Connect with us

Published

on

11/11/2020 – Denton County, TX

In a previous report we outlined how the Denton County Health Services Department has refused to provide oversight of their statistics. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s office agrees. The people simply have no right to verify any health-related information collected by the County.

As a follow up to this story the Trophy Club Journal began to dig deeper and conduct our research in a more circular way. We sent another Open Records Request (ORR) to Nancy West, Administrative Specialist II, Denton County Criminal District Attorney’s Office, Civil Division … this is the office that is responding to our ORR submittals.

Our request stated,

“Good morning Mrs. West,

We have observed that the Denton County COVID website now contains the data at the City level that we previously requested and which you made claim was not compiled. I am pleased that you have changed your mind, decided to compile the information, and present it to the public.

In light of Ken Paxton’s recent ruling that you are not required to provide data that contains private health information, I am submitting this new request for open records.

1. Please provide me a copy of the policy that directs you where and to whom you are to provide the COVID information that you collect.

2. If not contained within the same document as above, please provide the policy that outlines what type of information you are to include in that distribution.

Sincerely, Michael E. Pipkins, Executive Editor, Trophy Club Journal”

We feel this is a pretty straight forward request. One that is easily obtainable and doesn’t violate any sort of HIPPA law. To summarize, all we want is the policy that tells them what type of information to collect and whom they are required to send the data once they collect it. Easy right?

Apparently not.

The first response from Nancy is simply a boilerplate response to obfuscate their desire not to answer the request. She stated,

“Pursuant to your below request, Denton County Public Health follows the laws set forth in Texas Government Code, Health and Safety Code chapter 81 and HIPAA provisions where the code is silent.  Having said that, the type of information released is outlined in the aforementioned laws.  This concludes your request.”

Clearly, the Denton County Health Services District is doing everything they can to avoid complying with Texas open records laws.

So we respond to Mrs. West. (Admittedly, our patience is running thin due to this obvious obstruction.”

“Mrs. West,

Your response is unacceptable. I have asked you to provide your written policies on the matter regarding whom you are required by law to share the information, not for private information of any individual. I demand that you seek an interpretation from Ken Paxton’s office.”

So here’s where it gets, interesting.

We receive a response to this last correspondence from Tony Paul, Assistant District Attorney, Denton County Criminal District Attorney’s Office, Civil Division. His response is perhaps even more shocking.

“Mr. Pipkins, Denton County Public Health does not have written policies.  Therefore, we will not be seeking AG Opinion as there is no information to provide to the AG’s office to review and provide an opinion thereof.  Having said that, your request is concluded.  Sincerely, Tony Paul”

Allow me to highlight that again just in case you are completely baffled by what Tony Paul just wrote … “Denton County Public Health does not have written policies.”

Denton County Public Health does not have written policies.

From here, we are not exactly sure where to go with this. What are we to make of it? Are we to accept that Mr. Paul thinks the people are so stupid to accept his word that the health department operates without a single written policy? Even if he misspoke and intended to apply his statement soly to policies related to COVID … how could this possibly be true?

Perhaps even worse, what if it ACTUALLY IS TRUE?

Staggering are the implications either way. Is the Denton County Health Services District a rogue agency with absolutely no oversight by anyone? Is it even remotely possible that such a large agency can operate without written policies?

Our last email to Mr. Paul, of which we are currently awaiting a response at the time of this publication, is as follows.

“Mr. Paul,

No disrespect but this makes absolutely no sense. You can’t run a Health Department without written policies. Someone somewhere has told you what information to collect and where to send it once you have collected it.

Do you report data to the CDC? Do you report data to the State of Texas? What federal agencies do you send COVID data? Are you involved with contact tracing? If so, who do you send the data so that they can do their job?

Can you understand why the people of Texas are so upset? They want to know the truth about COVID and their health and these are the responses you provide.

Sincerely, Michael E. Pipkins, Executive Editor”

At this point we are not sure if we will ever be able to get a straight answer, or if they will ever provide any records as mandated by law. Unfortunately, at the Trophy Club Journal we don’t have the resources to fight these responses in court. Perhaps they know that.

So, we are reaching out to you, our readers, for assistance. We need you to spread the word far and wide that there is something fishy with the reporting of statistics. Why is the government so determined NOT to allow any oversight or examination of the data? They will not tell us what information they are collecting nor will they tell us whom they are sending the information they collect. They won’t even tell us who is calling the shots.

To look deeper and investigate further, some group will have to stand up and volunteer to represent the People in court. So, we ask you to help us find that group. If you want the truth, as we do, please help us.

Michael Pipkins focuses on public integrity, governance, constitutional issues, and political developments affecting Texans. His investigative reporting covers public-record disputes, city-government controversies, campaign finance matters, and the use of public authority. Pipkins is a member of the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ). As an SPJ member, Pipkins adheres to established principles of ethical reporting, including accuracy, fairness, source protection, and independent journalism.

