas – Before dawn Thursday morning, military families began lining up outside the Armed Services YMCA food pantry in Harker Heights, just miles from Fort Hood. By 5 a.m., the line wrapped around the building—an unprecedented sight for the nonprofit that serves thousands of Central Texas military households.

By mid-morning, the pantry’s shelves were empty. “We had a 34% increase this week over past weeks,” said Dorene Ocamb, the Armed Services YMCA’s chief brand and development officer, in comments first reported by Military Times. “We expected an increase, but didn’t quite expect this.

The surge in demand followed the federal government shutdown that began at 12:01 a.m. Wednesday after Congress failed to pass a continuing resolution to keep agencies funded. Troops received their October 1st paychecks, but uncertainty looms over whether the October 15th pay cycle will be disrupted.

Anxiety Hits Home in Central Texas

Fort Hood, one of the largest U.S. Army installations in the world, anchors the economy of Central Texas. When military families face financial disruption, the ripple effects hit Killeen, Harker Heights, and surrounding communities almost immediately.

There’s a lot of anticipatory anxiety around potentially losing a paycheck,” Ocamb told Military Times. Families who rely on steady pay are taking precautions: stretching food budgets, delaying bills, and turning to nonprofits for help.

Normally, the pantry’s food supply lasts until early afternoon. On Thursday, shelves were bare by 10 a.m. Hundreds of families—many with young children—came through in just a few hours. Diapers and wipes, not usually available at the site, were distributed to mothers and expectant mothers as needs spiked.

Political Gridlock in Washington

While Democrats and Republicans traded blame this week, the breakdown came down to one central issue: House Republicans passed a short-term “clean” continuing resolution to keep the government open while negotiations continued, but Senate Democrats rejected it, insisting on adding billions in new spending provisions.

As a result, non-essential government functions were shuttered, and military families are left bracing for missed paychecks.

Republicans from Texas have been outspoken in their criticism. Rep. Roger Williams (R-TX), chairman of the House Small Business Committee, said Democrats are “holding our troops hostage to force more reckless spending.” Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) added that “a clean CR would keep the lights on and keep paychecks flowing. It’s the Democrats’ refusal to compromise that is pushing military families into food pantry lines.

Food and Childcare Relief

The Armed Services YMCA in Killeen, which has two distribution locations, prioritizes junior enlisted families but does not restrict food aid by rank. Families can take up to 25 pounds of shelf-stable items, dairy, frozen protein, and fresh produce, choosing what fits their needs. “Food is one of those basic needs. If you show up and need food, we’re going to serve you,” Ocamb said.

In addition to food, ASYMCA announced it will allow parents to defer childcare payments at its centers until military pay resumes—a critical measure for dual-income military households.

Texas Bears a Larger Burden

With more than 163,000 active-duty service members, Texas has one of the highest concentrations of military families in the nation. What happens here sets the tone for bases nationwide. Similar scenes of food insecurity are playing out across the country—in San Diego, Norfolk, Fort Bragg, and Alaska—as nonprofits scramble to increase the frequency of their distributions.

But in Texas, the impact is magnified. Fort Hood alone is home to tens of thousands of soldiers and dependents. When paychecks stop, the economic shock ripples not just through the base, but through grocery stores, childcare providers, landlords, and small businesses that depend on military customers.

A Message to Military Families

Ocamb’s advice to families was direct: “Go out and seek out food pantry help. It may help alleviate a line item in their budget,” she said. That relief, she noted, can free up cash for rent, mortgages, or car payments.

Families without access to an ASYMCA pantry are encouraged to use FoodFinder.us, which lists food pantries nationwide by ZIP code. Banks, credit unions, and military relief societies are also preparing to assist families if the shutdown drags on.

The Bottom Line

The faces of the shutdown are not lobbyists or politicians in Washington—they are the military families in Central Texas waiting in line for food before sunrise. While Democrats in the Senate refuse to accept a clean resolution that would keep the government funded, those serving in uniform and their children are left bearing the consequences.

  • This article has been revised to reflect the correct name of Fort Hood, formally known as Fort Cavazos.
Continue Reading