40 U.S. Government Lies, Coverups & Abuses
The United States Government is no stranger to Lies, Coverups & Abuses. Here is a list of just 40 well-known examples.
We love our country, but we hate our government…and for good reason. The government of the United States is one of the most lying and corrupt governments on earth. We take comfort in a false belief that the things our government does is for our protection. After all, that’s why the government exists. But the truth is that there is no technology that our government possesses, that it will not eventually use on its own people.
Below is a summary, in no particular order, of 40 times our government has lied or covered up it’s own abuses against citizens or humanity … and that’s not even including the obvious one of the invention of nuclear weapons.
1. CIA Mind Control Program – MKULTRA – The CIA illegally administered drugs such as LSD to thousands of people without their knowledge and often ran experiments on them. Many people died and their families would never know how/why. The agency destroyed all files in 1973 so we will never know the full extent of the program or who was involved. Nobody was ever prosecuted or fired for the illegal destruction of files.
2. My Lai Massacre – American soldiers from the 1st Battalion, 20th Infantry; 4th Battalion, 3rd Infantry; massacred as many as 500 Vietnamese civilians on March 16, 1968. Before murdering them, some women as young as 12 were gang raped. The government covered it up until they were busted by journalists in late 1969. Only 26 soldiers were charged … but only one was convicted on 22 counts. That man, Lieutenant William Calley Jr., a platoon leader, served 3 1/2 years under house arrest. His sentence was commuted by President Richard Nixon.
3. Republican President Eisenhower authorized the CIA plot to kill Cuban citizens (communists) and Fidel Castro, as well as foment a rebellion in a program called Operation Mongoose in 1960.
4. In the 1920’s during prohibition, the Government forced companies that manufacture alcohol used for cleaners & solvents to include poison in the mixtures to stop people from distilling it for drinking. Over 10,000 people died as a result.
5. Area 51 Environmental Catastrophe. It’s not just about aliens. The U.S. Government denied the existence of the military base, known as Area 51 near Groom Lake in Nevada, from 1955 until 2013. The government would burn toxic materials on the base leading to dozens of military personnel with health problems, including cancer. But because the base didn’t officially exist, the service members had no recourse. The government just let them die without taking any responsibility. In 1993, Democrat President Bill Clinton signed an executive order that exempts Area 51 from all environmental laws, furthering the injustice that future service members will face.
6. Under the direction of Attorney General Janet Reno, the FBI murdered 80 people; men, women & children, in an attack on a church compound in Waco, TX in 1993. With little to no evidence of a minor weapons charge, the FBI led a misinformation campaign against a church leader, David Koresh, in order to gain public support for a raid on the compound. They burned the people alive inside the building.
7. The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. From 1930’s to the 1970’s, the U.S. Public Health Service conducted experiments on unwitting poor, black citizens in order to study the effects and progression of untreated syphilis. The government lied to them and promised them free medical care but instead gave them syphilis in order to monitor the effects.
8. Cigarettes are good for you. All the way into the 1960’s, tobacco companies bought and paid for politicians who created policies to encourage smoking, even lying to the Public by getting doctors to endorse the products as an aid to increase lung capacity. This all occurred while it was already known of the dangers. While we blame the tobacco companies, the Government was just as much involved in the deception.
9. CIA torture. Following 9/11, the CIA engaged in “enhanced interrogation” (ie: Torture) with suspected “terrorists”. They manipulated the definition of “terrorists” to include any person who might have the information needed to conduct an investigation into a terrorist plot. The details of the CIA operation were withheld from President Bush for 4 years.
10. DARPA hacks the weather for war. In 1993, the government built a facility in Gakona, Alaska known as HAARP (High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) in order to heat the ionosphere and manipulate the weather to enhance military objectives of war. Many now believe that it may be partly responsible for global warming and is used to feed the narrative for green initiatives.
11. In 1955, The FBI stalked Martin Luther King Jr. because of his involvement with the Montgomery bus boycott. They accused him of being a communist without any evidence. They assigned undercover operatives to infiltrate his inner circle and try to convince him to kill himself. King was just the highest-ranking member of the government’s widespread illegal tracking of “black activists”.