Austin

Texas GOP Wants Closed Primaries. New Secretary of State Robert Howden Is Preparing to Fight Them.

Published

on

Robert Howden Says No

Austin, TX – Texas Republicans spent years demanding control of their own primary. Now they have a new Secretary of State, Robert S. Howden, appointed by Republican Governor Greg Abbott, and the man taking over the state’s election machinery is inheriting a lawsuit in which his office is expected to defend the very open primary system the GOP wants to dismantle.

The Republican Party of Texas filed the federal lawsuit in September 2025, arguing that Texas’ open primary system violates the party’s First Amendment right of association. Under the current system, Texas voters do not register by party and may choose which party’s primary to vote in during an election cycle. The GOP wants only registered Republicans participating in Republican primaries.

The case is pending in federal court in Amarillo before U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk.

And Robert S. Howden has now inherited it.

Howden Steps Into the Fight

Gov. Abbott appointed Howden as Texas’ 116th secretary of state on July 17, effective July 18. Howden previously served as Abbott’s senior adviser and director of legislative affairs and has worked in the administrations of four Republican governors. As secretary of state, he is Texas’ chief elections officer.

Abbott has been quite clear about where he stands.

At the 2026 Republican Party convention, he said Texas would eventually make clear that “only Republicans vote in Republican primaries.” Abbott has also said lawmakers “can and should be more responsive to Republicans than a judge may be,” indicating that he expects the Legislature to address the issue during the 2027 session.

But that doesn’t mean the Secretary of State’s office is supposed to simply surrender in court.

That was the position taken by Howden’s predecessor, Jane Nelson.

Nelson argued that changing Texas’ primary system was a job for the Legislature, not a federal judge. In an October 2025 statement, she said it was her responsibility to defend existing election laws and that she would implement whatever changes the Legislature lawfully enacted.

The Attorney General’s office took the opposite position.

Attorney General Ken Paxton sided with the Texas GOP, asking the federal court to strike down portions of the Texas Election Code governing open primaries. According to reporting by The Texas Tribune, Nelson’s lawyers said Paxton’s office gave them less than an hour’s notice before taking the opposing position.

So the Republican Party sued the Republican-controlled state government. The Republican Attorney General joined the plaintiffs. And the Republican Secretary of State fought the lawsuit.

That’s not exactly the tidy party unity politicians like to advertise.

The Real Fight Is Over Who Controls the Nomination

The GOP argues that crossover voting allows Democrats and independents to influence Republican nominations, potentially helping candidates who are less conservative than the party base.

The lawsuit specifically pointed to the 2024 Republican primaries involving former House Speaker Dade Phelan and Rep. Gary VanDeaver. Both won their races by fewer than 800 votes, and the party argued that crossover voters helped determine the outcomes.

The party has already made closing primaries an official priority. Republicans adopted rules supporting closed primaries in 2024 and renewed that push at their 2026 convention.

But changing the system is not as simple as flipping a switch.

Texas has more than 18 million registered voters, and the state’s registration system was never designed around party registration. Moving to closed primaries could require new registration procedures, computer-system changes and a method for existing voters to establish party affiliation.

The GOP wants the courts to clear the way, preferably in time for 2028.

Continue Reading

Business

San Angelo’s Data Center Fight Is Now a Recall Fight

Published

on

Data Center Divas

San Angelo, TX – San Angelo’s battle over massive data centers has moved from City Hall chambers to the ballot box, and two council members could soon have to defend their seats before voters angry about how the city has handled the projects. What began as a fight over water, power, development and transparency is now a full-blown political revolt, with recall efforts targeting Council Members Harry Thomas and Joe Self.

And the controversy comes at an interesting moment for Texas. Gov. Greg Abbott has ordered state regulators to conduct a comprehensive audit of data centers moving through the state’s electric grid interconnection process, saying the review must be completed before any data center project moves forward. ERCOT subsequently told Fox News Digital that Abbott’s directive “effectively pauses all data center projects” while the state reviews their demands on the grid.

That means the questions being shouted at San Angelo City Hall are no longer merely local complaints from residents opposed to a particular development. Texas officials are now asking some of the same questions.

Abbott directed the Public Utility Commission of Texas and ERCOT to examine pending data center projects and gather information, including projected annual and peak electricity demand, water consumption, water sources, and whether facilities intend to generate some of their own electricity. ERCOT reported that roughly 90 percent of the 474 gigawatts of large-load interconnection requests currently under review are associated with data centers, more than five times Texas’ record peak electricity demand.

Back in San Angelo, the San Angelo Data Center Citizen Coalition has been pushing its own accountability campaign.

A petition seeking the recall of Council Member Harry Thomas, who represents Single Member District 3, was submitted July 15 with more than the required signatures. The city clerk later certified the petition after determining 53 signatures were sufficient, clearing the way for a recall election.

