In the annals of history, certain figures stand out as beacons of hope, individuals who, in times of uncertainty, take bold actions that rally the spirits of the people. Such an analogy is not just reserved for the past, as today’s political landscape sees the emergence of a new kind of leader, Representative Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.), whose actions have evoked comparisons to Lieutenant Colonel James Doolittle. This comparison, though seemingly unconventional, holds a kernel of truth that deserves examination.
Doolittle’s bombing raid on Japan during World War II is often regarded as a daring but inconsequential act in terms of strategic impact. The damage inflicted was minor, but the raid achieved something far more profound. It symbolized the vulnerability of the Japanese mainland and served as a morale booster for Americans still reeling from the devastating attack on Pearl Harbor. Doolittle’s mission sowed doubt in the minds of the Japanese people about their leadership, reinforcing the resolve of the American populace.
Fast forward to today, and we find Representative Matt Gaetz in a similar role within the Republican Party. Gaetz has made waves by calling for the removal of Speaker Kevin McCarthy, a move criticized by both conservative and establishment Republicans. Much like Doolittle’s raid, Gaetz’s actions may not have delivered immediate, tangible results, but they have had a profound impact on the political landscape.
In Gaetz’s case, the removal of Speaker McCarthy was a response to the disappointment many felt in the lack of progress on the promises made when McCarthy assumed the role. The establishment and establishment Republicans criticized Gaetz’s move, but as the saying goes, “The harshest criticisms come from those who stand in the way.”
The favorite to replace McCarthy was Jim Jordan, a choice that resonated with the people but made establishment RINOs uncomfortable. The establishment’s resistance to Jordan revealed their alignment with interests that do not necessarily serve the American people. The ousting of McCarthy did result in a 22-day period without a Speaker, which some labeled as a disaster. However, it raises an important question: what had the House accomplished in the previous months under McCarthy’s leadership? The answer, unfortunately, was not much of substance.
Critics of Gaetz have focused on the chaos and division within the Republican Party, but a closer look reveals that his actions have exposed the RINOs within the party. These so-called Republicans in name only have been revealed as the obstacles to meaningful change. They have been quick to oppose the People’s choice, even if it means going against the very constituents they are supposed to represent.
In the end, 25 Republicans voted against Jim Jordan, the candidate favored by the people, with three of them hailing from Texas. This list of “nay” votes tells a story of its own, as it represents those who prioritize their own interests over the will of the American people. Here are the 25 Republicans who voted against Jim Jordan, a list that may very well face primary opposition from their own constituents:
- Rep. Don Bacon of Nebraska
- Rep. Vern Buchanan of Florida
- Rep. Ken Buck of Colorado
- Rep. Lori Chavez-DeRemer of Oregon
- Rep. Anthony D’Eposito of New York
- Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart of Florida
- Rep. Jake Ellzey of Texas
- Rep. Drew Ferguson of Georgia
- Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania
- Rep. Andrew Garbarino of New York
- Rep. Carlos Gimenez of Florida
- Rep. Tony Gonzales of Texas
- Rep. Kay Granger of Texas
- Rep. John James of Michigan
- Rep. Tom Kean of New Jersey
- Rep. Mike Kelly of Pennsylvania
- Rep. Jen Kiggans of Virginia
- Rep. Nick LaLota of New York
- Rep. Mike Lawler of New York
- Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks of Iowa
- Rep. Marc Molinaro of New York
- Rep. John Rutherford of Florida
- Rep. Mike Simpson of Idaho
- Rep. Pete Stauber of Minnesota
- Rep. Steve Womack of Arkansas
However, what sets Gaetz apart is his ability to mobilize the American populace. People across the nation, inspired by Gaetz’s stance, flooded their representatives with calls, expressing their displeasure with the RINOs who voted against Jordan. Social media figures, such as “Catturd,” offered their platforms to candidates challenging these Republican turncoats. The conservative movement is gaining momentum, driven by this drama within the Republican Party.
What some see as disarray, others perceive as a strengthening of the American people’s resolve in their battle against the establishment. In many ways, Matt Gaetz has become the James Doolittle of the Republican Party, a symbol of hope and a force that exposes the vulnerabilities of the entrenched establishment. Just as Doolittle’s raid uplifted the spirits of Americans during World War II, Gaetz’s actions are giving hope to the people and instilling fear in the establishment RINOs. It’s a testament to the power of bold action and the potential for change when the people unite behind a common cause.