12. The Pentagon Papers. The DOD commissioned a study of the Vietnam War and the United States’ involvement from 1945 to 1967. It detailed how the government manipulated the public through the media into supporting the Vietnam War and how it lied not only to the public but to Congress. When journalist Daniel Ellsberg published the story, he was rewarded with criminal charges of conspiracy, espionage, and theft of government property.
13. “The Nayirah Lie” of George HW Bush. Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait in 1990 and Bush Sr. was looking for a way to justify a war. Kuwait is a non-NATO ally that we had no duty to defend or protect … unless we wanted to keep our greedy hands on their oil. Bush Sr. trotted out a 15-year-old girl named “Nayirah” who spun a horrific tale of Iraqi soldiers bursting into a hospital in Kuwait and removing babies from their incubators, to leave them dying on the floor. But it was all a lie. Nayirah was the daughter of Kuwait’s ambassador to the U.S. and was coached into a false story to gain sympathy for Bush’s war. In the end, it was Bush Sr. that killed babies when the U.S. bombing knocked out power to hospitals and those babies who were on ventilation died.
14. Weapons of Mass Destruction. Following 9/11, the government needed a scapegoat. Even though Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with 9/11, they perpetuated a lie that he had weapons of mass destruction and was likely to use them against U.S. Allies. This gave President George Bush Jr. the excuse needed to invade Iraq. Aside from a few, inoperative gas projectiles, no “mass destruction” devices were ever found…. Bush made up the whole thing to justify an invasion.
15. Roswell Aliens, Not Aliens. In 1947, a crash of an alien spacecraft allegedly occurred in Roswell, NM. The Roswell Army Air Field reported in a press release that they recovered a “flying disk”. Within hours the story was recanted and the government proclaimed it was only a weather balloon. In 1994, the military admitted that they deliberately lied to the public and that the “weather balloon” was actually a top-secret military surveillance balloon code-named, Project Mogul. Once a liar, always a liar. There is no reason to trust anything they tell the public about this.
16. The USS Scorpion. In 1968 the U.S. Navy submarine USS Scorpion went missing in the Atlantic. The government lied to the public that the ship was lost due to an unexplained failure. 99 crewmen died. In 2010 it was revealed that the ship was likely destroyed by a Soviet submarine and that the government had known this since July of 1968 when the wreckage was found.
17. Agent Orange, Vietnam. More lies about Vietnam. The government used a chemical agent “herbicide” to deforest areas of Vietnam between 1962 & 1971. They dropped more than 19 million gallons, covering not only forests but people and animals. The government denied the cancerous effects of the material until 1983, when a settlement was reached. For their service and sacrifice, veterans were given approximately $3800 each.
18. Freedom of the press. The Nixon administration illegally wiretapped journalists put them on enemies lists and audited their tax returns. They censored news stations by threatening to revoke their broadcasting licenses. Seems oddly familiar with events today.
19. Democrat President Woodrow Wilson signed the “espionage act” which he used to imprison journalists and shut down newspapers that disagreed with his policies. It worked so well in stifling speech that the government continues to use that act to this day. Seems oddly familiar with events today.
20. Watergate. Young people may not be familiar with President Richard Nixon and “Watergate”. In 1972, Nixon authorized the break-in of the Democratic National Committee headquarters at the Washington, D.C., Watergate Office Building to steal documents and tap phone lines. Witnesses testified against Nixon in Senate hearings. Ultimately, the coverup was worse than the crime and Nixon was forced to resign from office.
21. Obamacare. In an effort to push a socialist-style, single-payer health care system down the throat of the American people, President Barak (Barry) Hussein Obama (Soetoro) lied to the American people over and over about how they would be able to keep their doctor. Except, most wouldn’t be able to and Obama knew it at the time. You can’t keep a doctor that is either out of business or is not part of the “approved” system.
22. Nord Stream 2. Pulitzer prize journalist Seymour Hersh reveals that Joe Biden ordered the destruction of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline under the Baltic Sea in September 2022. Biden all as much admitted his intent to do so if Russia invaded Ukraine … which they did, just 4 months later. Backing up Biden, Pentagon spokesman Marine Corps Lt. Col. Garron J. Garn told The Post “The United States was not involved in the Nord Stream explosion.” The report from Hersh reveals that they ALL lied to the American public because blowing up a vital supply line to a NATO ally could break up the coalition… not to mention it would open up U.S. targets to Russia as justifiable retaliation … causing WWIII.