Following public comment, the City Council voted 6-1 to call the recall election.

Thomas has maintained that he has no intention of resigning.

I weigh every decision I’ve ever made on behalf of the 100,000 citizens in San Angelo,” Thomas said after the petition was submitted. “Every time I vote, I vote for all the citizens. I have no plans to resign from my position.

Self is now facing his own recall effort.

The coalition submitted an affidavit seeking Self’s recall and subsequently collected the signatures necessary to move forward. On Aug. 6, Self issued a statement saying he supports residents’ right to seek a recall but rejected what he described as misinformation about his involvement with data centers.

I have not signed any non-disclosure agreements,” Self said. “I have not benefited financially. I have not voted in favor of a data center.

Self said the council has instead voted on regulations that would apply if a data center is established in San Angelo.

That distinction between approving a specific project and approving regulations governing potential projects has become one of the central arguments in the political fight. San Angelo officials have considered rules addressing land use, water and wastewater issues as the city confronts proposals for large-scale data center development.

The proposed Skybox project has become particularly contentious. City officials have described it as a potential $7.2 billion investment, while opponents have raised concerns about water consumption, electricity demand, infrastructure, noise and transparency surrounding the development process.

The political consequences are spreading beyond San Angelo.

Residents in Temple and Granbury have also launched recall or charter efforts amid disputes over data center development. In Temple, opponents have cited concerns about land, water consumption and heat generated by facilities. In Granbury, activists gathered signatures seeking recalls involving the mayor and most members of the City Council.

Continue Reading

Election

Texas Senate Hopeful James Talarico Shared Pride Event Stage With 11-Year-Old Child Drag Performer

Published

on

Talarico Story Time with Trans Kid

Federal Court Upholds State Limits on Minors at Adult Drag Shows

Taylor, TX – A federal appeals court has just upheld a Florida law restricting minors from attending certain adult live performances, including some drag shows. Within hours of that ruling, renewed attention was focused on Texas Democratic U.S. Senate candidate James Talarico after reports resurfaced showing he headlined a 2021 Pride fundraiser featuring an 11-year-old child drag performer promoted as one of the event’s main attractions.

On Tuesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit ruled in HM Florida-ORL, LLC v. Secretary of the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, allowing Florida to enforce its law restricting minors from attending certain adult live performances. Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier announced the decision, calling it a victory for protecting children. The ruling does not prohibit drag performances for adults, but it recognizes that states may impose limits when minors are involved.

The timing has drawn renewed scrutiny to Talarico’s record as he campaigns for the U.S. Senate against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.

According to promotional materials first highlighted by the Washington Free Beacon, Talarico was a featured speaker during Taylor PRIDE’s June 26, 2021 fundraiser in Taylor, Texas. The event was organized to raise money for “rural LGBTQ communities” and included live music, Drag Story Hour, adult drag performers, and an 11-year-old performer using the stage name “Kween Kee Kee.”

Taylor PRIDE advertised the child as “the absolute cutest & youngest of our drag performers.” Promotional posts stated the child would perform a drag routine and host “Kee Kee Storytime,” where children would participate in Pride-themed craft activities. The event was held at Texas Beer Company.

Photographs published from the event show Talarico addressing attendees from the stage and posing with participants. Additional photographs and video posted publicly show Kween Kee Kee, a local preteen named Keegan, performing in a shimmering blue dress, platinum blonde wig, and theatrical makeup during what organizers described as a Youth Drag Show. One attendee shared video of the child performing the splits before the audience.

The fundraiser also featured several adult drag performers, including Brianna Brinxx, Belladonna Dior, Felecia Enspire, and a performer using the stage name Sedonya Face.

Following criticism from conservative activists who protested the event, Taylor PRIDE defended the festival on social media. The organization rejected claims that the event was sexually explicit or exploitative and encouraged the public to review photographs from the event and decide for themselves.

Talarico’s campaign did not respond to requests for comment from the Washington Free Beacon regarding his participation.

The resurfaced event adds to a broader record that Republicans have highlighted throughout Talarico’s political career. While serving in the Texas House, Talarico opposed legislation restricting drag performances in the presence of children and argued lawmakers should avoid harming what he described as Texas’ drag performers. He has also opposed Republican-backed legislation restricting certain transgender medical treatments for minors and has frequently spoken in support of LGBTQ causes.

More recently, however, Talarico has attempted to present himself as a more moderate statewide candidate. He has described previous remarks, including referring to God as “nonbinary,” as “cringey” and has removed some progressive messaging from campaign materials as he seeks to broaden his appeal beyond Democratic primary voters.

The renewed attention comes as cultural debates surrounding children and drag performances continue playing out both politically and legally. Florida’s appellate court victory represents one of the most significant recent rulings supporting a state’s authority to restrict minors from attending certain adult-oriented live performances, even as litigation over similar laws continues elsewhere.

Continue Reading