Dallas, TX – In a heated and divisive political climate, Rep. Jasmine Crockett [D-TX-30] has reignited controversy with a fiery post on X.com, doubling down on her stance regarding H.R.8081, the “Denying Infinite Security and Government Resources Allocated toward Convicted and Extremely Dishonorable Former Protectees Act.” This bill, co-sponsored by Crockett, aims to strip former President Donald Trump of his Secret Service protection, following his conviction on felony charges.
Crockett’s Explosive Response
Following an assassination attempt on Trump during a rally in Pennsylvania, Crockett took to X.com to defend her position and challenge her critics. Her post, marked by overt racism and sexism, has drawn sharp rebuke from across the political spectrum. Crockett’s inflammatory remarks included accusations of “white privilege” and a stark dismissal of her opponents as “losers” and “illogical.”
“Oh the evil & illogical who don’t even serve on my level believe they have sway or authority over me (insert white privilege),” Crockett wrote. She continued, “While I’ve been out of the country on official business, these losers have been looking for Twitter clout.”
Crockett’s post not only defended her stance on the bill but also questioned why taxpayers should foot the bill for Secret Service protection for a convicted felon. “As a sitting member of congress we don’t even get secret service protection so why should taxpayers foot the bill for someone who a jury of his/her peers has deemed guilty of a felony or in this case 34 of ‘em, if they are sentenced to time.”
Oh the evil & illogical who don’t even serve on my level believe they have sway or authority over me (insert white privilege).
— Jasmine Crockett (@JasmineForUS) July 17, 2024
While I’ve been out of the country on official business, these losers have been looking for Twitter clout.
But I’ll be gracious because I’m sure half… https://t.co/cDtEQ5hzte
A Brazen Attack on Trump and Republicans
Crockett’s comments went further, questioning the masculinity of Trump and his supporters. She compared Trump’s situation to that of Martha Stewart, suggesting that Trump’s supporters were implying he was weaker than Stewart. “If Martha Stewart could survive, I’m not sure why y’all are so scared that your Orange Savior couldn’t or is it that you want to admit that women are stronger than many of you, including him?” she quipped.
Her rhetoric didn’t stop there. Crockett boldly challenged her critics to try to unseat her, confident that her constituents would stand by her. “The next time you think it’s a great idea to talk to me; don’t. And… If y’all think your ideas or opinions matter to my district, go work against me to get me kicked out of office… I dare you to go knock doors in my district and cry a river to my constituents and see how it works out for you 😘.”
A Divisive Figure
Crockett’s post has been widely condemned as not only defensive but deeply divisive. Critics accuse her of using overtly racist and sexist language to attack her opponents, while also displaying a palpable hatred for Donald Trump.
Townhall.com highlighted Crockett’s remarks, pointing out the inflammatory nature of her statements. “Crockett also found a way to make yet another issue about ‘white privilege’ and her own importance,” noted the publication. This rhetoric, coupled with her dismissal of her critics, suggests that Crockett may be attempting to position herself as a victim in this scenario.
Political Fallout
The political fallout from Crockett’s comments has been swift. Texas Republicans, already calling for her resignation over the bill, have intensified their demands. The assassination attempt on Trump has only heightened the urgency and emotion surrounding this issue.
Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MS), who introduced the bill, also faced backlash for his stance. While Thompson responded more diplomatically, Crockett’s aggressive post has drawn significantly more attention and criticism.
Trump’s Legal Battles
The bill in question, introduced on April 19, came just before Trump’s conviction on 34 felony counts in New York. The legal battles surrounding Trump have been a focal point of national attention, and the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity in the Trump v. United States case has further complicated the situation. Trump’s sentencing, initially scheduled for July 11, has been delayed to September 18, with many believing his conviction will be overturned on appeal.
Independent Candidate Ken Ashby
In the midst of this controversy, Independent candidate Ken Ashby is gaining traction as he challenges Crockett in the upcoming election. With no Republican candidate in District 30, Ashby has positioned himself as the primary conservative alternative. He has capitalized on the controversy surrounding Crockett, criticizing her judgment and her divisive rhetoric.
Ashby released a statement condemning Crockett’s remarks, emphasizing the need for unity and respect in political discourse. “This bill is a dangerous precedent. We must protect all our Presidents, past and present, to uphold the dignity of the office and ensure national security,” Ashby stated.
A Community Divided
Crockett’s district, encompassing parts of Dallas and surrounding areas, remains divided. While some constituents support her strong stance and outspoken nature, others are dismayed by her comments and the potential implications of the DISGRACED Former Protectees Act.
As the political drama unfolds, Rep. Jasmine Crockett remains defiant in the face of mounting criticism. Her recent post on X.com has only deepened the controversy surrounding her co-sponsorship of H.R.8081 and her stance on Trump’s Secret Service protection. With the upcoming election and a formidable opponent in Ken Ashby, Crockett’s political future hangs in the balance. The voters of Texas’ 30th District will ultimately decide whether they stand by Crockett’s divisive rhetoric or seek a new direction in their representation.
The outcome of this race will not only impact North Texas but also reflect the broader national divisions and the challenges facing American politics today.