23. PRISM. Edward Snowden, a CIA data analyst blew the whistle to reveal that the NSA had a secret program called PRISM, which is used to spy on U.S. Citizens’ email, internet activity, phone calls, and more. For his trouble, he has been living in exile in Russia while not one person in our government has been held accountable for their illegal & unconstitutional activity. Nobody, not even President Trump, has put a stop to this policy. The program marches on to this very day with the government spying on Americans for no legitimate reason.
24. The assassination of President John F. Kennedy. Nobody of sound mind believes that Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK in Dallas on Nov. 22, 1963 … or at least nobody believes that he did it alone. Witnesses testified to hearing shots from multiple locations. A “magic bullet” theory had to be concocted to explain the multiple wounds from the limited number of shots fired by Oswald’s location. Classified documents were supposed to be released in 1992 but every President since that time has extended the deadline. The last President to extend the deadline was Joe Biden who pushed it one last time to December 15, 2022 … Following that deadline, the national archives released 13,000 worthless documents. Keeping the juicy, top-secret stuff that reveals the truth, hidden from the public…probably forever.
25. Monica Lewinsky was hired as an intern for President Bill Clinton. Clinton took advantage of her naivete and engaged in oral sex (at least) with her in the oval office. He lied to the American People, as well as his wife, about the affair and was impeached. His famous line, “I did not have sex with that woman, Mrs. Lewinsky” rings in infamy and taught us how politicians can twist language… ie: “sex” is only “intercourse” and not “oral” … if that is what you believe when you give sworn testimony.
26. The “Iran-Contra Affair” was a secret U.S. arms deal that traded U.S. missiles and other arms to free some Americans held hostage by terrorists in Lebanon but also used funds from the arms deal to support armed conflict in Nicaragua. The scandal might have brought down President Ronald Reagan if not for the loyalty of Oliver North … who took the brunt of the scandal on behalf of the President.
27. The “Fast and Furious” gun-running scandal was headed by Attorney General Eric Holder, under the direction of President Obama in 2009. Fast and Furious was a Justice Department program that allowed government-owned assault weapons to be sold to Mexican drug cartels, allegedly as a way to track them. But internal documents later revealed the real goal was to gin up a crisis requiring a crackdown on guns in America. Fast and Furious was merely a pretext for imposing stricter gun laws.
28. The Man-Made Global Warming Lie. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has been busted in tampering with temperature statistics by lowering previously measured temperatures to show cooler weather in the past and raising more recent temperatures to show warming in the recent present. This “green agenda” is a trillion-dollar gravy train that nobody wants to stop. But it’s not just about money, it’s also about control … control over your life. Because you can’t be trusted with making decisions for yourself.
29. The nuclear agreement with Iran by President Barak (Barry) Hussein Obama (Soetoro) sold to Congress & the American public permits Iran to possess nuclear weapons in about ten years (ie: 2026). The justification was that Capitalism had made the new Iranian government more moderate and proposed that the Iranians deserve to have Nuclear power (whilst it is being blacklisted in our own country). Ben Rhodes, a National Security Adviser in the Obama administration, bragged about the lies and stated that the intelligence community knew it was a lie all along.
30. 3 weeks to flatten the curve. “Flattening the curve” was a public health strategy to slow down the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. The People were told that if we would all just mask up and stay home for 3 weeks, we would stamp out the virus… or at least enable our medical centers to keep up. It was all a lie to calm people with the bonus of taking away civil liberties. The lockdowns would last for 2-3 years, crushed many middle-class families, and shuttered tens of thousands of small businesses…while big business chains were barely affected.
31. “Operation warp speed” was a partnership between the Government and pharmaceutical companies to accelerate the development of a COVID-19 vaccine by January 2021. To accomplish this, President Donald Trump allowed himself to be duped by the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Anthony Fauci, into believing that tens of millions of people would die from the virus unless he (Trump) allows people to be injected with an experimental biological agent.
The began a campaign to deceive the public by redefining a “vaccine” to include the experimental biological agent. Not only did the “vaccine” not stop the spread, but it didn’t prevent infection either. In fact, it has massive side effects, including death… which the government refused to let people know about and continues to cover up to this day. Hundreds of thousands of people have died from the “vaccine” already and yet mandates for its continued use continue in some places.
32. The Russian Collusion Hoax. The Democrat National Committee (DNC) conspired, with funding from Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to slander and frame President Donald Trump with a conspiracy to steal the 2016 election with the help of the Russians. Many outlandish claims were made which have all been revealed to be false. Yet the media, in actual collusion with the DNC and the Biden administration, refuse to cover or investigate the truth.
33. Don’t get droned. “Anwar al-Awlaki” was targeted for assassination by the CIA for his suspected involvement in Al-Qaeda. He was considered “too dangerous” due to his lecturing and publications as an American-Yemeni imam (religious leader) and some people even referred to him as the “Bin Laden of the Internet.” On September 30, 2011, President Obama ordered his assassination and the CIA fired multiple missiles at his vehicle in Yemen, killing him and everybody else in the vehicle. While it is probably likely that Anwar al-Awlaki was indeed a terrorist, he was also an American citizen who was deprived of his right to due process and a trial by jury. He could have been captured, as many terrorists were, but instead, he was intentionally murdered by a President of the United States in order to send a message.
34. Ruby Ridge. In 1992 Randy Weaver was a doomsday prepper and a self-professed white separatist. He fled to his Ruby Ridge, Idaho home after failing to appear in court on ATF charges he received when he sold two sawed-off shotguns to an ATF agent. When U.S. Marshals and the FBI confronted his family outside his property on August 21, 1992 a brief gun battle ensued. Marshals shot Weaver’s dog, then shot Weaver’s 14-year-old son in the back as he ran away, killing him. Weaver’s friend, Kevin Harris then shot and killed a federal marshal. A standoff ensued and the next day an FBI sniper killed Weaver’s unarmed wife while she was holding her 10-month-old daughter. Weaver was wounded as well as a friend. Weaver surrendered two weeks later.
The jury acquitted Weaver of all charges except two, one of which the judge set aside. He was found guilty of one count, failure to appear, for which he was fined $10,000 and sentenced to 18 months in prison. He was credited with time served plus an additional three months, and he was then released. Kevin Harris was acquitted of all criminal charges.
In August 1995, the US government avoided trial on a civil lawsuit filed by the Weavers by awarding the three surviving daughters $1,000,000 each, and Randy Weaver $100,000 over the deaths of Sammy and Vicki Weaver.
No FBI agent or Marshal was ever held accountable for the murders of Weaver’s wife, son or dog.
35. “Project Serpo” was an alleged top-secret alien exchange program between the United States government and an alien planet called, “Serpo” which is located in the Zeta Reticuli star system.
In reality, Project Serpo was a disinformation campaign by United States Air Force Sergeant Richard C. Doty at the direction of the D.O.J. Office of Special Investigations (O.S.I.). The purpose of the campaign was to infiltrate the UFO circuit and slowly feed an ever-increasing absurd story in order to discredit discussions about alien civilizations and visitation. The real questions are, “Why did the government lie?” and “Why did the government feel the need to lie?” … to the American people about this issue.
36. “Stuxnet” was the world’s most sophisticated, mutating, computer virus ever created, sometime between 2005-2010. Developed by the NSA & Mossad (Israel Intelligence) under a program called “Operation Olympic Games”, this self-replicating virus was designed to infect a specific component in Iran’s uranium enrichment facility to cause them to self-destruct. But to get the virus into the air-gapped computer system, they literally and intentionally infected hundreds of millions of computers all over the world, probably even your own home computer, knowing that eventually it would affect a single USB flash drive and be inserted into the Iranians centrifuge system.
It cannot be understated … these governments were literally willing to infect the entire world to ensure that the virus would get into a single USB drive. And now this technology is being used by every nation-state in the world to attack the infrastructure of every other nation.
37. “Operation Northwoods” in 1962 was a false flag operation proposed by the U.S. Military to shoot down American planes and to bomb U.S. bases & cities (ie: Kill Americans) to create the illusion that the United States was under attack by Cuba and thus create a reason for a U.S. invasion. Fortunately, President Kennedy rejected the plan … of course, things didn’t work out too well for him.
38. On January 16, 1893, armed naval forces of the United States led a coup d’état to oust Queen Lili’uokalani of Hawaii. The queen surrendered under protest in order to avoid bloodshed. In 1898 the island territory was officially annexed as a U.S. Territory. Hawaii finally became the 50th State in 1959. The United States officially apologized to native Hawaiians in 1993…but offered no reparations.
39. Entrapment. FBI manipulates, entraps, and then arrests 4 individuals in a plot to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer in October 2020. Two of the four were acquitted and the other two defendants ended up in a mistrial. Court records show that the FBI targeted the “militia group” (ie: an organized group of citizens upset with the Governor’s actions regarding COVID). The FBI infiltrated the group with no less than 4 federal agents who manipulated and radicalized the group into planning to kidnap the Governor. The group never actualized the plan. When it became clear that they were not going to follow through, the FBI arrested them on “conspiracy” instead.
40. A “Family Planning Program” was implemented in the 1970s in some African countries by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) to curb the “problem” of African birth rates. Under the guise of “vaccines”, people were given high doses of Depo-Provera without their knowledge in order to cause permanent infertility. Bill Gates, the founder of Microsoft, funded the operation through the “Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation”.
These are just 40 of the most well-known lies & abuses that the United States Government has perpetrated upon the American People and the world. Our founding fathers did the best job they could in the creation of our governmental system, but they can only go so far. Mankind has a natural proclivity to corruption and susceptibility to evil. We must never lose sight of that and never get so lost in our own patriotism that we shut our eyes to our own government’s abuses.
RED OAK, Texas — It was standing room only, overflow rooms packed, and tempers running high. Yet after hours of objections from residents, a divided Red Oak City Council voted around midnight to approve a massive data center project, leaving many citizens convinced their elected officials had already made up their minds long before the first speaker approached the podium.
The May 11 meeting drew such a crowd that even reporters struggled to get inside. According to Fox 4 News, the council chamber seats 136 people, and at least 70 additional residents had to wait outside or gather in a separate room because of capacity limits. The issue before the council was a proposal to rezone more than 800 acres of farmland for what would become another large data center development. Residents packed the meeting to oppose it. By multiple accounts, no organized speakers appeared in support of the project.
According to Fox 4, city leaders allotted one hour for supporters and one hour for opponents to speak. Residents later complained that the process appeared tilted against citizens because there were virtually no supporters present, while opponents continued lining up to address the council.
The proposal ultimately involved rezoning approximately 830 acres and included a tax abatement package approved by a 4 to 1 vote. Fox 4 reported the council entered executive session for nearly an hour before returning shortly before midnight to cast the decisive vote. Residents who remained said they were willing to stay until 2 a.m. if necessary.
Mayor Mark Stanfill and council members Willie Franklin Jr., Ricardo Miller, and Tim Lightfoot formed the majority approving the measure. Councilman Jeffrey Smith cast the lone dissenting vote. Critics say the four officials effectively ignored overwhelming public opposition and pressed ahead anyway.
Residents repeatedly raised concerns about noise, electrical demand, water consumption, and the location of the facility near schools. City officials argued the project would not use city water for cooling and emphasized the economic benefits and tax revenue expected from the development.
Those assurances did little to calm residents.
“How many of these data centers are next to your house, Mr. Mayor? How many are on the east side of town?” resident Martel Edwards asked during the meeting.
Kim Sterman expressed concern about children attending nearby schools.
“We don’t know what’s going to happen to the children who are going to be going to schools,” Sterman said. “All of our schools over there, the high school and the junior high are going to be pretty close to this new patent board facility. Y’all don’t know what’s going to happen.“
Residents also complained that city officials threatened individuals displaying anti-data center signs on their property, allegations reported separately by local media and discussed by residents during and after the controversy. Those claims could not be independently verified by Pipkins Reports.
The battle in Red Oak reflects a growing national trend. Data centers are essential to modern computing and artificial intelligence systems. But communities across Texas and the country have increasingly questioned the rapid expansion of these facilities.
Critics point to concerns over electricity demand, environmental impacts, noise, and the industrialization of previously rural land. Some studies and utility reports have warned that rising AI related power consumption could place additional stress on electric grids and contribute to higher costs for consumers.
Residents expressed frustration that another major project was being approved despite widespread opposition. Some expressed that the process to replace the Mayor and other City Council members, began last night and that the action they have taken regarding the Data Center has sealed their fate.
Sources: Red Oak YouTube; Fox 4 News; City of Red Oak records;
Fate, TX — Monday night’s Fate City Council meeting delivered another dose of controversy and intrigue. Residents who came expecting routine municipal business instead witnessed discussions involving a recall election, disputed recordings, ethics complaints, charter interpretations, and an ongoing struggle over the future direction of city government.
Among the most controversial topics was that of a proclamation declaring June as, “Nuclear Family Month”.
Many people showed up to express their displeasure with the Mayor’s Proclamation. Among the dissenters was former Councilman Mark Harper. Harper tried to express that the proclamation would be a First Amendment violation. In the days leading up to the meeting, Harper and his wife, Sonya, used social media to rally opposition to the proclamation.
Several advocates for the LGBTQIA+ community came out in protest. They believe that the proclamation was exclusionary to same-sex couples with children. But praising one model is not the same thing as declaring other models illegitimate, inferior under the law, or unworthy of respect.
Just as a city may issue a proclamation recognizing military families, such does not exclude civilian families. A city may celebrate small local businesses, but it doesn’t mean they are attacking large corporations. Governments frequently highlight specific groups, traditions, or institutions because they believe those groups have made valuable contributions. Recognition is not necessarily exclusion. This applies to same-sex couples.
Supporters of the proclamation reject claims that the Proclamation violated the First Amendment.
First, government officials are not required to be secular. The Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized that religious references are deeply embedded in American public life. Every City Council meeting opens with a prayer; virtually all of them from a Judeo-Christian perspective. Proclamations recognizing Christmas, Thanksgiving, National Days of Prayer, and similar observances have existed throughout American history. Our national motto is “In God We Trust.“
Second, a proclamation is not a law. The Fate proclamation does not compel anyone to believe anything, attend church, adopt a particular family structure, marry, have children, or embrace Christianity. It creates no penalties, no regulations, and no government program. It is merely a symbolic expression of values. The Supreme Court has consistently distinguished between government coercion and government expression.
Third, elected officials have First Amendment rights too. Mayor Andrew Greenberg and the City Council are allowed to express viewpoints. Governments issue proclamations all the time recognizing Pride Month, Black History Month, Women’s History Month, Veterans Day, and countless other causes and constituencies. The fact that some residents in the LGBTQIA+ community disagree with the message does not make it unconstitutional. The First Amendment protects speech people dislike just as much as speech people support.
In fact, in this same meeting, Mayor Andrew Greenberg presented a proclamation to declare June 2nd, 2026, as Codi Chinn Day. This follows Chinn’s removal from office through the recall process earlier this year. Some residents have criticized Chinn’s social media activity, referring to her social media style as, “toxic”, while others have defended her conduct. Many residents question whether a recalled councilperson deserves an appreciation award at all.
Mayor Greenberg acknowledged that initially, he let his own personal anger and frustration get the better of him as he first decided that Chinn would not get a proclamation. He acknowledged that he made that decision as “Andrew”, not as, “Mayor”. After he settled on allowing the proclamation to go forth, he had missed the deadline for the previous meeting, thus causing a delay that some in the community interpreted as a slight. After reflection, he wanted to make it right.
Thus, a proclamation is not a law. It is a symbolic expression of opinion that residents are free to agree or disagree with.
Another significant action before the council was the consideration of an ordinance ordering a special election to determine whether Councilwoman Martha Huffman should be removed from office through the recall process. Huffman elected not to have a hearing over the matter, and thus her recall is the first to be considered. The motion passed, and her recall will be on the November general election ballot.
Mayor Andrew Greenberg presented information and research concerning charter provisions governing council vacancies, an issue that has arisen following the recall of former Councilwoman Codi Chinn. The presentation included discussion of Charter Review Commission deliberations, prior council actions, public records, meeting minutes, and constitutional considerations regarding the city’s vacancy procedures.
According to Greenberg’s presentation, several past appointments, including that of former Councilman Scott Kelley, may not have complied with the charter’s vacancy provisions.
Going forward, as the council follows the written & approved language of the charter, appointments will be made for only the 6-month period between November and May elections.
The council voted that an appointment will be made for Place 1, which will last until November, when an election will be held to finish out the unexpired term to May 2027 … which will then culminate in the regularly scheduled election for that seat.
Transparency was another major theme of the evening.
After Mayor and Council reports, the Council adjourned once again into executive session to discuss with attorney, matters of ethics complaints filed by Former Councilman Mark Harper against Mayor Greenberg, Ethics complaints against Mark Harper, and Codi Chinn by Darcy Gildon. This executive session ended just before midnight.
Upon return, Councilman Allan Robbins moved to find that Greenberg had violated ethics and asked that the council proceed with sanctions against the mayor. The motion was 2nd by Councilwoman Ashley Gains. The mayor expressed that there was no credible evidence that was sufficiently explained. The motion failed on a 4-2 vote, ending the matter without sanctions against the mayor. The complaint is now closed.
Initial screening of ethics complaint against Codi Chinn by Darcy Gildon. The Council found that investigation of the complaint is sufficient and that an investigative report will be submitted to the Council at the July meeting.
Initial screening of ethics complaint against Mark Harper by Darcy Gildon. The Council voted to dismiss the complaint after determining that the evidence presented was insufficient to warrant further action. Motion submitted by Robbins and 2nd by Rains. Only Mark Hatley voted against the motion. The matter is now closed.
The meeting concluded Tuesday morning, just after midnight.
Featured
Top 10 Reasons Why Conservatives are SHOCKED to See Dustin Burrows Campaigning for Katrina Pierson
OPINION
Rockwall, TX – For years, Katrina Pierson carefully cultivated an image as a fiery grassroots conservative willing to battle the Republican establishment. From cable news appearances to campaign stages, Pierson positioned herself as a voice for the forgotten conservative voter — the kind of activist who would stand shoulder-to-shoulder with ordinary Texans against the Austin political machine. That is precisely why many grassroots conservatives are now stunned to see her openly embracing one of the most controversial establishment figures in the Texas House: Speaker Dustin Burrows.
Burrows has become a lightning rod inside Republican politics, criticized by conservatives for his role in the Dennis Bonnen scandal, his alliance with the House establishment wing, his reliance on Democrat support in the Speaker’s race, and his ongoing battles with the grassroots movement. To many activists, Burrows represents the very culture of insider deal-making and power preservation that the MAGA movement was built to oppose. Yet despite that record, Pierson has welcomed his support and appears increasingly comfortable standing alongside the Austin insider crowd many conservatives believed she once opposed.
Politics often changes people. Some enter public life promising reform, only to discover that proximity to power can be intoxicating. Critics now argue that Pierson’s alliance with Burrows signals more than simple political strategy — they see it as a symbol of a broader surrender by figures who once claimed to fight for the grassroots. Whether voters view her partnership with Burrows as pragmatic coalition-building or outright political betrayal may ultimately define how conservatives remember Katrina Pierson’s next chapter.
1. The Dennis Bonnen “Target List” Scandal (2019)
This remains the defining controversy of Burrows’ career.
Burrows attended a secretly recorded meeting with then-House Speaker Dennis Bonnen and conservative activist Michael Quinn Sullivan of Empower Texans. According to the recording, Bonnen and Burrows discussed providing House media credentials and identifying Republican lawmakers for possible primary challenges.
The fallout was explosive:
- Bonnen eventually announced he would not seek another term as speaker.
- Burrows resigned as chairman of the House Republican Caucus.
- Conservatives accused Burrows of participating in an insider political purge operation.
Although investigators later concluded no criminal laws were broken, the episode permanently damaged Burrows’ reputation among many grassroots conservatives.
2. Allegations of Targeting Conservative Republicans
The same 2019 recording fueled accusations that Burrows helped create a “hit list” of Republicans deemed insufficiently loyal to House leadership.
Critics argued the effort was designed to protect establishment Republicans and punish insurgent conservatives aligned with groups like Empower Texans and the Texas Freedom Caucus.
For many on the right, this controversy established Burrows as part of the House power structure that routinely fought conservative activists.
3. Winning the Speakership With Democratic Support
Burrows’ election as Speaker in January 2025 became another major flashpoint.
He defeated Republican caucus-backed candidate David Cook largely because 49 Democrats joined 36 Republicans to elect him speaker.
Conservative Republicans and activists accused Burrows of:
- Violating the spirit of Republican caucus unity,
- Empowering Democrats,
- Continuing the “coalition House” model long criticized by the grassroots.
Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick publicly blasted the effort, calling it effectively a “coup d’état” against the GOP caucus process.
4. Association With the “Establishment Wing” of the GOP
Burrows became closely associated with former Speaker Dade Phelan and the institutional leadership faction of the House.
After the impeachment of Attorney General Ken Paxton, tensions inside the Republican Party intensified dramatically. Burrows was viewed by many conservatives as aligned with the anti-Paxton House leadership faction.
Though Burrows was not the central architect of the impeachment proceedings, his close alliance with Phelan politically tied him to that conflict.
5. The “Death Star Bill” (HB 2127)
Burrows authored House Bill 2127, nicknamed by critics the “Death Star Bill.”
The legislation sharply restricted the ability of Texas cities and counties to create local regulations exceeding state law in areas such as:
- labor rules,
- environmental regulations,
- agriculture,
- business operations.
Supporters called it necessary to stop a patchwork of local regulations harming businesses.
Opponents argued:
- it stripped local control,
- undermined home-rule cities,
- centralized power in Austin.
The bill triggered multiple lawsuits and became one of the most litigated Texas laws in recent years.
6. Accusations of Working Too Closely With Democrats
Even after becoming speaker, Burrows faced persistent criticism from the Republican right for preserving Democratic influence in the House.
Although committee chairmanships eventually remained Republican-only, Democrats retained vice-chair roles and influence in committee operations.
Conservative critics argued:
- Republicans should fully control the chamber,
- Democrats should not hold institutional leverage,
- Burrows was perpetuating bipartisan governance models that diluted conservative priorities.
This issue became central to Republican grassroots anger against House leadership generally.
7. Republican Censure Threats
Following the speaker race, some Republicans pushed to censure Burrows and allied lawmakers under Texas GOP Rule 44.
The rule theoretically allows censured Republicans to be denied ballot access in GOP primaries.
Burrows and his allies argued the rule violated free association rights and punished lawmakers for independent votes.
The controversy exposed a widening civil war within the Texas Republican Party between:
- institutional conservatives,
- populist conservatives,
- activist grassroots factions.
8. Allegations of Political Surveillance During Speaker Race
During the heated 2024 speaker contest, reports surfaced alleging allies connected to Burrows engaged in monitoring Democratic caucus activity.
Texas Scorecard published allegations involving political intelligence gathering tied to former Speaker Bonnen on Burrows’ behalf. The accusations intensified distrust during the already bitter speaker fight.
No criminal findings emerged publicly from those allegations, but they further fueled perceptions of insider political maneuvering around Burrows.
9. Handling of Attempts to Remove Him as Speaker
In 2025, Rep. Brian Harrison attempted to initiate proceedings to remove Burrows as speaker.
Harrison accused Burrows of:
- empowering Democrats,
- blocking conservative priorities,
- manipulating House procedures.
Burrows refused to recognize the initial motion on procedural grounds, which critics described as protecting leadership through parliamentary control.
The House later overwhelmingly shut down the removal effort.
10. Enforcement Actions During Democrat Quorum Break
During the 2025 special session over congressional redistricting, House Democrats fled Texas to deny quorum. Burrows authorized “call of the House” enforcement measures and arrest warrants compelling absent lawmakers to return.
Supporters argued:
- he was enforcing constitutional legislative duties,
- Democrats were obstructing lawful governance.
Critics said:
- the enforcement measures were excessive,
- legislators were effectively treated like fugitives,
- the House atmosphere became increasingly authoritarian.
The incident drew national attention and deepened partisan tensions.
Broader Political Significance
Burrows’ controversies are not merely personal scandals; they reflect the larger ideological war inside Texas Republican politics.
He sits at the intersection of:
- establishment conservatism,
- business-oriented Republican governance,
- institutional House traditions,
- and insurgent populist conservatism aligned with grassroots activists and figures like Paxton.
To supporters, Burrows is an effective operator who can actually pass legislation.
To critics, he symbolizes the Austin political machine conservatives have spent years trying to dismantle.
True MAGA representatives should run far away from establishment RINOs like Dustin Burrows. Katrina Pierson should know better … unless, she is not the person we thought she was.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login